Cargando…

Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of physician- and patient-specific feedback with benchmarking on the quality of care in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Study centres in six European countries were randomised to either a benchmarking or control group. Physicians in both gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nobels, Frank, Debacker, Noëmi, Brotons, Carlos, Elisaf, Moses, Hermans, Michel P, Michel, Georges, Muls, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-10-82
_version_ 1782213466045546496
author Nobels, Frank
Debacker, Noëmi
Brotons, Carlos
Elisaf, Moses
Hermans, Michel P
Michel, Georges
Muls, Erik
author_facet Nobels, Frank
Debacker, Noëmi
Brotons, Carlos
Elisaf, Moses
Hermans, Michel P
Michel, Georges
Muls, Erik
author_sort Nobels, Frank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of physician- and patient-specific feedback with benchmarking on the quality of care in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Study centres in six European countries were randomised to either a benchmarking or control group. Physicians in both groups received feedback on modifiable outcome indicators (glycated haemoglobin [HbA(1c)], glycaemia, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein [LDL]-cholesterol and triglycerides) for each patient at 0, 4, 8 and 12 months, based on the four times yearly control visits recommended by international guidelines. The benchmarking group also received comparative results on three critical quality indicators of vascular risk (HbA(1c), LDL-cholesterol and systolic blood pressure [SBP]), checked against the results of their colleagues from the same country, and versus pre-set targets. After 12 months of follow up, the percentage of patients achieving the pre-determined targets for the three critical quality indicators will be assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: Recruitment was completed in December 2008 with 3994 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: This paper discusses the study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled study, that will help assess whether benchmarking is a useful clinical tool for improving outcomes in T2DM in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00681850
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3189404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31894042011-10-09 Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus Nobels, Frank Debacker, Noëmi Brotons, Carlos Elisaf, Moses Hermans, Michel P Michel, Georges Muls, Erik Cardiovasc Diabetol Methodology BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of physician- and patient-specific feedback with benchmarking on the quality of care in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Study centres in six European countries were randomised to either a benchmarking or control group. Physicians in both groups received feedback on modifiable outcome indicators (glycated haemoglobin [HbA(1c)], glycaemia, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein [LDL]-cholesterol and triglycerides) for each patient at 0, 4, 8 and 12 months, based on the four times yearly control visits recommended by international guidelines. The benchmarking group also received comparative results on three critical quality indicators of vascular risk (HbA(1c), LDL-cholesterol and systolic blood pressure [SBP]), checked against the results of their colleagues from the same country, and versus pre-set targets. After 12 months of follow up, the percentage of patients achieving the pre-determined targets for the three critical quality indicators will be assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: Recruitment was completed in December 2008 with 3994 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: This paper discusses the study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled study, that will help assess whether benchmarking is a useful clinical tool for improving outcomes in T2DM in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00681850 BioMed Central 2011-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3189404/ /pubmed/21939502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-10-82 Text en Copyright ©2011 Nobels et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Nobels, Frank
Debacker, Noëmi
Brotons, Carlos
Elisaf, Moses
Hermans, Michel P
Michel, Georges
Muls, Erik
Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort study rationale and design of optimise, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-10-82
work_keys_str_mv AT nobelsfrank studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT debackernoemi studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT brotonscarlos studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT elisafmoses studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT hermansmichelp studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT michelgeorges studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus
AT mulserik studyrationaleanddesignofoptimisearandomisedcontrolledtrialontheeffectofbenchmarkingonqualityofcareintype2diabetesmellitus