Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study
AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (H...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068 |
_version_ | 1782212702521786368 |
---|---|
author | Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Vijay Chaudhry, Suruchi |
author_facet | Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Vijay Chaudhry, Suruchi |
author_sort | Nikhil, Vineeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained butanol as a solvent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intact mandibular molars were mounted in self-cured resin and the occlusal surfaces were ground with # 600 SiC paper. Adhesives were applied on the prepared dentinal surfaces and the resin composite was condensed in the split brass mold (5 × 3 mm) placed over the adhesive surface. The specimens were stored in normal saline and placed in incubator at 37°C. After 24 hours, the specimens were tested in tensile mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was done using One way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The mean bond strengths of Adper easy one, G-Bond, and Xeno V were 12.41 MPa, 10.09 MPa, and 8.67 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of contemporary adhesives in this ex vivo study revealed that the ethanol-based HEMA-rich self-etch adhesive is better than HEMA-free self-etch adhesive that contained acetone and butanol as the solvents, when compared in terms of bond strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3180845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31808452011-09-28 Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Vijay Chaudhry, Suruchi Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: This study evaluated the effect of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and the type of solvent on the tensile bond strength of the following three self-etch adhesives: Adper easy one (HEMA-rich adhesive) which contained ethanol, G-Bond (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained acetone, and Xeno V (HEMA-free adhesive) which contained butanol as a solvent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intact mandibular molars were mounted in self-cured resin and the occlusal surfaces were ground with # 600 SiC paper. Adhesives were applied on the prepared dentinal surfaces and the resin composite was condensed in the split brass mold (5 × 3 mm) placed over the adhesive surface. The specimens were stored in normal saline and placed in incubator at 37°C. After 24 hours, the specimens were tested in tensile mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was done using One way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The mean bond strengths of Adper easy one, G-Bond, and Xeno V were 12.41 MPa, 10.09 MPa, and 8.67 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of contemporary adhesives in this ex vivo study revealed that the ethanol-based HEMA-rich self-etch adhesive is better than HEMA-free self-etch adhesive that contained acetone and butanol as the solvents, when compared in terms of bond strength. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3180845/ /pubmed/21957383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068 Text en © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Vijay Chaudhry, Suruchi Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title | Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: An ex vivo study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: an ex vivo study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nikhilvineeta comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy AT singhvijay comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy AT chaudhrysuruchi comparativeevaluationofbondstrengthofthreecontemporaryselfetchadhesivesanexvivostudy |