Cargando…

Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds

BACKGROUND: The transcriptional regulators DntR, NagR and NtdR have a high sequence identity and belong to the large family of LysR type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs). These three regulators are all involved in regulation of genes identified in pathways for degradation of aromatic compounds. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lönneborg, Rosa, Brzezinski, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-12-49
_version_ 1782212670312677376
author Lönneborg, Rosa
Brzezinski, Peter
author_facet Lönneborg, Rosa
Brzezinski, Peter
author_sort Lönneborg, Rosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transcriptional regulators DntR, NagR and NtdR have a high sequence identity and belong to the large family of LysR type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs). These three regulators are all involved in regulation of genes identified in pathways for degradation of aromatic compounds. They activate the transcription of these genes in the presence of an inducer, but the inducer specificity profiles are different. RESULTS: The results from this study show that NtdR has the broadest inducer specificity, responding to several nitro-aromatic compounds. Mutational studies of residues that differ between DntR, NagR and NtdR suggest that a number of specific residues are involved in the broader inducer specificity of NtdR when compared to DntR and NagR. The inducer response was also investigated as a function of the experimental conditions and a number of parameters such as the growth media, plasmid arrangement of the LTTR-encoding genes, promoter and gfp reporter gene, and the presence of a His(6)-tag were shown to affect the inducer response in E.coli DH5α. Furthermore, the response upon addition of both salicylate and 4-nitrobenzoate to the growth media was larger than the sum of responses upon addition of each of the compounds, which suggests the presence of a secondary binding site, as previously reported for other LTTRs. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of the growth conditions and gene arrangement resulted in improved responses to nitro-aromatic inducers. The data also suggests the presence of a previously unknown secondary binding site in DntR, analogous to that of BenM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31806482011-09-27 Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds Lönneborg, Rosa Brzezinski, Peter BMC Biochem Research Article BACKGROUND: The transcriptional regulators DntR, NagR and NtdR have a high sequence identity and belong to the large family of LysR type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs). These three regulators are all involved in regulation of genes identified in pathways for degradation of aromatic compounds. They activate the transcription of these genes in the presence of an inducer, but the inducer specificity profiles are different. RESULTS: The results from this study show that NtdR has the broadest inducer specificity, responding to several nitro-aromatic compounds. Mutational studies of residues that differ between DntR, NagR and NtdR suggest that a number of specific residues are involved in the broader inducer specificity of NtdR when compared to DntR and NagR. The inducer response was also investigated as a function of the experimental conditions and a number of parameters such as the growth media, plasmid arrangement of the LTTR-encoding genes, promoter and gfp reporter gene, and the presence of a His(6)-tag were shown to affect the inducer response in E.coli DH5α. Furthermore, the response upon addition of both salicylate and 4-nitrobenzoate to the growth media was larger than the sum of responses upon addition of each of the compounds, which suggests the presence of a secondary binding site, as previously reported for other LTTRs. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of the growth conditions and gene arrangement resulted in improved responses to nitro-aromatic inducers. The data also suggests the presence of a previously unknown secondary binding site in DntR, analogous to that of BenM. BioMed Central 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3180648/ /pubmed/21884597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-12-49 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lönneborg and Brzezinski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lönneborg, Rosa
Brzezinski, Peter
Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title_full Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title_fullStr Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title_full_unstemmed Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title_short Factors that influence the response of the LysR type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
title_sort factors that influence the response of the lysr type transcriptional regulators to aromatic compounds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-12-49
work_keys_str_mv AT lonneborgrosa factorsthatinfluencetheresponseofthelysrtypetranscriptionalregulatorstoaromaticcompounds
AT brzezinskipeter factorsthatinfluencetheresponseofthelysrtypetranscriptionalregulatorstoaromaticcompounds