Cargando…
Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia is usually preferred as caudal block via the epidural space. However, the number of large-scale studies including pediatric caudal blocks is small. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and side effects of local anesthetics and adjuv...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21911987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.84627 |
_version_ | 1782213028881629184 |
---|---|
author | Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan Tokgöz, Orhan Tüfek, Adnan |
author_facet | Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan Tokgöz, Orhan Tüfek, Adnan |
author_sort | Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia is usually preferred as caudal block via the epidural space. However, the number of large-scale studies including pediatric caudal blocks is small. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and side effects of local anesthetics and adjuvant drugs. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, descriptive study of cases occurring during the period December 2007 to October 2009. METHODS: Of 4815 medical records were screened, 2088 pediatric cases were identified and included in this study. RESULTS: As a local anesthetic, we preferred mostly levobupivacaine in 1669 (79.9%) patients and bupivacaine in 419 (20.1%) patients. As adjuvant drug, we preferred mostly morphine (41 patients), fentanyl (7 patients) and adrenaline (6 patients) in 54 (2.5%) patients. For general anesthesia induction, we preferred mostly propofol (1996 patients, 94.2%); for maintenance, sevoflurane (1773 patients, 84.9%). For airway control, we preferred mostly the ProSeal laryngeal mask (PLMA), in 1008 (48.2%) patients. One thousand six hundred five (76.9%) patients were from outpatient clinics and 483 (23.1%) patients were from inpatient clinics. No permanent complication was encountered after caudal blocks. CONCLUSION: We conclude that caudal epidural blocks are a safe and effective method for subumbilical day-case pediatric surgeries when performed by anesthetists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3183684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31836842011-10-05 Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan Tokgöz, Orhan Tüfek, Adnan Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia is usually preferred as caudal block via the epidural space. However, the number of large-scale studies including pediatric caudal blocks is small. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and side effects of local anesthetics and adjuvant drugs. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, descriptive study of cases occurring during the period December 2007 to October 2009. METHODS: Of 4815 medical records were screened, 2088 pediatric cases were identified and included in this study. RESULTS: As a local anesthetic, we preferred mostly levobupivacaine in 1669 (79.9%) patients and bupivacaine in 419 (20.1%) patients. As adjuvant drug, we preferred mostly morphine (41 patients), fentanyl (7 patients) and adrenaline (6 patients) in 54 (2.5%) patients. For general anesthesia induction, we preferred mostly propofol (1996 patients, 94.2%); for maintenance, sevoflurane (1773 patients, 84.9%). For airway control, we preferred mostly the ProSeal laryngeal mask (PLMA), in 1008 (48.2%) patients. One thousand six hundred five (76.9%) patients were from outpatient clinics and 483 (23.1%) patients were from inpatient clinics. No permanent complication was encountered after caudal blocks. CONCLUSION: We conclude that caudal epidural blocks are a safe and effective method for subumbilical day-case pediatric surgeries when performed by anesthetists. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3183684/ /pubmed/21911987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.84627 Text en © Annals of Saudi Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan Tokgöz, Orhan Tüfek, Adnan Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title_full | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title_fullStr | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title_short | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
title_sort | caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21911987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.84627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beyazserbulentgokhan caudalepiduralblockinchildrenandinfantsretrospectiveanalysisof2088cases AT tokgozorhan caudalepiduralblockinchildrenandinfantsretrospectiveanalysisof2088cases AT tufekadnan caudalepiduralblockinchildrenandinfantsretrospectiveanalysisof2088cases |