Cargando…
Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence
Randomized evidence from clinical trials and naturalistic evidence collected from pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance activities both contribute to the initial and continuous assessment of the benefits and risks of a drug, ie, the balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety risks. Benefit...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Les Laboratoires Servier
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21842615 |
_version_ | 1782212856654069760 |
---|---|
author | Curtin, François Schulz, Pierre |
author_facet | Curtin, François Schulz, Pierre |
author_sort | Curtin, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | Randomized evidence from clinical trials and naturalistic evidence collected from pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance activities both contribute to the initial and continuous assessment of the benefits and risks of a drug, ie, the balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety risks. Benefit-risk assessment (BRA) mainly relies on a qualitative assessment of quantitative data. Current attempts to quantify BRA are reviewed and discussed, along with the expectations of regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. No method provides a fully satisfactory solution regarding BRA, because it is difficult to reduce its multidimensional aspect to simple metrics, in a context where other therapeutic alternatives play a role. Consistency and transparency are key in this assessment, which is performed throughout the whole drug life cycle. BRA is mainly based on randomized clinical studies during clinical development, and it is continued and consolidated by naturalistic data once the drug is on the market. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3181998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Les Laboratoires Servier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31819982011-10-27 Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence Curtin, François Schulz, Pierre Dialogues Clin Neurosci Clinical Research Randomized evidence from clinical trials and naturalistic evidence collected from pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance activities both contribute to the initial and continuous assessment of the benefits and risks of a drug, ie, the balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety risks. Benefit-risk assessment (BRA) mainly relies on a qualitative assessment of quantitative data. Current attempts to quantify BRA are reviewed and discussed, along with the expectations of regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. No method provides a fully satisfactory solution regarding BRA, because it is difficult to reduce its multidimensional aspect to simple metrics, in a context where other therapeutic alternatives play a role. Consistency and transparency are key in this assessment, which is performed throughout the whole drug life cycle. BRA is mainly based on randomized clinical studies during clinical development, and it is continued and consolidated by naturalistic data once the drug is on the market. Les Laboratoires Servier 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3181998/ /pubmed/21842615 Text en Copyright: © 2011 LLS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Curtin, François Schulz, Pierre Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title | Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title_full | Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title_fullStr | Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title_short | Assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
title_sort | assessing the benefit:risk ratio of a drug - randomized and naturalistic evidence |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21842615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT curtinfrancois assessingthebenefitriskratioofadrugrandomizedandnaturalisticevidence AT schulzpierre assessingthebenefitriskratioofadrugrandomizedandnaturalisticevidence |