Cargando…
The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160 |
_version_ | 1782213438428151808 |
---|---|
author | Killeen, Gerry F Okumu, Fredros O N'Guessan, Raphael Coosemans, Marc Adeogun, Adedapo Awolola, Sam Etang, Josiane Dabiré, Roch K Corbel, Vincent |
author_facet | Killeen, Gerry F Okumu, Fredros O N'Guessan, Raphael Coosemans, Marc Adeogun, Adedapo Awolola, Sam Etang, Josiane Dabiré, Roch K Corbel, Vincent |
author_sort | Killeen, Gerry F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can feed. However, at high coverage, community-level reductions of mosquito density and survival prevent more transmission exposure than the personal protection acquired by using a net or living in a sprayed house. METHODS: A process-explicit simulation of malaria transmission was applied to results of 4 recent Phase II experimental hut trials comparing a new mosaic long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) which combines deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide with another LLIN product by the same manufacturer relying on deltamethrin alone. RESULTS: Direct estimates of mean personal protection against insecticide-resistant vectors in Vietnam, Cameroon, Burkina Faso and Benin revealed no clear advantage for combination LLINs over deltamethrin-only LLINs (P = 0.973) unless both types of nets were extensively washed (Relative mean entomologic inoculation rate (EIR) ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for users of combination nets compared to users of deltamethrin only nets = 0.853 ± 0.056, P = 0.008). However, simulations of impact at high coverage (80% use) predicted consistently better impact for the combination net across all four sites (Relative mean EIR ± SEM in communities with combination nets, compared with those using deltamethrin only nets = 0.613 ± 0.076, P < 0.001), regardless of whether the nets were washed or not (P = 0.467). Nevertheless, the degree of advantage obtained with the combination varied substantially between sites and their associated resistant vector populations. CONCLUSION: Process-explicit simulations of community-level protection, parameterized using locally-relevant experimental hut studies, should be explicitly considered when choosing vector control products for large-scale epidemiological trials or public health programme procurement, particularly as growing insecticide resistance necessitates the use of multiple active ingredients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3189155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31891552011-10-08 The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products Killeen, Gerry F Okumu, Fredros O N'Guessan, Raphael Coosemans, Marc Adeogun, Adedapo Awolola, Sam Etang, Josiane Dabiré, Roch K Corbel, Vincent Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can feed. However, at high coverage, community-level reductions of mosquito density and survival prevent more transmission exposure than the personal protection acquired by using a net or living in a sprayed house. METHODS: A process-explicit simulation of malaria transmission was applied to results of 4 recent Phase II experimental hut trials comparing a new mosaic long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) which combines deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide with another LLIN product by the same manufacturer relying on deltamethrin alone. RESULTS: Direct estimates of mean personal protection against insecticide-resistant vectors in Vietnam, Cameroon, Burkina Faso and Benin revealed no clear advantage for combination LLINs over deltamethrin-only LLINs (P = 0.973) unless both types of nets were extensively washed (Relative mean entomologic inoculation rate (EIR) ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for users of combination nets compared to users of deltamethrin only nets = 0.853 ± 0.056, P = 0.008). However, simulations of impact at high coverage (80% use) predicted consistently better impact for the combination net across all four sites (Relative mean EIR ± SEM in communities with combination nets, compared with those using deltamethrin only nets = 0.613 ± 0.076, P < 0.001), regardless of whether the nets were washed or not (P = 0.467). Nevertheless, the degree of advantage obtained with the combination varied substantially between sites and their associated resistant vector populations. CONCLUSION: Process-explicit simulations of community-level protection, parameterized using locally-relevant experimental hut studies, should be explicitly considered when choosing vector control products for large-scale epidemiological trials or public health programme procurement, particularly as growing insecticide resistance necessitates the use of multiple active ingredients. BioMed Central 2011-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3189155/ /pubmed/21838903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160 Text en Copyright ©2011 Killeen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Killeen, Gerry F Okumu, Fredros O N'Guessan, Raphael Coosemans, Marc Adeogun, Adedapo Awolola, Sam Etang, Josiane Dabiré, Roch K Corbel, Vincent The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title | The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title_full | The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title_fullStr | The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title_short | The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
title_sort | importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT killeengerryf theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT okumufredroso theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT nguessanraphael theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT coosemansmarc theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT adeogunadedapo theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT awololasam theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT etangjosiane theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT dabirerochk theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT corbelvincent theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT killeengerryf importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT okumufredroso importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT nguessanraphael importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT coosemansmarc importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT adeogunadedapo importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT awololasam importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT etangjosiane importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT dabirerochk importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts AT corbelvincent importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts |