Cargando…

Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care

BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) represent well-validated but underutilized evidence-based medicine tools at the point-of-care. To date, an inability to integrate these rules into an electronic health record (EHR) has been a major limitation and we are not aware of a study demonstrating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Devin M, Kannry, Joseph L, Edonyabo, Daniel, Li, Alice C, Arciniega, Jacqueline, Stulman, James, Romero, Lucas, Wisnivesky, Juan, Adler, Rhodes, McGinn, Thomas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21929769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-109
_version_ 1782213054950277120
author Mann, Devin M
Kannry, Joseph L
Edonyabo, Daniel
Li, Alice C
Arciniega, Jacqueline
Stulman, James
Romero, Lucas
Wisnivesky, Juan
Adler, Rhodes
McGinn, Thomas G
author_facet Mann, Devin M
Kannry, Joseph L
Edonyabo, Daniel
Li, Alice C
Arciniega, Jacqueline
Stulman, James
Romero, Lucas
Wisnivesky, Juan
Adler, Rhodes
McGinn, Thomas G
author_sort Mann, Devin M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) represent well-validated but underutilized evidence-based medicine tools at the point-of-care. To date, an inability to integrate these rules into an electronic health record (EHR) has been a major limitation and we are not aware of a study demonstrating the use of CPR's in an ambulatory EHR setting. The integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) trial integrates two CPR's in an EHR and assesses both the usability and the effect on evidence-based practice in the primary care setting. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary design team was assembled to develop a prototype iCPR for validated streptococcal pharyngitis and bacterial pneumonia CPRs. The iCPR tool was built as an active Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool that can be triggered by user action during typical workflow. Using the EHR CDS toolkit, the iCPR risk score calculator was linked to tailored ordered sets, documentation, and patient instructions. The team subsequently conducted two levels of 'real world' usability testing with eight providers per group. Usability data were used to refine and create a production tool. Participating primary care providers (n = 149) were randomized and intervention providers were trained in the use of the new iCPR tool. Rates of iCPR tool triggering in the intervention and control (simulated) groups are monitored and subsequent use of the various components of the iCPR tool among intervention encounters is also tracked. The primary outcome is the difference in antibiotic prescribing rates (strep and pneumonia iCPR's encounters) and chest x-rays (pneumonia iCPR only) between intervention and control providers. DISCUSSION: Using iterative usability testing and development paired with provider training, the iCPR CDS tool leverages user-centered design principles to overcome pervasive underutilization of EBM and support evidence-based practice at the point-of-care. The ongoing trial will determine if this collaborative process will lead to higher rates of utilization and EBM guided use of antibiotics and chest x-ray's in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01386047
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3184082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31840822011-10-01 Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care Mann, Devin M Kannry, Joseph L Edonyabo, Daniel Li, Alice C Arciniega, Jacqueline Stulman, James Romero, Lucas Wisnivesky, Juan Adler, Rhodes McGinn, Thomas G Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) represent well-validated but underutilized evidence-based medicine tools at the point-of-care. To date, an inability to integrate these rules into an electronic health record (EHR) has been a major limitation and we are not aware of a study demonstrating the use of CPR's in an ambulatory EHR setting. The integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) trial integrates two CPR's in an EHR and assesses both the usability and the effect on evidence-based practice in the primary care setting. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary design team was assembled to develop a prototype iCPR for validated streptococcal pharyngitis and bacterial pneumonia CPRs. The iCPR tool was built as an active Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool that can be triggered by user action during typical workflow. Using the EHR CDS toolkit, the iCPR risk score calculator was linked to tailored ordered sets, documentation, and patient instructions. The team subsequently conducted two levels of 'real world' usability testing with eight providers per group. Usability data were used to refine and create a production tool. Participating primary care providers (n = 149) were randomized and intervention providers were trained in the use of the new iCPR tool. Rates of iCPR tool triggering in the intervention and control (simulated) groups are monitored and subsequent use of the various components of the iCPR tool among intervention encounters is also tracked. The primary outcome is the difference in antibiotic prescribing rates (strep and pneumonia iCPR's encounters) and chest x-rays (pneumonia iCPR only) between intervention and control providers. DISCUSSION: Using iterative usability testing and development paired with provider training, the iCPR CDS tool leverages user-centered design principles to overcome pervasive underutilization of EBM and support evidence-based practice at the point-of-care. The ongoing trial will determine if this collaborative process will lead to higher rates of utilization and EBM guided use of antibiotics and chest x-ray's in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01386047 BioMed Central 2011-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3184082/ /pubmed/21929769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-109 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mann, Devin M
Kannry, Joseph L
Edonyabo, Daniel
Li, Alice C
Arciniega, Jacqueline
Stulman, James
Romero, Lucas
Wisnivesky, Juan
Adler, Rhodes
McGinn, Thomas G
Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title_full Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title_fullStr Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title_short Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) randomized trial in primary care
title_sort rationale, design, and implementation protocol of an electronic health record integrated clinical prediction rule (icpr) randomized trial in primary care
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21929769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-109
work_keys_str_mv AT manndevinm rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT kannryjosephl rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT edonyabodaniel rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT lialicec rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT arciniegajacqueline rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT stulmanjames rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT romerolucas rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT wisniveskyjuan rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT adlerrhodes rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare
AT mcginnthomasg rationaledesignandimplementationprotocolofanelectronichealthrecordintegratedclinicalpredictionruleicprrandomizedtrialinprimarycare