Cargando…

Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum

INTRODUCTION: The ideal management strategy for patients presenting late with transposition of great arteries (TGA), intact ventricular septum (IVS), and regressed left ventricle (LV) is not clear. Primary switch, two-stage switch, and Senning operation are the options. Left ventricular retraining p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kothari, Shyam S, Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian, Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy, Gupta, Saurabh Kumar, Bisoi, Akshay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976872
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.84651
_version_ 1782212711926464512
author Kothari, Shyam S
Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian
Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy
Gupta, Saurabh Kumar
Bisoi, Akshay K
author_facet Kothari, Shyam S
Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian
Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy
Gupta, Saurabh Kumar
Bisoi, Akshay K
author_sort Kothari, Shyam S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ideal management strategy for patients presenting late with transposition of great arteries (TGA), intact ventricular septum (IVS), and regressed left ventricle (LV) is not clear. Primary switch, two-stage switch, and Senning operation are the options. Left ventricular retraining prior to arterial switch by ductal stenting may be effective, but the experience is very limited. METHODS: Five of six children aged 3–6 months with TGA-IVS and regressed LV underwent recanalization and transcatheter stenting of ductus arteriosus. The ductal stent was removed during arterial switch surgery. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 5/6 patients. All the patients had totally occluded ductus and needed recanalization with coronary total occlusion hardware. The ductus was dilated and stented with coronary stents. In all the patients, there was significant luminal narrowing despite adequate stent placement and deployment. Two patients needed reintervention for abrupt closure of the stent. Ductal stenting resulted in left ventricular preparedness within 7–14 days. One patient died of progressive sepsis after 14 days of stenting, even though the LV was prepared. Four patients underwent successful uneventful arterial switch surgery. During surgery, it was observed that the mucosal folds of duct were protruding through the struts of the stent in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ductal stenting is a good alternative strategy for left ventricular retraining in TGA with regressed LV even in patients with occluded ducts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31809702011-10-04 Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum Kothari, Shyam S Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy Gupta, Saurabh Kumar Bisoi, Akshay K Ann Pediatr Cardiol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The ideal management strategy for patients presenting late with transposition of great arteries (TGA), intact ventricular septum (IVS), and regressed left ventricle (LV) is not clear. Primary switch, two-stage switch, and Senning operation are the options. Left ventricular retraining prior to arterial switch by ductal stenting may be effective, but the experience is very limited. METHODS: Five of six children aged 3–6 months with TGA-IVS and regressed LV underwent recanalization and transcatheter stenting of ductus arteriosus. The ductal stent was removed during arterial switch surgery. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 5/6 patients. All the patients had totally occluded ductus and needed recanalization with coronary total occlusion hardware. The ductus was dilated and stented with coronary stents. In all the patients, there was significant luminal narrowing despite adequate stent placement and deployment. Two patients needed reintervention for abrupt closure of the stent. Ductal stenting resulted in left ventricular preparedness within 7–14 days. One patient died of progressive sepsis after 14 days of stenting, even though the LV was prepared. Four patients underwent successful uneventful arterial switch surgery. During surgery, it was observed that the mucosal folds of duct were protruding through the struts of the stent in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ductal stenting is a good alternative strategy for left ventricular retraining in TGA with regressed LV even in patients with occluded ducts. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3180970/ /pubmed/21976872 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.84651 Text en © Annals of Pediatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kothari, Shyam S
Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian
Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy
Gupta, Saurabh Kumar
Bisoi, Akshay K
Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title_full Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title_fullStr Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title_full_unstemmed Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title_short Ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with TGA intact ventricular septum
title_sort ductal recanalization and stenting for late presenters with tga intact ventricular septum
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976872
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.84651
work_keys_str_mv AT kotharishyams ductalrecanalizationandstentingforlatepresenterswithtgaintactventricularseptum
AT ramakrishnansivasubramanian ductalrecanalizationandstentingforlatepresenterswithtgaintactventricularseptum
AT senguttuvannagendraboopathy ductalrecanalizationandstentingforlatepresenterswithtgaintactventricularseptum
AT guptasaurabhkumar ductalrecanalizationandstentingforlatepresenterswithtgaintactventricularseptum
AT bisoiakshayk ductalrecanalizationandstentingforlatepresenterswithtgaintactventricularseptum