Cargando…

Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of graft rejection, one of the most serious concerns with this procedure, and to evaluate the recovery of visual function in those patients for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza, Sorkhabi, Rana, Shenasi, Abdollah, Dehghan, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S22959
_version_ 1782212649655730176
author Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza
Sorkhabi, Rana
Shenasi, Abdollah
Dehghan, Hassan
author_facet Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza
Sorkhabi, Rana
Shenasi, Abdollah
Dehghan, Hassan
author_sort Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of graft rejection, one of the most serious concerns with this procedure, and to evaluate the recovery of visual function in those patients for whom the operation was successful. METHODS: We describe a retrospective study of 33 corneal ulcer patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) at the Tabriz Nikookari Eye Hospital. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 44 ± 14 years. Most common risk factors for active keratitis were trauma, dry eye, and malnutrition. Culture-positive results included bacterial keratitis (n = 15) and fungal keratitis (n = 5). Perforation was a significant risk factor for therapeutic failure (P < 0.05). Age or gender had no statistically significant effects on the PK outcome (P > 0.05). Postoperative visual acuity had a significant association with preoperative visual acuity (P < 0.01). Graft rejection rate (27.2%) was similar to that reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Although lamellar keratoplasty has recently been established, there are practical reasons for continuing the use of PK in centers such as ours, with due attention to the requirement for topical immunosuppression to diminish the rate of graft rejection and antimicrobial treatment to prevent postoperative infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31804952011-09-30 Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza Sorkhabi, Rana Shenasi, Abdollah Dehghan, Hassan Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of graft rejection, one of the most serious concerns with this procedure, and to evaluate the recovery of visual function in those patients for whom the operation was successful. METHODS: We describe a retrospective study of 33 corneal ulcer patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) at the Tabriz Nikookari Eye Hospital. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 44 ± 14 years. Most common risk factors for active keratitis were trauma, dry eye, and malnutrition. Culture-positive results included bacterial keratitis (n = 15) and fungal keratitis (n = 5). Perforation was a significant risk factor for therapeutic failure (P < 0.05). Age or gender had no statistically significant effects on the PK outcome (P > 0.05). Postoperative visual acuity had a significant association with preoperative visual acuity (P < 0.01). Graft rejection rate (27.2%) was similar to that reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Although lamellar keratoplasty has recently been established, there are practical reasons for continuing the use of PK in centers such as ours, with due attention to the requirement for topical immunosuppression to diminish the rate of graft rejection and antimicrobial treatment to prevent postoperative infection. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3180495/ /pubmed/21966198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S22959 Text en © 2011 Sedghipour et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sedghipour, Mohammad Reza
Sorkhabi, Rana
Shenasi, Abdollah
Dehghan, Hassan
Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_full Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_fullStr Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_short Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_sort outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S22959
work_keys_str_mv AT sedghipourmohammadreza outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT sorkhabirana outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT shenasiabdollah outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT dehghanhassan outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience