Cargando…

Validity of nosological classification

The term “nosological classification” is often used in connection with medical classification systems, and the tendency is to equate it with “diagnosis” and “validity.” However, particularly in the case of psychiatry this is far from always being the case. From a scientific point of view, the two mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Smolik, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Les Laboratoires Servier 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22033755
_version_ 1782212764701294592
author Smolik, Petr
author_facet Smolik, Petr
author_sort Smolik, Petr
collection PubMed
description The term “nosological classification” is often used in connection with medical classification systems, and the tendency is to equate it with “diagnosis” and “validity.” However, particularly in the case of psychiatry this is far from always being the case. From a scientific point of view, the two most up-to-date classification systems in use today - the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), and the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) - may be considered as the theoretical basis of current psychiatric nosology. In this paper we show that the instrumentally generated DSM-IV or ICD-10 diagnoses of schizophrenia have relatively low validity in comparison with clinician expert diagnoses. If medical classification is to be realistic, simple to use, and reliable, nosological systems must be based not only on established facts, but also on theoretical assumptions regarding the nature of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3181576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Les Laboratoires Servier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31815762011-10-27 Validity of nosological classification Smolik, Petr Dialogues Clin Neurosci Clinical Research The term “nosological classification” is often used in connection with medical classification systems, and the tendency is to equate it with “diagnosis” and “validity.” However, particularly in the case of psychiatry this is far from always being the case. From a scientific point of view, the two most up-to-date classification systems in use today - the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), and the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) - may be considered as the theoretical basis of current psychiatric nosology. In this paper we show that the instrumentally generated DSM-IV or ICD-10 diagnoses of schizophrenia have relatively low validity in comparison with clinician expert diagnoses. If medical classification is to be realistic, simple to use, and reliable, nosological systems must be based not only on established facts, but also on theoretical assumptions regarding the nature of disease. Les Laboratoires Servier 1999-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3181576/ /pubmed/22033755 Text en Copyright: © 1999 LLS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Smolik, Petr
Validity of nosological classification
title Validity of nosological classification
title_full Validity of nosological classification
title_fullStr Validity of nosological classification
title_full_unstemmed Validity of nosological classification
title_short Validity of nosological classification
title_sort validity of nosological classification
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22033755
work_keys_str_mv AT smolikpetr validityofnosologicalclassification