Cargando…

A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions

BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparoto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harlaar, Joris J, Deerenberg, Eva B, van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H, Lont, Harold E, van der Borst, Ed CMH, Schouten, Willem R, Heisterkamp, Joos, van Doorn, Helena C, Cense, Huib A, Berends, Frits, Stockmann, Hein BAC, Vrijland, Wietske W, Consten, Esther CJ, Ottow, Reyer T, Go, Peter MNYH, Hermans, John J, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Lange, Johan F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21871072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20
_version_ 1782212936571289600
author Harlaar, Joris J
Deerenberg, Eva B
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H
Lont, Harold E
van der Borst, Ed CMH
Schouten, Willem R
Heisterkamp, Joos
van Doorn, Helena C
Cense, Huib A
Berends, Frits
Stockmann, Hein BAC
Vrijland, Wietske W
Consten, Esther CJ
Ottow, Reyer T
Go, Peter MNYH
Hermans, John J
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Lange, Johan F
author_facet Harlaar, Joris J
Deerenberg, Eva B
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H
Lont, Harold E
van der Borst, Ed CMH
Schouten, Willem R
Heisterkamp, Joos
van Doorn, Helena C
Cense, Huib A
Berends, Frits
Stockmann, Hein BAC
Vrijland, Wietske W
Consten, Esther CJ
Ottow, Reyer T
Go, Peter MNYH
Hermans, John J
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Lange, Johan F
author_sort Harlaar, Joris J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure. METHODS/DESIGN: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3182877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31828772011-09-30 A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions Harlaar, Joris J Deerenberg, Eva B van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H Lont, Harold E van der Borst, Ed CMH Schouten, Willem R Heisterkamp, Joos van Doorn, Helena C Cense, Huib A Berends, Frits Stockmann, Hein BAC Vrijland, Wietske W Consten, Esther CJ Ottow, Reyer T Go, Peter MNYH Hermans, John J Steyerberg, Ewout W Lange, Johan F BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure. METHODS/DESIGN: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209 BioMed Central 2011-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3182877/ /pubmed/21871072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harlaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Harlaar, Joris J
Deerenberg, Eva B
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H
Lont, Harold E
van der Borst, Ed CMH
Schouten, Willem R
Heisterkamp, Joos
van Doorn, Helena C
Cense, Huib A
Berends, Frits
Stockmann, Hein BAC
Vrijland, Wietske W
Consten, Esther CJ
Ottow, Reyer T
Go, Peter MNYH
Hermans, John J
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Lange, Johan F
A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title_full A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title_fullStr A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title_short A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
title_sort multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21871072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20
work_keys_str_mv AT harlaarjorisj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT deerenbergevab amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vanramshorstgabrielleh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT lontharolde amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vanderborstedcmh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT schoutenwillemr amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT heisterkampjoos amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vandoornhelenac amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT censehuiba amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT berendsfrits amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT stockmannheinbac amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vrijlandwietskew amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT constenesthercj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT ottowreyert amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT gopetermnyh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT hermansjohnj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT steyerbergewoutw amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT langejohanf amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT harlaarjorisj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT deerenbergevab multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vanramshorstgabrielleh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT lontharolde multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vanderborstedcmh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT schoutenwillemr multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT heisterkampjoos multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vandoornhelenac multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT censehuiba multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT berendsfrits multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT stockmannheinbac multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT vrijlandwietskew multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT constenesthercj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT ottowreyert multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT gopetermnyh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT hermansjohnj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT steyerbergewoutw multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions
AT langejohanf multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions