Cargando…
Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles
OBJECTIVE: To explore the capacity of human CD14(+)CD16(++) and CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes to phagocyte iron-oxide nanoparticles in vitro. METHODS: Human monocytes were labeled with four different magnetic nanoparticle preparations (Ferumoxides, SHU 555C, CLIO-680, MION-48) exhibiting distinct proper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21984904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025197 |
_version_ | 1782213163209457664 |
---|---|
author | Settles, Marcus Etzrodt, Martin Kosanke, Katja Schiemann, Matthias Zimmermann, Alexander Meier, Reinhard Braren, Rickmer Huber, Armin Rummeny, Ernst J. Weissleder, Ralph Swirski, Filip K. Wildgruber, Moritz |
author_facet | Settles, Marcus Etzrodt, Martin Kosanke, Katja Schiemann, Matthias Zimmermann, Alexander Meier, Reinhard Braren, Rickmer Huber, Armin Rummeny, Ernst J. Weissleder, Ralph Swirski, Filip K. Wildgruber, Moritz |
author_sort | Settles, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the capacity of human CD14(+)CD16(++) and CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes to phagocyte iron-oxide nanoparticles in vitro. METHODS: Human monocytes were labeled with four different magnetic nanoparticle preparations (Ferumoxides, SHU 555C, CLIO-680, MION-48) exhibiting distinct properties and cellular uptake was quantitatively assessed by flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, atomic absorption spectrometry and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Additionally we determined whether cellular uptake of the nanoparticles resulted in phenotypic changes of cell surface markers. RESULTS: Cellular uptake differed between the four nanoparticle preparations. However for each nanoparticle tested, CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes displayed a significantly higher uptake compared to CD14(+)CD16(++) monocytes, this resulted in significantly lower T1 and T2 relaxation times of these cells. The uptake of iron-oxide nanoparticles further resulted in a remarkable shift of expression of cell surface proteins indicating that the labeling procedure affects the phenotype of CD14(+)CD16(++) and CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes differently. CONCLUSION: Human monocyte subsets internalize different magnetic nanoparticle preparations differently, resulting in variable loading capacities, imaging phenotypes and likely biological properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3184946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31849462011-10-07 Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles Settles, Marcus Etzrodt, Martin Kosanke, Katja Schiemann, Matthias Zimmermann, Alexander Meier, Reinhard Braren, Rickmer Huber, Armin Rummeny, Ernst J. Weissleder, Ralph Swirski, Filip K. Wildgruber, Moritz PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the capacity of human CD14(+)CD16(++) and CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes to phagocyte iron-oxide nanoparticles in vitro. METHODS: Human monocytes were labeled with four different magnetic nanoparticle preparations (Ferumoxides, SHU 555C, CLIO-680, MION-48) exhibiting distinct properties and cellular uptake was quantitatively assessed by flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, atomic absorption spectrometry and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Additionally we determined whether cellular uptake of the nanoparticles resulted in phenotypic changes of cell surface markers. RESULTS: Cellular uptake differed between the four nanoparticle preparations. However for each nanoparticle tested, CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes displayed a significantly higher uptake compared to CD14(+)CD16(++) monocytes, this resulted in significantly lower T1 and T2 relaxation times of these cells. The uptake of iron-oxide nanoparticles further resulted in a remarkable shift of expression of cell surface proteins indicating that the labeling procedure affects the phenotype of CD14(+)CD16(++) and CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes differently. CONCLUSION: Human monocyte subsets internalize different magnetic nanoparticle preparations differently, resulting in variable loading capacities, imaging phenotypes and likely biological properties. Public Library of Science 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3184946/ /pubmed/21984904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025197 Text en Settles et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Settles, Marcus Etzrodt, Martin Kosanke, Katja Schiemann, Matthias Zimmermann, Alexander Meier, Reinhard Braren, Rickmer Huber, Armin Rummeny, Ernst J. Weissleder, Ralph Swirski, Filip K. Wildgruber, Moritz Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title | Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title_full | Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title_fullStr | Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title_short | Different Capacity of Monocyte Subsets to Phagocytose Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles |
title_sort | different capacity of monocyte subsets to phagocytose iron-oxide nanoparticles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21984904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT settlesmarcus differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT etzrodtmartin differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT kosankekatja differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT schiemannmatthias differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT zimmermannalexander differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT meierreinhard differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT brarenrickmer differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT huberarmin differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT rummenyernstj differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT weisslederralph differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT swirskifilipk differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles AT wildgrubermoritz differentcapacityofmonocytesubsetstophagocytoseironoxidenanoparticles |