Cargando…
Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21878940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.332 |
_version_ | 1782213281653456896 |
---|---|
author | Mita, A C Papadopoulos, K de Jonge, M J A Schwartz, G Verweij, J Mita, M M Ricart, A Chu, Q S-C Tolcher, A W Wood, L McCarthy, S Hamilton, M Iwata, K Wacker, B Witt, K Rowinsky, E K |
author_facet | Mita, A C Papadopoulos, K de Jonge, M J A Schwartz, G Verweij, J Mita, M M Ricart, A Chu, Q S-C Tolcher, A W Wood, L McCarthy, S Hamilton, M Iwata, K Wacker, B Witt, K Rowinsky, E K |
author_sort | Mita, A C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of higher doses of erlotinib. METHODS: Patients initially received erlotinib 150 mg per day. The dose was successively increased in each patient to that associated with a TR. Anticancer activity was evaluated. Plasma, skin, and hair were sampled for PK and PD studies. RESULTS: Erlotinib dose escalation to 200–475 mg per day was feasible in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. Twenty-four (57%) patients developed a TR, but 19 (79%) did so at 150 mg per day. Five (12%) patients, all of whom developed a TR, had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.61, 4.14); median PFS was 3.5 months and 1.9 months, respectively, for patients who did and did not experience a TR (hazard ratio, 0.51; P=0.051). Neither rash severity nor response correlated with erlotinib exposure. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose escalation of erlotinib does not appreciably increase the propensity to experience a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity, or appear to increase the anticancer activity of erlotinib in NSCLC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3185947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31859472012-09-27 Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer Mita, A C Papadopoulos, K de Jonge, M J A Schwartz, G Verweij, J Mita, M M Ricart, A Chu, Q S-C Tolcher, A W Wood, L McCarthy, S Hamilton, M Iwata, K Wacker, B Witt, K Rowinsky, E K Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of higher doses of erlotinib. METHODS: Patients initially received erlotinib 150 mg per day. The dose was successively increased in each patient to that associated with a TR. Anticancer activity was evaluated. Plasma, skin, and hair were sampled for PK and PD studies. RESULTS: Erlotinib dose escalation to 200–475 mg per day was feasible in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. Twenty-four (57%) patients developed a TR, but 19 (79%) did so at 150 mg per day. Five (12%) patients, all of whom developed a TR, had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.61, 4.14); median PFS was 3.5 months and 1.9 months, respectively, for patients who did and did not experience a TR (hazard ratio, 0.51; P=0.051). Neither rash severity nor response correlated with erlotinib exposure. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose escalation of erlotinib does not appreciably increase the propensity to experience a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity, or appear to increase the anticancer activity of erlotinib in NSCLC. Nature Publishing Group 2011-09-27 2011-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3185947/ /pubmed/21878940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.332 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Mita, A C Papadopoulos, K de Jonge, M J A Schwartz, G Verweij, J Mita, M M Ricart, A Chu, Q S-C Tolcher, A W Wood, L McCarthy, S Hamilton, M Iwata, K Wacker, B Witt, K Rowinsky, E K Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title | Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full | Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_short | Erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | erlotinib ‘dosing-to-rash’: a phase ii intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21878940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitaac erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT papadopoulosk erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT dejongemja erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT schwartzg erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT verweijj erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT mitamm erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT ricarta erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT chuqsc erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT tolcheraw erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT woodl erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT mccarthys erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT hamiltonm erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT iwatak erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT wackerb erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT wittk erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT rowinskyek erlotinibdosingtorashaphaseiiintrapatientdoseescalationandpharmacologicstudyoferlotinibinpreviouslytreatedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer |