Cargando…

The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products

BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killeen, Gerry F, Okumu, Fredros O, N'Guessan, Raphael, Coosemans, Marc, Adeogun, Adedapo, Awolola, Sam, Etang, Josiane, Dabiré, Roch K, Corbel, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160
_version_ 1782213438428151808
author Killeen, Gerry F
Okumu, Fredros O
N'Guessan, Raphael
Coosemans, Marc
Adeogun, Adedapo
Awolola, Sam
Etang, Josiane
Dabiré, Roch K
Corbel, Vincent
author_facet Killeen, Gerry F
Okumu, Fredros O
N'Guessan, Raphael
Coosemans, Marc
Adeogun, Adedapo
Awolola, Sam
Etang, Josiane
Dabiré, Roch K
Corbel, Vincent
author_sort Killeen, Gerry F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can feed. However, at high coverage, community-level reductions of mosquito density and survival prevent more transmission exposure than the personal protection acquired by using a net or living in a sprayed house. METHODS: A process-explicit simulation of malaria transmission was applied to results of 4 recent Phase II experimental hut trials comparing a new mosaic long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) which combines deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide with another LLIN product by the same manufacturer relying on deltamethrin alone. RESULTS: Direct estimates of mean personal protection against insecticide-resistant vectors in Vietnam, Cameroon, Burkina Faso and Benin revealed no clear advantage for combination LLINs over deltamethrin-only LLINs (P = 0.973) unless both types of nets were extensively washed (Relative mean entomologic inoculation rate (EIR) ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for users of combination nets compared to users of deltamethrin only nets = 0.853 ± 0.056, P = 0.008). However, simulations of impact at high coverage (80% use) predicted consistently better impact for the combination net across all four sites (Relative mean EIR ± SEM in communities with combination nets, compared with those using deltamethrin only nets = 0.613 ± 0.076, P < 0.001), regardless of whether the nets were washed or not (P = 0.467). Nevertheless, the degree of advantage obtained with the combination varied substantially between sites and their associated resistant vector populations. CONCLUSION: Process-explicit simulations of community-level protection, parameterized using locally-relevant experimental hut studies, should be explicitly considered when choosing vector control products for large-scale epidemiological trials or public health programme procurement, particularly as growing insecticide resistance necessitates the use of multiple active ingredients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3189155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31891552011-10-08 The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products Killeen, Gerry F Okumu, Fredros O N'Guessan, Raphael Coosemans, Marc Adeogun, Adedapo Awolola, Sam Etang, Josiane Dabiré, Roch K Corbel, Vincent Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Insecticide treatment of nets, curtains or walls and ceilings of houses represent the primary means for malaria prevention worldwide. Direct personal protection of individuals and households arises from deterrent and insecticidal activities which divert or kill mosquitoes before they can feed. However, at high coverage, community-level reductions of mosquito density and survival prevent more transmission exposure than the personal protection acquired by using a net or living in a sprayed house. METHODS: A process-explicit simulation of malaria transmission was applied to results of 4 recent Phase II experimental hut trials comparing a new mosaic long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) which combines deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide with another LLIN product by the same manufacturer relying on deltamethrin alone. RESULTS: Direct estimates of mean personal protection against insecticide-resistant vectors in Vietnam, Cameroon, Burkina Faso and Benin revealed no clear advantage for combination LLINs over deltamethrin-only LLINs (P = 0.973) unless both types of nets were extensively washed (Relative mean entomologic inoculation rate (EIR) ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for users of combination nets compared to users of deltamethrin only nets = 0.853 ± 0.056, P = 0.008). However, simulations of impact at high coverage (80% use) predicted consistently better impact for the combination net across all four sites (Relative mean EIR ± SEM in communities with combination nets, compared with those using deltamethrin only nets = 0.613 ± 0.076, P < 0.001), regardless of whether the nets were washed or not (P = 0.467). Nevertheless, the degree of advantage obtained with the combination varied substantially between sites and their associated resistant vector populations. CONCLUSION: Process-explicit simulations of community-level protection, parameterized using locally-relevant experimental hut studies, should be explicitly considered when choosing vector control products for large-scale epidemiological trials or public health programme procurement, particularly as growing insecticide resistance necessitates the use of multiple active ingredients. BioMed Central 2011-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3189155/ /pubmed/21838903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160 Text en Copyright ©2011 Killeen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Killeen, Gerry F
Okumu, Fredros O
N'Guessan, Raphael
Coosemans, Marc
Adeogun, Adedapo
Awolola, Sam
Etang, Josiane
Dabiré, Roch K
Corbel, Vincent
The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title_full The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title_fullStr The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title_full_unstemmed The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title_short The importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
title_sort importance of considering community-level effects when selecting insecticidal malaria vector products
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-160
work_keys_str_mv AT killeengerryf theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT okumufredroso theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT nguessanraphael theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT coosemansmarc theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT adeogunadedapo theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT awololasam theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT etangjosiane theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT dabirerochk theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT corbelvincent theimportanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT killeengerryf importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT okumufredroso importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT nguessanraphael importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT coosemansmarc importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT adeogunadedapo importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT awololasam importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT etangjosiane importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT dabirerochk importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts
AT corbelvincent importanceofconsideringcommunityleveleffectswhenselectinginsecticidalmalariavectorproducts