Cargando…
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become an important experimental tool for exploring the brain's functional anatomy. As TMS interferes with neural activity, the hypothetical function of the stimulated area can thus be tested. One unresolved methodological issue in TMS exp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21980359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024836 |
_version_ | 1782212961641693184 |
---|---|
author | Kaminski, Jakob A. Korb, Franziska M. Villringer, Arno Ott, Derek V. M. |
author_facet | Kaminski, Jakob A. Korb, Franziska M. Villringer, Arno Ott, Derek V. M. |
author_sort | Kaminski, Jakob A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become an important experimental tool for exploring the brain's functional anatomy. As TMS interferes with neural activity, the hypothetical function of the stimulated area can thus be tested. One unresolved methodological issue in TMS experiments is the question of how to adequately calibrate stimulation intensities. The motor threshold (MT) is often taken as a reference for individually adapted stimulation intensities in TMS experiments, even if they do not involve the motor system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether it is reasonable to adjust stimulation intensities in each subject to the individual MT if prefrontal regions are stimulated prior to the performance of a cognitive paradigm. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Repetitive TMS (rTMS) was applied prior to a working memory task, either at the ‘fixed’ intensity of 40% maximum stimulator output (MSO), or individually adapted at 90% of the subject's MT. Stimulation was applied to a target region in the left posterior middle frontal gyrus (pMFG), as indicated by a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) localizer acquired beforehand, or to a control site (vertex). Results show that MT predicted the effect size after stimulating subjects with the fixed intensity (i.e., subjects with a low MT showed a greater behavioral effect). Nevertheless, the individual adaptation of intensities did not lead to stable effects. CONCLUSION: Therefore, we suggest assessing MT and account for it as a measure for general cortical TMS susceptibility, even if TMS is applied outside the motor domain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3182987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31829872011-10-06 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms Kaminski, Jakob A. Korb, Franziska M. Villringer, Arno Ott, Derek V. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become an important experimental tool for exploring the brain's functional anatomy. As TMS interferes with neural activity, the hypothetical function of the stimulated area can thus be tested. One unresolved methodological issue in TMS experiments is the question of how to adequately calibrate stimulation intensities. The motor threshold (MT) is often taken as a reference for individually adapted stimulation intensities in TMS experiments, even if they do not involve the motor system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether it is reasonable to adjust stimulation intensities in each subject to the individual MT if prefrontal regions are stimulated prior to the performance of a cognitive paradigm. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Repetitive TMS (rTMS) was applied prior to a working memory task, either at the ‘fixed’ intensity of 40% maximum stimulator output (MSO), or individually adapted at 90% of the subject's MT. Stimulation was applied to a target region in the left posterior middle frontal gyrus (pMFG), as indicated by a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) localizer acquired beforehand, or to a control site (vertex). Results show that MT predicted the effect size after stimulating subjects with the fixed intensity (i.e., subjects with a low MT showed a greater behavioral effect). Nevertheless, the individual adaptation of intensities did not lead to stable effects. CONCLUSION: Therefore, we suggest assessing MT and account for it as a measure for general cortical TMS susceptibility, even if TMS is applied outside the motor domain. Public Library of Science 2011-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3182987/ /pubmed/21980359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024836 Text en Kaminski et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaminski, Jakob A. Korb, Franziska M. Villringer, Arno Ott, Derek V. M. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title_full | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title_fullStr | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title_short | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive Paradigms |
title_sort | transcranial magnetic stimulation intensities in cognitive paradigms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21980359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaminskijakoba transcranialmagneticstimulationintensitiesincognitiveparadigms AT korbfranziskam transcranialmagneticstimulationintensitiesincognitiveparadigms AT villringerarno transcranialmagneticstimulationintensitiesincognitiveparadigms AT ottderekvm transcranialmagneticstimulationintensitiesincognitiveparadigms |