Cargando…

Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma

PURPOSE: Metastatic melanoma patients have a poor prognosis. No chemotherapy regimen has improved overall survival. More effective treatments are needed. Docetaxel has clinical activity in melanoma and may be more active when combined with vinorelbine. Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eroglu, Zeynep, Kong, Kevin M., Jakowatz, James G., Samlowski, Wolfram, Fruehauf, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1703-z
_version_ 1782212666300825600
author Eroglu, Zeynep
Kong, Kevin M.
Jakowatz, James G.
Samlowski, Wolfram
Fruehauf, John P.
author_facet Eroglu, Zeynep
Kong, Kevin M.
Jakowatz, James G.
Samlowski, Wolfram
Fruehauf, John P.
author_sort Eroglu, Zeynep
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Metastatic melanoma patients have a poor prognosis. No chemotherapy regimen has improved overall survival. More effective treatments are needed. Docetaxel has clinical activity in melanoma and may be more active when combined with vinorelbine. Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has shown activity as an adjuvant melanoma therapy. We carried out a phase II study of these agents in patients with stage IV melanoma. METHODS: Patients had documented stage IV melanoma and may have had prior immuno or chemotherapy. Previously treated brain metastases were allowed. Docetaxel (40 mg/m(2) IV) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) IV) were administered every 14 days, followed by GM-CSF (250 mg/m2 SC on days 2 to 12). The primary endpoint of the study was 1-year overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were median overall survival, response rate (per RECIST criteria), and the toxicity profiles. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled; 80% had stage M1c disease. Brain metastases were present in 21%. Fifty-two percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy, including 35% who received prior biochemotherapy. Toxicity was manageable. Grade III/IV toxicities included neutropenia (31%), anemia (14%), febrile neutropenia (11.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). DVS chemotherapy demonstrated clinical activity, with a partial response in 15%, and disease stabilization in 37%. Six-month PFS was 37%. Median OS was 11.4 months and 1-year OS rate was 48.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The DVS regimen was active in patients with advanced, previously treated melanoma, with manageable toxicity. The favorable 1-year overall survival and median survival rates suggest that further evaluation of the DVS regimen is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31806312011-10-04 Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma Eroglu, Zeynep Kong, Kevin M. Jakowatz, James G. Samlowski, Wolfram Fruehauf, John P. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: Metastatic melanoma patients have a poor prognosis. No chemotherapy regimen has improved overall survival. More effective treatments are needed. Docetaxel has clinical activity in melanoma and may be more active when combined with vinorelbine. Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has shown activity as an adjuvant melanoma therapy. We carried out a phase II study of these agents in patients with stage IV melanoma. METHODS: Patients had documented stage IV melanoma and may have had prior immuno or chemotherapy. Previously treated brain metastases were allowed. Docetaxel (40 mg/m(2) IV) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) IV) were administered every 14 days, followed by GM-CSF (250 mg/m2 SC on days 2 to 12). The primary endpoint of the study was 1-year overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were median overall survival, response rate (per RECIST criteria), and the toxicity profiles. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled; 80% had stage M1c disease. Brain metastases were present in 21%. Fifty-two percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy, including 35% who received prior biochemotherapy. Toxicity was manageable. Grade III/IV toxicities included neutropenia (31%), anemia (14%), febrile neutropenia (11.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). DVS chemotherapy demonstrated clinical activity, with a partial response in 15%, and disease stabilization in 37%. Six-month PFS was 37%. Median OS was 11.4 months and 1-year OS rate was 48.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The DVS regimen was active in patients with advanced, previously treated melanoma, with manageable toxicity. The favorable 1-year overall survival and median survival rates suggest that further evaluation of the DVS regimen is warranted. Springer-Verlag 2011-07-19 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3180631/ /pubmed/21769667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1703-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Eroglu, Zeynep
Kong, Kevin M.
Jakowatz, James G.
Samlowski, Wolfram
Fruehauf, John P.
Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title_full Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title_fullStr Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title_short Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma
title_sort phase ii clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and gm-csf in stage iv melanoma
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1703-z
work_keys_str_mv AT erogluzeynep phaseiiclinicaltrialevaluatingdocetaxelvinorelbineandgmcsfinstageivmelanoma
AT kongkevinm phaseiiclinicaltrialevaluatingdocetaxelvinorelbineandgmcsfinstageivmelanoma
AT jakowatzjamesg phaseiiclinicaltrialevaluatingdocetaxelvinorelbineandgmcsfinstageivmelanoma
AT samlowskiwolfram phaseiiclinicaltrialevaluatingdocetaxelvinorelbineandgmcsfinstageivmelanoma
AT fruehaufjohnp phaseiiclinicaltrialevaluatingdocetaxelvinorelbineandgmcsfinstageivmelanoma