Cargando…

Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain

The validity of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ (1-42)) intrahippocampal injection, as an animal model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), has previously been considered in terms of inflammatory reactivity and neuronal damage. In this work, we have extended the testing of the animal model to vasculature by comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jantaratnotai, Nattinee, Ryu, Jae K., Schwab, Claudia, McGeer, Patrick L., McLarnon, James G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21969915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280
_version_ 1782212929990426624
author Jantaratnotai, Nattinee
Ryu, Jae K.
Schwab, Claudia
McGeer, Patrick L.
McLarnon, James G.
author_facet Jantaratnotai, Nattinee
Ryu, Jae K.
Schwab, Claudia
McGeer, Patrick L.
McLarnon, James G.
author_sort Jantaratnotai, Nattinee
collection PubMed
description The validity of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ (1-42)) intrahippocampal injection, as an animal model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), has previously been considered in terms of inflammatory reactivity and neuronal damage. In this work, we have extended the testing of the animal model to vasculature by comparison of selected properties of microvessels in vivo with those in human AD brain tissue. The injection of Aβ (1-42), relative to control PBS (phosphate buffered saline), increased the mean number of microvessels and diminished the mean length of microvessels in the molecular layer of dentate gyrus. The animal model showed Aβ (1-42), but not PBS, injection was associated with abnormalities in morphology of microvessels which were characterized as looping, fragmented, knob-like, uneven, and constricted. In particular, numbers of constricted microvessels, defined as vessels with diameters less than 3 μm, were considerably enhanced for Aβ (1-42), compared to PBS, injection. In comparison, human AD brain demonstrated an elevated number of microvessels with a diminished mean length relative to nondemented (ND) brain. Additionally, microvessel perturbations in AD brain showed a similar pattern of morphological abnormalities to those observed in Aβ (1-42)-injected rat hippocampus. Constricted microvessels were a prominent feature of AD brain but were rarely observed in ND tissue. These results provide the first evidence that a peptide-injection animal model exhibits a commonality in perturbations of microvessels compared with those evident in AD brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3182764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31827642011-10-03 Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain Jantaratnotai, Nattinee Ryu, Jae K. Schwab, Claudia McGeer, Patrick L. McLarnon, James G. Int J Alzheimers Dis Research Article The validity of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ (1-42)) intrahippocampal injection, as an animal model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), has previously been considered in terms of inflammatory reactivity and neuronal damage. In this work, we have extended the testing of the animal model to vasculature by comparison of selected properties of microvessels in vivo with those in human AD brain tissue. The injection of Aβ (1-42), relative to control PBS (phosphate buffered saline), increased the mean number of microvessels and diminished the mean length of microvessels in the molecular layer of dentate gyrus. The animal model showed Aβ (1-42), but not PBS, injection was associated with abnormalities in morphology of microvessels which were characterized as looping, fragmented, knob-like, uneven, and constricted. In particular, numbers of constricted microvessels, defined as vessels with diameters less than 3 μm, were considerably enhanced for Aβ (1-42), compared to PBS, injection. In comparison, human AD brain demonstrated an elevated number of microvessels with a diminished mean length relative to nondemented (ND) brain. Additionally, microvessel perturbations in AD brain showed a similar pattern of morphological abnormalities to those observed in Aβ (1-42)-injected rat hippocampus. Constricted microvessels were a prominent feature of AD brain but were rarely observed in ND tissue. These results provide the first evidence that a peptide-injection animal model exhibits a commonality in perturbations of microvessels compared with those evident in AD brain. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011 2011-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3182764/ /pubmed/21969915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280 Text en Copyright © 2011 Nattinee Jantaratnotai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jantaratnotai, Nattinee
Ryu, Jae K.
Schwab, Claudia
McGeer, Patrick L.
McLarnon, James G.
Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title_full Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title_fullStr Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title_short Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain
title_sort comparison of vascular perturbations in an aβ-injected animal model and in ad brain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21969915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280
work_keys_str_mv AT jantaratnotainattinee comparisonofvascularperturbationsinanabinjectedanimalmodelandinadbrain
AT ryujaek comparisonofvascularperturbationsinanabinjectedanimalmodelandinadbrain
AT schwabclaudia comparisonofvascularperturbationsinanabinjectedanimalmodelandinadbrain
AT mcgeerpatrickl comparisonofvascularperturbationsinanabinjectedanimalmodelandinadbrain
AT mclarnonjamesg comparisonofvascularperturbationsinanabinjectedanimalmodelandinadbrain