Cargando…
Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience
INTRODUCTION: The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is one of the most common causes of primary amenorrhoea and is associated with vaginal atresia and absent uterus despite the presence of normal ovaries and external genitalia. Various techniques have been used, with many disadvantages,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.85032 |
_version_ | 1782213035903942656 |
---|---|
author | Chakrabarty, Somajita Mukhopadhyay, Partha Mukherjee, Gouri |
author_facet | Chakrabarty, Somajita Mukhopadhyay, Partha Mukherjee, Gouri |
author_sort | Chakrabarty, Somajita |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is one of the most common causes of primary amenorrhoea and is associated with vaginal atresia and absent uterus despite the presence of normal ovaries and external genitalia. Various techniques have been used, with many disadvantages, to create a neovagina. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to create a neovagina with a simple and safe method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have operated 18 cases of MRKH syndrome with the Sheares’ method of vaginoplasty, in which the space between the two labia is dilated with a Hegar's dilator along the vestigial Mullerian ducts. Thus, two tunnels are created and the central septum is excised to form a single vagina. A mould covered with amnion is placed in the neovagina. All cases are followed up for six months. They have all had a good length of vagina with regular manual dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: The Sheares’ method of vaginoplasty is an easy and safe method to create a neovagina with least complications, like injury to urinary bladder, rectum or bleeding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3183716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31837162011-10-05 Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience Chakrabarty, Somajita Mukhopadhyay, Partha Mukherjee, Gouri J Cutan Aesthet Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is one of the most common causes of primary amenorrhoea and is associated with vaginal atresia and absent uterus despite the presence of normal ovaries and external genitalia. Various techniques have been used, with many disadvantages, to create a neovagina. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to create a neovagina with a simple and safe method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have operated 18 cases of MRKH syndrome with the Sheares’ method of vaginoplasty, in which the space between the two labia is dilated with a Hegar's dilator along the vestigial Mullerian ducts. Thus, two tunnels are created and the central septum is excised to form a single vagina. A mould covered with amnion is placed in the neovagina. All cases are followed up for six months. They have all had a good length of vagina with regular manual dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: The Sheares’ method of vaginoplasty is an easy and safe method to create a neovagina with least complications, like injury to urinary bladder, rectum or bleeding. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3183716/ /pubmed/21976903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.85032 Text en © Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chakrabarty, Somajita Mukhopadhyay, Partha Mukherjee, Gouri Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title | Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title_full | Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title_fullStr | Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title_short | Sheares’ Method of Vaginoplasty — Our Experience |
title_sort | sheares’ method of vaginoplasty — our experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976903 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.85032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chakrabartysomajita shearesmethodofvaginoplastyourexperience AT mukhopadhyaypartha shearesmethodofvaginoplastyourexperience AT mukherjeegouri shearesmethodofvaginoplastyourexperience |