Cargando…
Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception
Can lateral connectivity in the primary visual cortex account for the time dependence and intrinsic task difficulty of human contour detection? To answer this question, we created a synthetic image set that prevents sole reliance on either low-level visual features or high-level context for the dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21998562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002162 |
_version_ | 1782213377955725312 |
---|---|
author | Gintautas, Vadas Ham, Michael I. Kunsberg, Benjamin Barr, Shawn Brumby, Steven P. Rasmussen, Craig George, John S. Nemenman, Ilya Bettencourt, Luís M. A. Kenyon, Garret T. |
author_facet | Gintautas, Vadas Ham, Michael I. Kunsberg, Benjamin Barr, Shawn Brumby, Steven P. Rasmussen, Craig George, John S. Nemenman, Ilya Bettencourt, Luís M. A. Kenyon, Garret T. |
author_sort | Gintautas, Vadas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Can lateral connectivity in the primary visual cortex account for the time dependence and intrinsic task difficulty of human contour detection? To answer this question, we created a synthetic image set that prevents sole reliance on either low-level visual features or high-level context for the detection of target objects. Rendered images consist of smoothly varying, globally aligned contour fragments (amoebas) distributed among groups of randomly rotated fragments (clutter). The time course and accuracy of amoeba detection by humans was measured using a two-alternative forced choice protocol with self-reported confidence and variable image presentation time (20-200 ms), followed by an image mask optimized so as to interrupt visual processing. Measured psychometric functions were well fit by sigmoidal functions with exponential time constants of 30-91 ms, depending on amoeba complexity. Key aspects of the psychophysical experiments were accounted for by a computational network model, in which simulated responses across retinotopic arrays of orientation-selective elements were modulated by cortical association fields, represented as multiplicative kernels computed from the differences in pairwise edge statistics between target and distractor images. Comparing the experimental and the computational results suggests that each iteration of the lateral interactions takes at least [Image: see text] ms of cortical processing time. Our results provide evidence that cortical association fields between orientation selective elements in early visual areas can account for important temporal and task-dependent aspects of the psychometric curves characterizing human contour perception, with the remaining discrepancies postulated to arise from the influence of higher cortical areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3188484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31884842011-10-13 Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception Gintautas, Vadas Ham, Michael I. Kunsberg, Benjamin Barr, Shawn Brumby, Steven P. Rasmussen, Craig George, John S. Nemenman, Ilya Bettencourt, Luís M. A. Kenyon, Garret T. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Can lateral connectivity in the primary visual cortex account for the time dependence and intrinsic task difficulty of human contour detection? To answer this question, we created a synthetic image set that prevents sole reliance on either low-level visual features or high-level context for the detection of target objects. Rendered images consist of smoothly varying, globally aligned contour fragments (amoebas) distributed among groups of randomly rotated fragments (clutter). The time course and accuracy of amoeba detection by humans was measured using a two-alternative forced choice protocol with self-reported confidence and variable image presentation time (20-200 ms), followed by an image mask optimized so as to interrupt visual processing. Measured psychometric functions were well fit by sigmoidal functions with exponential time constants of 30-91 ms, depending on amoeba complexity. Key aspects of the psychophysical experiments were accounted for by a computational network model, in which simulated responses across retinotopic arrays of orientation-selective elements were modulated by cortical association fields, represented as multiplicative kernels computed from the differences in pairwise edge statistics between target and distractor images. Comparing the experimental and the computational results suggests that each iteration of the lateral interactions takes at least [Image: see text] ms of cortical processing time. Our results provide evidence that cortical association fields between orientation selective elements in early visual areas can account for important temporal and task-dependent aspects of the psychometric curves characterizing human contour perception, with the remaining discrepancies postulated to arise from the influence of higher cortical areas. Public Library of Science 2011-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3188484/ /pubmed/21998562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002162 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gintautas, Vadas Ham, Michael I. Kunsberg, Benjamin Barr, Shawn Brumby, Steven P. Rasmussen, Craig George, John S. Nemenman, Ilya Bettencourt, Luís M. A. Kenyon, Garret T. Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title | Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title_full | Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title_fullStr | Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title_short | Model Cortical Association Fields Account for the Time Course and Dependence on Target Complexity of Human Contour Perception |
title_sort | model cortical association fields account for the time course and dependence on target complexity of human contour perception |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21998562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gintautasvadas modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT hammichaeli modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT kunsbergbenjamin modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT barrshawn modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT brumbystevenp modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT rasmussencraig modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT georgejohns modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT nemenmanilya modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT bettencourtluisma modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception AT kenyongarrett modelcorticalassociationfieldsaccountforthetimecourseanddependenceontargetcomplexityofhumancontourperception |