Cargando…
Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer
PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confir...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966217 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23656 |
_version_ | 1782212655107276800 |
---|---|
author | Shabat, Shay Miller, Larry E Block, Jon E Gepstein, Reuven |
author_facet | Shabat, Shay Miller, Larry E Block, Jon E Gepstein, Reuven |
author_sort | Shabat, Shay |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. RESULTS: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%–89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. CONCLUSION: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3180519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31805192011-09-30 Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer Shabat, Shay Miller, Larry E Block, Jon E Gepstein, Reuven Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. RESULTS: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%–89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. CONCLUSION: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3180519/ /pubmed/21966217 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23656 Text en © 2011 Shabat et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shabat, Shay Miller, Larry E Block, Jon E Gepstein, Reuven Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title | Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title_full | Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title_short | Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
title_sort | minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966217 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shabatshay minimallyinvasivetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosiswithanovelinterspinousspacer AT millerlarrye minimallyinvasivetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosiswithanovelinterspinousspacer AT blockjone minimallyinvasivetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosiswithanovelinterspinousspacer AT gepsteinreuven minimallyinvasivetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosiswithanovelinterspinousspacer |