Cargando…
Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribut...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843403 |
_version_ | 1782212726608625664 |
---|---|
author | Chaloupka, Frank J. |
author_facet | Chaloupka, Frank J. |
author_sort | Chaloupka, Frank J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribute to obesity are characterized by multiple failures that create an economic rationale for government to intervene (eg, consumers' lack of accurate information regarding obesogenic foods and beverages). If effective public policies for reducing obesity and its consequences are to be developed and implemented, individual rights and government interests must be balanced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3181174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31811742011-10-04 Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective Chaloupka, Frank J. Prev Chronic Dis Special Topic Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribute to obesity are characterized by multiple failures that create an economic rationale for government to intervene (eg, consumers' lack of accurate information regarding obesogenic foods and beverages). If effective public policies for reducing obesity and its consequences are to be developed and implemented, individual rights and government interests must be balanced. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3181174/ /pubmed/21843403 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Topic Chaloupka, Frank J. Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title | Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title_full | Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title_fullStr | Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title_short | Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective |
title_sort | public policy versus individual rights and responsibility: an economist’s perspective |
topic | Special Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21843403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaloupkafrankj publicpolicyversusindividualrightsandresponsibilityaneconomistsperspective |