Cargando…

DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches

The genetic analysis of faecal material represents a relatively non-invasive way to study animal diet and has been widely adopted in ecological research. Due to the heterogeneous nature of faecal material the primary obstacle, common to all genetic approaches, is a means to dissect the constituent D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Dáithí C., Bunce, Michael, Cannell, Belinda L., Oliver, Rebecca, Houston, Jayne, White, Nicole E., Barrero, Roberto A., Bellgard, Matthew I., Haile, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21998697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025776
_version_ 1782213397400518656
author Murray, Dáithí C.
Bunce, Michael
Cannell, Belinda L.
Oliver, Rebecca
Houston, Jayne
White, Nicole E.
Barrero, Roberto A.
Bellgard, Matthew I.
Haile, James
author_facet Murray, Dáithí C.
Bunce, Michael
Cannell, Belinda L.
Oliver, Rebecca
Houston, Jayne
White, Nicole E.
Barrero, Roberto A.
Bellgard, Matthew I.
Haile, James
author_sort Murray, Dáithí C.
collection PubMed
description The genetic analysis of faecal material represents a relatively non-invasive way to study animal diet and has been widely adopted in ecological research. Due to the heterogeneous nature of faecal material the primary obstacle, common to all genetic approaches, is a means to dissect the constituent DNA sequences. Traditionally, bacterial cloning of PCR amplified products was employed; less common has been the use of species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Currently, with the advent of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) technologies and indexed primers it has become possible to conduct genetic audits of faecal material to a much greater depth than previously possible. To date, no studies have systematically compared the estimates obtained by HTS with that of qPCR. What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of each technique and how quantitative are deep-sequencing approaches that employ universal primers? Using the locally threatened Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) as a model organism, it is shown here that both qPCR and HTS techniques are highly correlated and produce strikingly similar quantitative estimates of fish DNA in faecal material, with no statistical difference. By designing four species-specific fish qPCR assays and comparing the data to the same four fish in the HTS data it was possible to directly compare the strengths and weaknesses of both techniques. To obtain reproducible quantitative data one of the key, and often overlooked, steps common to both approaches is ensuring that efficient DNA isolation methods are employed and that extracts are free of inhibitors. Taken together, the methodology chosen for long-term faecal monitoring programs is largely dependent on the complexity of the prey species present and the level of accuracy that is desired. Importantly, these methods should not be thought of as mutually exclusive, as the use of both HTS and qPCR in tandem will generate datasets with the highest fidelity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3188572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31885722011-10-13 DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches Murray, Dáithí C. Bunce, Michael Cannell, Belinda L. Oliver, Rebecca Houston, Jayne White, Nicole E. Barrero, Roberto A. Bellgard, Matthew I. Haile, James PLoS One Research Article The genetic analysis of faecal material represents a relatively non-invasive way to study animal diet and has been widely adopted in ecological research. Due to the heterogeneous nature of faecal material the primary obstacle, common to all genetic approaches, is a means to dissect the constituent DNA sequences. Traditionally, bacterial cloning of PCR amplified products was employed; less common has been the use of species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Currently, with the advent of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) technologies and indexed primers it has become possible to conduct genetic audits of faecal material to a much greater depth than previously possible. To date, no studies have systematically compared the estimates obtained by HTS with that of qPCR. What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of each technique and how quantitative are deep-sequencing approaches that employ universal primers? Using the locally threatened Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) as a model organism, it is shown here that both qPCR and HTS techniques are highly correlated and produce strikingly similar quantitative estimates of fish DNA in faecal material, with no statistical difference. By designing four species-specific fish qPCR assays and comparing the data to the same four fish in the HTS data it was possible to directly compare the strengths and weaknesses of both techniques. To obtain reproducible quantitative data one of the key, and often overlooked, steps common to both approaches is ensuring that efficient DNA isolation methods are employed and that extracts are free of inhibitors. Taken together, the methodology chosen for long-term faecal monitoring programs is largely dependent on the complexity of the prey species present and the level of accuracy that is desired. Importantly, these methods should not be thought of as mutually exclusive, as the use of both HTS and qPCR in tandem will generate datasets with the highest fidelity. Public Library of Science 2011-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3188572/ /pubmed/21998697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025776 Text en Murray et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murray, Dáithí C.
Bunce, Michael
Cannell, Belinda L.
Oliver, Rebecca
Houston, Jayne
White, Nicole E.
Barrero, Roberto A.
Bellgard, Matthew I.
Haile, James
DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title_full DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title_fullStr DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title_full_unstemmed DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title_short DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches
title_sort dna-based faecal dietary analysis: a comparison of qpcr and high throughput sequencing approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21998697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025776
work_keys_str_mv AT murraydaithic dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT buncemichael dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT cannellbelindal dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT oliverrebecca dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT houstonjayne dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT whitenicolee dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT barrerorobertoa dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT bellgardmatthewi dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches
AT hailejames dnabasedfaecaldietaryanalysisacomparisonofqpcrandhighthroughputsequencingapproaches