Cargando…
Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition
At the onset of dynamic movements excitation of the motor cortex (M1) is spatially restricted to areas representing the involved muscles whereas adjacent areas are inhibited. The current study elucidates whether the cortical motor command for dynamic contractions is also restricted to a certain popu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22003402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025657 |
_version_ | 1782213449646866432 |
---|---|
author | Taube, Wolfgang Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper Schubert, Martin Gollhofer, Albert Leukel, Christian |
author_facet | Taube, Wolfgang Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper Schubert, Martin Gollhofer, Albert Leukel, Christian |
author_sort | Taube, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | At the onset of dynamic movements excitation of the motor cortex (M1) is spatially restricted to areas representing the involved muscles whereas adjacent areas are inhibited. The current study elucidates whether the cortical motor command for dynamic contractions is also restricted to a certain population of cortical neurons responsible for the fast corticospinal projections. Therefore, corticospinal transmission was assessed with high temporal resolution during dynamic contractions after both, magnetic stimulation over M1 and the brainstem. The high temporal resolution could be obtained by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with different interstimulus intervals by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS-conditioning) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 (M1-conditioning). This technique provides a precise time course of facilitation and inhibition. CMS- and M1-conditioning produced an ‘early facilitation’ of the H-reflex, which occurred around 3 ms earlier with CMS-conditioning. The early facilitation is believed to be caused by activation of direct monosynaptic projections to the spinal motoneurons. CMS-conditioning resulted in a subsequent ‘late facilitation’, which is considered to reflect activity of slow-conducting and/or indirect corticospinal pathways. In contrast, M1-conditioning produced a ‘late dis-facilitation’ or even ‘late inhibition’. As the late dis-facilitation was only seen following M1- but not CMS-conditioning, it is argued that cortical activation during dynamic tasks is restricted to fast, direct corticospinal projections whereas corticomotoneurons responsible for slow and/or indirectly projecting corticospinal pathways are inhibited. The functional significance of restricting the descending cortical drive to fast corticospinal pathways may be to ensure a temporally focused motor command during the execution of dynamic movements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3189210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31892102011-10-14 Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition Taube, Wolfgang Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper Schubert, Martin Gollhofer, Albert Leukel, Christian PLoS One Research Article At the onset of dynamic movements excitation of the motor cortex (M1) is spatially restricted to areas representing the involved muscles whereas adjacent areas are inhibited. The current study elucidates whether the cortical motor command for dynamic contractions is also restricted to a certain population of cortical neurons responsible for the fast corticospinal projections. Therefore, corticospinal transmission was assessed with high temporal resolution during dynamic contractions after both, magnetic stimulation over M1 and the brainstem. The high temporal resolution could be obtained by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with different interstimulus intervals by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS-conditioning) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 (M1-conditioning). This technique provides a precise time course of facilitation and inhibition. CMS- and M1-conditioning produced an ‘early facilitation’ of the H-reflex, which occurred around 3 ms earlier with CMS-conditioning. The early facilitation is believed to be caused by activation of direct monosynaptic projections to the spinal motoneurons. CMS-conditioning resulted in a subsequent ‘late facilitation’, which is considered to reflect activity of slow-conducting and/or indirect corticospinal pathways. In contrast, M1-conditioning produced a ‘late dis-facilitation’ or even ‘late inhibition’. As the late dis-facilitation was only seen following M1- but not CMS-conditioning, it is argued that cortical activation during dynamic tasks is restricted to fast, direct corticospinal projections whereas corticomotoneurons responsible for slow and/or indirectly projecting corticospinal pathways are inhibited. The functional significance of restricting the descending cortical drive to fast corticospinal pathways may be to ensure a temporally focused motor command during the execution of dynamic movements. Public Library of Science 2011-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3189210/ /pubmed/22003402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025657 Text en Taube et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Taube, Wolfgang Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper Schubert, Martin Gollhofer, Albert Leukel, Christian Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title | Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title_full | Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title_fullStr | Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title_short | Evidence That the Cortical Motor Command for the Initiation of Dynamic Plantarflexion Consists of Excitation followed by Inhibition |
title_sort | evidence that the cortical motor command for the initiation of dynamic plantarflexion consists of excitation followed by inhibition |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22003402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taubewolfgang evidencethatthecorticalmotorcommandfortheinitiationofdynamicplantarflexionconsistsofexcitationfollowedbyinhibition AT lundbyejensenjesper evidencethatthecorticalmotorcommandfortheinitiationofdynamicplantarflexionconsistsofexcitationfollowedbyinhibition AT schubertmartin evidencethatthecorticalmotorcommandfortheinitiationofdynamicplantarflexionconsistsofexcitationfollowedbyinhibition AT gollhoferalbert evidencethatthecorticalmotorcommandfortheinitiationofdynamicplantarflexionconsistsofexcitationfollowedbyinhibition AT leukelchristian evidencethatthecorticalmotorcommandfortheinitiationofdynamicplantarflexionconsistsofexcitationfollowedbyinhibition |