Cargando…

Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, P K H, Machin, D, Chen, Y, Zhang, X, Win, K-M, Hoang, H-H, Nguyen, B-D, Jin, M-Y, Lobo, R, Findlay, M, Lim, C-H, Tan, S-B, Gandhi, M, Soo, K-C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333
_version_ 1782213281885192192
author Chow, P K H
Machin, D
Chen, Y
Zhang, X
Win, K-M
Hoang, H-H
Nguyen, B-D
Jin, M-Y
Lobo, R
Findlay, M
Lim, C-H
Tan, S-B
Gandhi, M
Soo, K-C
author_facet Chow, P K H
Machin, D
Chen, Y
Zhang, X
Win, K-M
Hoang, H-H
Nguyen, B-D
Jin, M-Y
Lobo, R
Findlay, M
Lim, C-H
Tan, S-B
Gandhi, M
Soo, K-C
author_sort Chow, P K H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced HCC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance rating of 0-3) from specialist care centres in six Asia-Pacific nations. Patients received placebo or MA (320 mg day(−1)). End points were overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: An adverse but not statistically significant difference in OS was found for MA vs placebo: median values 1.88 and 2.14 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI=0.92–1.71, P=0.16). However, OS was similar among patients of good functional status (Child-Pugh A and ECOG 0, 1 or 2) (44.3%) in both treatment groups, with the adverse effect of MA confined to those of poor status. Megestrol acetate patients had a worse global health status (not statistically significant) but reduced levels of appetite loss and nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate has no role in prolonging OS in advanced treatment-naive HCC. Overall survival with placebo differed markedly from that in similar trials conducted elsewhere, suggesting therapeutic outcomes may be strongly dependent on ECOG status and Child-Pugh score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3185948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31859482011-10-21 Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Chow, P K H Machin, D Chen, Y Zhang, X Win, K-M Hoang, H-H Nguyen, B-D Jin, M-Y Lobo, R Findlay, M Lim, C-H Tan, S-B Gandhi, M Soo, K-C Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced HCC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance rating of 0-3) from specialist care centres in six Asia-Pacific nations. Patients received placebo or MA (320 mg day(−1)). End points were overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: An adverse but not statistically significant difference in OS was found for MA vs placebo: median values 1.88 and 2.14 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI=0.92–1.71, P=0.16). However, OS was similar among patients of good functional status (Child-Pugh A and ECOG 0, 1 or 2) (44.3%) in both treatment groups, with the adverse effect of MA confined to those of poor status. Megestrol acetate patients had a worse global health status (not statistically significant) but reduced levels of appetite loss and nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate has no role in prolonging OS in advanced treatment-naive HCC. Overall survival with placebo differed markedly from that in similar trials conducted elsewhere, suggesting therapeutic outcomes may be strongly dependent on ECOG status and Child-Pugh score. Nature Publishing Group 2011-09-27 2011-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3185948/ /pubmed/21863030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Chow, P K H
Machin, D
Chen, Y
Zhang, X
Win, K-M
Hoang, H-H
Nguyen, B-D
Jin, M-Y
Lobo, R
Findlay, M
Lim, C-H
Tan, S-B
Gandhi, M
Soo, K-C
Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333
work_keys_str_mv AT chowpkh randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT machind randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cheny randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhangx randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT winkm randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hoanghh randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT nguyenbd randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT jinmy randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lobor randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT findlaym randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT limch randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tansb randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT gandhim randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sookc randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma