Cargando…
A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions
BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparoto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21871072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20 |
_version_ | 1782212936571289600 |
---|---|
author | Harlaar, Joris J Deerenberg, Eva B van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H Lont, Harold E van der Borst, Ed CMH Schouten, Willem R Heisterkamp, Joos van Doorn, Helena C Cense, Huib A Berends, Frits Stockmann, Hein BAC Vrijland, Wietske W Consten, Esther CJ Ottow, Reyer T Go, Peter MNYH Hermans, John J Steyerberg, Ewout W Lange, Johan F |
author_facet | Harlaar, Joris J Deerenberg, Eva B van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H Lont, Harold E van der Borst, Ed CMH Schouten, Willem R Heisterkamp, Joos van Doorn, Helena C Cense, Huib A Berends, Frits Stockmann, Hein BAC Vrijland, Wietske W Consten, Esther CJ Ottow, Reyer T Go, Peter MNYH Hermans, John J Steyerberg, Ewout W Lange, Johan F |
author_sort | Harlaar, Joris J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure. METHODS/DESIGN: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3182877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31828772011-09-30 A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions Harlaar, Joris J Deerenberg, Eva B van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H Lont, Harold E van der Borst, Ed CMH Schouten, Willem R Heisterkamp, Joos van Doorn, Helena C Cense, Huib A Berends, Frits Stockmann, Hein BAC Vrijland, Wietske W Consten, Esther CJ Ottow, Reyer T Go, Peter MNYH Hermans, John J Steyerberg, Ewout W Lange, Johan F BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure. METHODS/DESIGN: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209 BioMed Central 2011-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3182877/ /pubmed/21871072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harlaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Harlaar, Joris J Deerenberg, Eva B van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H Lont, Harold E van der Borst, Ed CMH Schouten, Willem R Heisterkamp, Joos van Doorn, Helena C Cense, Huib A Berends, Frits Stockmann, Hein BAC Vrijland, Wietske W Consten, Esther CJ Ottow, Reyer T Go, Peter MNYH Hermans, John J Steyerberg, Ewout W Lange, Johan F A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title | A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title_full | A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title_fullStr | A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title_short | A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
title_sort | multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21871072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harlaarjorisj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT deerenbergevab amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vanramshorstgabrielleh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT lontharolde amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vanderborstedcmh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT schoutenwillemr amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT heisterkampjoos amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vandoornhelenac amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT censehuiba amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT berendsfrits amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT stockmannheinbac amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vrijlandwietskew amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT constenesthercj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT ottowreyert amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT gopetermnyh amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT hermansjohnj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT steyerbergewoutw amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT langejohanf amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT harlaarjorisj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT deerenbergevab multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vanramshorstgabrielleh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT lontharolde multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vanderborstedcmh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT schoutenwillemr multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT heisterkampjoos multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vandoornhelenac multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT censehuiba multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT berendsfrits multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT stockmannheinbac multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT vrijlandwietskew multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT constenesthercj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT ottowreyert multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT gopetermnyh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT hermansjohnj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT steyerbergewoutw multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions AT langejohanf multicenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectofsmallstitchesontheincidenceofincisionalherniainmidlineincisions |