Cargando…

Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the clinicopathologic findings of an endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps with subsequent surgery and to evaluate the appropriateness of the pathologic finding criterion of the resection margin as an indicator for surgery in cases of malignant color...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Eun Jung, Kim, Dae Dong, Cho, Chang Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21980590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.194
_version_ 1782212661184823296
author Jang, Eun Jung
Kim, Dae Dong
Cho, Chang Ho
author_facet Jang, Eun Jung
Kim, Dae Dong
Cho, Chang Ho
author_sort Jang, Eun Jung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the clinicopathologic findings of an endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps with subsequent surgery and to evaluate the appropriateness of the pathologic finding criterion of the resection margin as an indicator for surgery in cases of malignant colorectal polyps. METHODS: We examined the clinicopathologic characteristics, complications and prognoses among the patients who underwent a colonoscopic polypectomy in both our hospitals and at other hospitals from April 2003 and April 2010. These patients were divided into two groups, the group (non-operation group) that only underwent a polypectomy (n = 37) and the group (operation group) that underwent a polypectomy with subsequent surgery (n = 33). RESULTS: There were no differences between two groups in the ratios of the number of men to the number of women, the ages or the comorbidities. In terms of endoscopic findings, we found no differences between the two groups in the locations of the polyps, the sizes of the polyps, or the presence of stalks. However, ulceration of polyps was higher in the non-operation group (51.5% vs. 21.6%; P = 0.009), as was the case with submucosal invasion (75.8% vs. 16.2%; P < 0.005). When an endoscopic polypectomy was performed, incomplete resection margins and specimens with margins involved occurred more frequently in the operation group (93.9% vs. 51.4%; P < 0.005), but no residual tumor was detected in 31 of 33 (93.9%) patients in that group. One pathologist reviewed the specimens of 54 patients (operation group, 19; non-operation group, 36). Six of the 19 polyps (31.6%) in the operation group and fifteen of the 36 polyps (41.7%) in the non-operation group had a margin without cancer cells. CONCLUSION: We may accept the criterion of a safe margin, including a coagulation zone. A multidisciplinary approach has to be developed by surgeons, endoscopists and pathologists based on a discussion of the risk factors for the patient before making a decision on the treatment treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31806002011-10-06 Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps Jang, Eun Jung Kim, Dae Dong Cho, Chang Ho J Korean Soc Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the clinicopathologic findings of an endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps with subsequent surgery and to evaluate the appropriateness of the pathologic finding criterion of the resection margin as an indicator for surgery in cases of malignant colorectal polyps. METHODS: We examined the clinicopathologic characteristics, complications and prognoses among the patients who underwent a colonoscopic polypectomy in both our hospitals and at other hospitals from April 2003 and April 2010. These patients were divided into two groups, the group (non-operation group) that only underwent a polypectomy (n = 37) and the group (operation group) that underwent a polypectomy with subsequent surgery (n = 33). RESULTS: There were no differences between two groups in the ratios of the number of men to the number of women, the ages or the comorbidities. In terms of endoscopic findings, we found no differences between the two groups in the locations of the polyps, the sizes of the polyps, or the presence of stalks. However, ulceration of polyps was higher in the non-operation group (51.5% vs. 21.6%; P = 0.009), as was the case with submucosal invasion (75.8% vs. 16.2%; P < 0.005). When an endoscopic polypectomy was performed, incomplete resection margins and specimens with margins involved occurred more frequently in the operation group (93.9% vs. 51.4%; P < 0.005), but no residual tumor was detected in 31 of 33 (93.9%) patients in that group. One pathologist reviewed the specimens of 54 patients (operation group, 19; non-operation group, 36). Six of the 19 polyps (31.6%) in the operation group and fifteen of the 36 polyps (41.7%) in the non-operation group had a margin without cancer cells. CONCLUSION: We may accept the criterion of a safe margin, including a coagulation zone. A multidisciplinary approach has to be developed by surgeons, endoscopists and pathologists based on a discussion of the risk factors for the patient before making a decision on the treatment treatment. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011-08 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3180600/ /pubmed/21980590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.194 Text en © 2011 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jang, Eun Jung
Kim, Dae Dong
Cho, Chang Ho
Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title_full Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title_fullStr Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title_full_unstemmed Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title_short Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps
title_sort value and interpretation of resection margin after a colonoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21980590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.194
work_keys_str_mv AT jangeunjung valueandinterpretationofresectionmarginafteracolonoscopicpolypectomyformalignantpolyps
AT kimdaedong valueandinterpretationofresectionmarginafteracolonoscopicpolypectomyformalignantpolyps
AT chochangho valueandinterpretationofresectionmarginafteracolonoscopicpolypectomyformalignantpolyps