Cargando…

Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine

BACKGROUND: Three-dose regimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are expensive and difficult to complete, especially in settings where the need for cervical cancer prevention is greatest. METHODS: We evaluated the vaccine efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine Cervarix in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreimer, Aimée R., Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia, Hildesheim, Allan, Herrero, Rolando, Porras, Carolina, Schiffman, Mark, González, Paula, Solomon, Diane, Jiménez, Silvia, Schiller, John T., Lowy, Douglas R., Quint, Wim, Sherman, Mark E., Schussler, John, Wacholder, Sholom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3186781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21908768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr319
_version_ 1782213302387998720
author Kreimer, Aimée R.
Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia
Hildesheim, Allan
Herrero, Rolando
Porras, Carolina
Schiffman, Mark
González, Paula
Solomon, Diane
Jiménez, Silvia
Schiller, John T.
Lowy, Douglas R.
Quint, Wim
Sherman, Mark E.
Schussler, John
Wacholder, Sholom
author_facet Kreimer, Aimée R.
Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia
Hildesheim, Allan
Herrero, Rolando
Porras, Carolina
Schiffman, Mark
González, Paula
Solomon, Diane
Jiménez, Silvia
Schiller, John T.
Lowy, Douglas R.
Quint, Wim
Sherman, Mark E.
Schussler, John
Wacholder, Sholom
author_sort Kreimer, Aimée R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dose regimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are expensive and difficult to complete, especially in settings where the need for cervical cancer prevention is greatest. METHODS: We evaluated the vaccine efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine Cervarix in our Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. Women were randomly assigned to receive three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine and were followed for incident HPV16 or HPV18 infection that persisted in visits that were 10 or more months apart (median follow-up 4.2 years). After excluding women who had no follow-up or who were HPV16 and HPV18 DNA positive at enrollment, 5967 women received three vaccine doses (2957 HPV vaccine vs 3010 control vaccine), 802 received two doses (422 HPV vs 380 control), and 384 received one dose (196 HPV vs 188 control). Reasons for receiving fewer doses and other pre- and post-randomization characteristics were balanced within each dosage group between women receiving the HPV and control vaccines. RESULTS: Incident HPV16 or HPV18 infections that persisted for 1 year were unrelated to dosage of the control vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was 80.9% for three doses of the HPV vaccine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 71.1% to 87.7%; 25 and 133 events in the HPV and control arms, respectively), 84.1% for two doses (95% CI = 50.2% to 96.3%; 3 and 17 events), and 100% for one dose (95% CI = 66.5% to 100%; 0 and 10 events). CONCLUSION: Four years after vaccination of women who appeared to be uninfected, this nonrandomized analysis suggests that two doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine, and maybe even one dose, are as protective as three doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3186781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31867812011-10-05 Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine Kreimer, Aimée R. Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia Hildesheim, Allan Herrero, Rolando Porras, Carolina Schiffman, Mark González, Paula Solomon, Diane Jiménez, Silvia Schiller, John T. Lowy, Douglas R. Quint, Wim Sherman, Mark E. Schussler, John Wacholder, Sholom J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Three-dose regimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are expensive and difficult to complete, especially in settings where the need for cervical cancer prevention is greatest. METHODS: We evaluated the vaccine efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine Cervarix in our Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. Women were randomly assigned to receive three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine and were followed for incident HPV16 or HPV18 infection that persisted in visits that were 10 or more months apart (median follow-up 4.2 years). After excluding women who had no follow-up or who were HPV16 and HPV18 DNA positive at enrollment, 5967 women received three vaccine doses (2957 HPV vaccine vs 3010 control vaccine), 802 received two doses (422 HPV vs 380 control), and 384 received one dose (196 HPV vs 188 control). Reasons for receiving fewer doses and other pre- and post-randomization characteristics were balanced within each dosage group between women receiving the HPV and control vaccines. RESULTS: Incident HPV16 or HPV18 infections that persisted for 1 year were unrelated to dosage of the control vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was 80.9% for three doses of the HPV vaccine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 71.1% to 87.7%; 25 and 133 events in the HPV and control arms, respectively), 84.1% for two doses (95% CI = 50.2% to 96.3%; 3 and 17 events), and 100% for one dose (95% CI = 66.5% to 100%; 0 and 10 events). CONCLUSION: Four years after vaccination of women who appeared to be uninfected, this nonrandomized analysis suggests that two doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine, and maybe even one dose, are as protective as three doses. Oxford University Press 2011-10-05 2011-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3186781/ /pubmed/21908768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr319 Text en © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Kreimer, Aimée R.
Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia
Hildesheim, Allan
Herrero, Rolando
Porras, Carolina
Schiffman, Mark
González, Paula
Solomon, Diane
Jiménez, Silvia
Schiller, John T.
Lowy, Douglas R.
Quint, Wim
Sherman, Mark E.
Schussler, John
Wacholder, Sholom
Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title_full Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title_fullStr Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title_short Proof-of-Principle Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fewer Than Three Doses of a Bivalent HPV16/18 Vaccine
title_sort proof-of-principle evaluation of the efficacy of fewer than three doses of a bivalent hpv16/18 vaccine
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3186781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21908768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr319
work_keys_str_mv AT kreimeraimeer proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT rodriguezanacecilia proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT hildesheimallan proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT herrerorolando proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT porrascarolina proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT schiffmanmark proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT gonzalezpaula proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT solomondiane proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT jimenezsilvia proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT schillerjohnt proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT lowydouglasr proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT quintwim proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT shermanmarke proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT schusslerjohn proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT wacholdersholom proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine
AT proofofprincipleevaluationoftheefficacyoffewerthanthreedosesofabivalenthpv1618vaccine