Cargando…

Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective

Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chaloupka, Frank J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843403
_version_ 1782212726608625664
author Chaloupka, Frank J.
author_facet Chaloupka, Frank J.
author_sort Chaloupka, Frank J.
collection PubMed
description Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribute to obesity are characterized by multiple failures that create an economic rationale for government to intervene (eg, consumers' lack of accurate information regarding obesogenic foods and beverages). If effective public policies for reducing obesity and its consequences are to be developed and implemented, individual rights and government interests must be balanced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3181174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31811742011-10-04 Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective Chaloupka, Frank J. Prev Chronic Dis Special Topic Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribute to obesity are characterized by multiple failures that create an economic rationale for government to intervene (eg, consumers' lack of accurate information regarding obesogenic foods and beverages). If effective public policies for reducing obesity and its consequences are to be developed and implemented, individual rights and government interests must be balanced. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3181174/ /pubmed/21843403 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Topic
Chaloupka, Frank J.
Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title_full Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title_fullStr Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title_short Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
title_sort public policy versus individual rights and responsibility: an economist’s perspective
topic Special Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843403
work_keys_str_mv AT chaloupkafrankj publicpolicyversusindividualrightsandresponsibilityaneconomistsperspective