Cargando…
Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333 |
_version_ | 1782213281885192192 |
---|---|
author | Chow, P K H Machin, D Chen, Y Zhang, X Win, K-M Hoang, H-H Nguyen, B-D Jin, M-Y Lobo, R Findlay, M Lim, C-H Tan, S-B Gandhi, M Soo, K-C |
author_facet | Chow, P K H Machin, D Chen, Y Zhang, X Win, K-M Hoang, H-H Nguyen, B-D Jin, M-Y Lobo, R Findlay, M Lim, C-H Tan, S-B Gandhi, M Soo, K-C |
author_sort | Chow, P K H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced HCC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance rating of 0-3) from specialist care centres in six Asia-Pacific nations. Patients received placebo or MA (320 mg day(−1)). End points were overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: An adverse but not statistically significant difference in OS was found for MA vs placebo: median values 1.88 and 2.14 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI=0.92–1.71, P=0.16). However, OS was similar among patients of good functional status (Child-Pugh A and ECOG 0, 1 or 2) (44.3%) in both treatment groups, with the adverse effect of MA confined to those of poor status. Megestrol acetate patients had a worse global health status (not statistically significant) but reduced levels of appetite loss and nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate has no role in prolonging OS in advanced treatment-naive HCC. Overall survival with placebo differed markedly from that in similar trials conducted elsewhere, suggesting therapeutic outcomes may be strongly dependent on ECOG status and Child-Pugh score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3185948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31859482011-10-21 Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Chow, P K H Machin, D Chen, Y Zhang, X Win, K-M Hoang, H-H Nguyen, B-D Jin, M-Y Lobo, R Findlay, M Lim, C-H Tan, S-B Gandhi, M Soo, K-C Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We tested megestrol acetate (MA) against placebo in the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: From 2002 through 2007, this randomised double-blind trial enrolled 204 patients with treatment-naive advanced HCC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance rating of 0-3) from specialist care centres in six Asia-Pacific nations. Patients received placebo or MA (320 mg day(−1)). End points were overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: An adverse but not statistically significant difference in OS was found for MA vs placebo: median values 1.88 and 2.14 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI=0.92–1.71, P=0.16). However, OS was similar among patients of good functional status (Child-Pugh A and ECOG 0, 1 or 2) (44.3%) in both treatment groups, with the adverse effect of MA confined to those of poor status. Megestrol acetate patients had a worse global health status (not statistically significant) but reduced levels of appetite loss and nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate has no role in prolonging OS in advanced treatment-naive HCC. Overall survival with placebo differed markedly from that in similar trials conducted elsewhere, suggesting therapeutic outcomes may be strongly dependent on ECOG status and Child-Pugh score. Nature Publishing Group 2011-09-27 2011-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3185948/ /pubmed/21863030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Chow, P K H Machin, D Chen, Y Zhang, X Win, K-M Hoang, H-H Nguyen, B-D Jin, M-Y Lobo, R Findlay, M Lim, C-H Tan, S-B Gandhi, M Soo, K-C Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | Randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | randomised double-blind trial of megestrol acetate vs placebo in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowpkh randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT machind randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cheny randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT zhangx randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT winkm randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT hoanghh randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT nguyenbd randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT jinmy randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT lobor randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT findlaym randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT limch randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT tansb randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT gandhim randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sookc randomiseddoubleblindtrialofmegestrolacetatevsplacebointreatmentnaiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma |