Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study

AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikhil, Vineeta, Singh, Vijay, Chaudhry, Suruchi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068
_version_ 1782212702521786368
author Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Vijay
Chaudhry, Suruchi
author_facet Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Vijay
Chaudhry, Suruchi
author_sort Nikhil, Vineeta
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained butanol as a solvent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intact mandibular molars were mounted in self-cured resin and the occlusal surfaces were ground with # 600 SiC paper. Adhesives were applied on the prepared dentinal surfaces and the resin composite was condensed in the split brass mold (5 × 3 mm) placed over the adhesive surface. The specimens were stored in normal saline and placed in incubator at 37°C. After 24 hours, the specimens were tested in tensile mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was done using One way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The mean bond strengths of Adper easy one, G-Bond, and Xeno V were 12.41 MPa, 10.09 MPa, and 8.67 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of contemporary adhesives in this ex vivo study revealed that the ethanol-based HEMA-rich self-etch adhesive is better than HEMA-free self-etch adhesive that contained acetone and butanol as the solvents, when compared in terms of bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31808452011-09-28 Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Vijay Chaudhry, Suruchi Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained butanol as a solvent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intact mandibular molars were mounted in self-cured resin and the occlusal surfaces were ground with # 600 SiC paper. Adhesives were applied on the prepared dentinal surfaces and the resin composite was condensed in the split brass mold (5 × 3 mm) placed over the adhesive surface. The specimens were stored in normal saline and placed in incubator at 37°C. After 24 hours, the specimens were tested in tensile mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was done using One way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The mean bond strengths of Adper easy one, G-Bond, and Xeno V were 12.41 MPa, 10.09 MPa, and 8.67 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of contemporary adhesives in this ex vivo study revealed that the ethanol-based HEMA-rich self-etch adhesive is better than HEMA-free self-etch adhesive that contained acetone and butanol as the solvents, when compared in terms of bond strength. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3180845/ /pubmed/21957383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068 Text en © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Vijay
Chaudhry, Suruchi
Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title_full Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title_short Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
title_sort comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: an ex vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068
work_keys_str_mv AT nikhilvineeta comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy
AT singhvijay comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy
AT chaudhrysuruchi comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy