Cargando…

Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) emerged in the late 1960s as a possible therapeutic alternative to lesioning in patients with severe, chronic, intractable pain. DBS devices in the era were based on cardiac pacing technology but were greatly modified in implementation due to the unique needs of DBS. Cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarem-Aslani, Ali, Mullett, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00046
_version_ 1782212674799534080
author Sarem-Aslani, Ali
Mullett, Keith
author_facet Sarem-Aslani, Ali
Mullett, Keith
author_sort Sarem-Aslani, Ali
collection PubMed
description Deep brain stimulation (DBS) emerged in the late 1960s as a possible therapeutic alternative to lesioning in patients with severe, chronic, intractable pain. DBS devices in the era were based on cardiac pacing technology but were greatly modified in implementation due to the unique needs of DBS. Clinical studies in the 1970s and early 1980s have revealed a technique with modest results which did not lead to regulatory approval for the treatment of pain. In the 1980s a new application for DBS emerged in the treatment of movement disorders. Clinical trials confirmed the robustness of the therapy leading to approvals by regulatory authorities in the US and Europe for the treatment of tremor and the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Technology based on that used for earlier clinical research in pain was improved by leveraging advances in cardiac pacing technology resulting in the sophisticated and reliable systems available today. In the 1990s scientific exploration began in the treatment of psychiatric disorders which is ongoing today. Simultaneously, studies into the treatment of epilepsy were begun which resulted in regulatory approval in Europe. Suggestions have been made to expand these scientific explorations to other central nervous system dysfunctions. Opportunity remains to improve the technology including individualized and symptom specific stimulation patterns, more physician and patient friendly programming, and possibly closed-loop systems for more situation dependent and effective therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31806712011-10-11 Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments Sarem-Aslani, Ali Mullett, Keith Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience Deep brain stimulation (DBS) emerged in the late 1960s as a possible therapeutic alternative to lesioning in patients with severe, chronic, intractable pain. DBS devices in the era were based on cardiac pacing technology but were greatly modified in implementation due to the unique needs of DBS. Clinical studies in the 1970s and early 1980s have revealed a technique with modest results which did not lead to regulatory approval for the treatment of pain. In the 1980s a new application for DBS emerged in the treatment of movement disorders. Clinical trials confirmed the robustness of the therapy leading to approvals by regulatory authorities in the US and Europe for the treatment of tremor and the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Technology based on that used for earlier clinical research in pain was improved by leveraging advances in cardiac pacing technology resulting in the sophisticated and reliable systems available today. In the 1990s scientific exploration began in the treatment of psychiatric disorders which is ongoing today. Simultaneously, studies into the treatment of epilepsy were begun which resulted in regulatory approval in Europe. Suggestions have been made to expand these scientific explorations to other central nervous system dysfunctions. Opportunity remains to improve the technology including individualized and symptom specific stimulation patterns, more physician and patient friendly programming, and possibly closed-loop systems for more situation dependent and effective therapy. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3180671/ /pubmed/21991248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00046 Text en Copyright © 2011 Sarem-Aslani and Mullett. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sarem-Aslani, Ali
Mullett, Keith
Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title_full Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title_fullStr Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title_full_unstemmed Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title_short Industrial Perspective on Deep Brain Stimulation: History, Current State, and Future Developments
title_sort industrial perspective on deep brain stimulation: history, current state, and future developments
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00046
work_keys_str_mv AT saremaslaniali industrialperspectiveondeepbrainstimulationhistorycurrentstateandfuturedevelopments
AT mullettkeith industrialperspectiveondeepbrainstimulationhistorycurrentstateandfuturedevelopments