Cargando…

An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation

BACKGROUND: Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by sexual orient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehmer , Ulrike, Ozonoff , Al, Miao , Xiaopeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21936932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-400
_version_ 1782213384558608384
author Boehmer , Ulrike
Ozonoff , Al
Miao , Xiaopeng
author_facet Boehmer , Ulrike
Ozonoff , Al
Miao , Xiaopeng
author_sort Boehmer , Ulrike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by sexual orientation, using individual-level data. METHODS: We use an ecological approach to examine differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by county-level sexual orientation data. From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program we obtain population-based surveillance data on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality from 1996 to 2004. We use Census 2000 data on same-sex partnered households, a proxy of sexual orientation, to derive county-level sexual orientation data. Using multiple regression models, we examined the county-level association of sexual minority density with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. RESULTS: After controlling for race and SES, we identify a significant positive association between greater density of sexual minority men and women and colorectal cancer incidence. With respect to colorectal cancer mortality, we identify a positive association with density of sexual minority men, but not women. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of surveillance data on sexual minority individuals, ecological analyses provide estimates of associations at the aggregate level, thereby providing crucial information for follow-up studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3188512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31885122011-10-07 An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation Boehmer , Ulrike Ozonoff , Al Miao , Xiaopeng BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Some have suggested gays and lesbians may carry a greater burden of colorectal cancer. To date, individual sexual orientation data are not available in cancer surveillance registries. This prevents an assessment of differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by sexual orientation, using individual-level data. METHODS: We use an ecological approach to examine differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality by county-level sexual orientation data. From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program we obtain population-based surveillance data on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality from 1996 to 2004. We use Census 2000 data on same-sex partnered households, a proxy of sexual orientation, to derive county-level sexual orientation data. Using multiple regression models, we examined the county-level association of sexual minority density with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. RESULTS: After controlling for race and SES, we identify a significant positive association between greater density of sexual minority men and women and colorectal cancer incidence. With respect to colorectal cancer mortality, we identify a positive association with density of sexual minority men, but not women. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of surveillance data on sexual minority individuals, ecological analyses provide estimates of associations at the aggregate level, thereby providing crucial information for follow-up studies. BioMed Central 2011-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3188512/ /pubmed/21936932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-400 Text en Copyright ©2011 Boehmer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boehmer , Ulrike
Ozonoff , Al
Miao , Xiaopeng
An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_full An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_fullStr An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_full_unstemmed An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_short An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation
title_sort ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: differences by sexual orientation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21936932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-400
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmerulrike anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT ozonoffal anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT miaoxiaopeng anecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT boehmerulrike ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT ozonoffal ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation
AT miaoxiaopeng ecologicalanalysisofcolorectalcancerincidenceandmortalitydifferencesbysexualorientation