Cargando…

Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce COPD exacerbation frequency and slow decline in health related quality of life but have little effect on lung function, do not reduce mortality, and increase the risk of pneumonia. We systematically reviewed trials in which ICS have been withdrawn from patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadeem, Nighat J, Taylor, Stephanie JC, Eldridge, Sandra M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-107
_version_ 1782213199070756864
author Nadeem, Nighat J
Taylor, Stephanie JC
Eldridge, Sandra M
author_facet Nadeem, Nighat J
Taylor, Stephanie JC
Eldridge, Sandra M
author_sort Nadeem, Nighat J
collection PubMed
description Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce COPD exacerbation frequency and slow decline in health related quality of life but have little effect on lung function, do not reduce mortality, and increase the risk of pneumonia. We systematically reviewed trials in which ICS have been withdrawn from patients with COPD, with the aim of determining the effect of withdrawal, understanding the differing results between trials, and making recommendations for improving methodology in future trials where medication is withdrawn. Trials were identified by two independent reviewers using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, citations of identified studies were checked, and experts contacted to identify further studies. Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of each trial was determined by assessing possible sources of systematic bias as recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. We included four trials; the quality of three was adequate. In all trials, outcomes were generally worse for patients who had had ICS withdrawn, but differences between outcomes for these patients and patients who continued with medication were mostly small and not statistically significant. Due to data paucity we performed only one meta-analysis; this indicated that patients who had had medication withdrawn were 1.11 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.46) times more likely to have an exacerbation in the following year, but the definition of exacerbations was not consistent between the three trials, and the impact of withdrawal was smaller in recent trials which were also trials conducted under conditions that reflected routine practice. There is no evidence from this review that withdrawing ICS in routine practice results in important deterioration in patient outcomes. Furthermore, the extent of increase in exacerbations depends on the way exacerbations are defined and managed and may depend on the use of other medication. In trials where medication is withdrawn, investigators should report other medication use, definitions of exacerbations and management of patients clearly. Intention to treat analyses should be used and interpreted appropriately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3185272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31852722011-10-05 Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology Nadeem, Nighat J Taylor, Stephanie JC Eldridge, Sandra M Respir Res Review Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce COPD exacerbation frequency and slow decline in health related quality of life but have little effect on lung function, do not reduce mortality, and increase the risk of pneumonia. We systematically reviewed trials in which ICS have been withdrawn from patients with COPD, with the aim of determining the effect of withdrawal, understanding the differing results between trials, and making recommendations for improving methodology in future trials where medication is withdrawn. Trials were identified by two independent reviewers using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, citations of identified studies were checked, and experts contacted to identify further studies. Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of each trial was determined by assessing possible sources of systematic bias as recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. We included four trials; the quality of three was adequate. In all trials, outcomes were generally worse for patients who had had ICS withdrawn, but differences between outcomes for these patients and patients who continued with medication were mostly small and not statistically significant. Due to data paucity we performed only one meta-analysis; this indicated that patients who had had medication withdrawn were 1.11 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.46) times more likely to have an exacerbation in the following year, but the definition of exacerbations was not consistent between the three trials, and the impact of withdrawal was smaller in recent trials which were also trials conducted under conditions that reflected routine practice. There is no evidence from this review that withdrawing ICS in routine practice results in important deterioration in patient outcomes. Furthermore, the extent of increase in exacerbations depends on the way exacerbations are defined and managed and may depend on the use of other medication. In trials where medication is withdrawn, investigators should report other medication use, definitions of exacerbations and management of patients clearly. Intention to treat analyses should be used and interpreted appropriately. BioMed Central 2011 2011-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3185272/ /pubmed/21838890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-107 Text en Copyright ©2011 Nadeem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Nadeem, Nighat J
Taylor, Stephanie JC
Eldridge, Sandra M
Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title_full Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title_fullStr Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title_full_unstemmed Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title_short Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
title_sort withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with copd - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-107
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeemnighatj withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinindividualswithcopdasystematicreviewandcommentontrialmethodology
AT taylorstephaniejc withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinindividualswithcopdasystematicreviewandcommentontrialmethodology
AT eldridgesandram withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinindividualswithcopdasystematicreviewandcommentontrialmethodology