Cargando…

In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemalmaz, Deniz, Pameijer, Cornelis H., Latta, Mark, Kuybulu, Ferah, Alcan, Toros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22007219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508
_version_ 1782213478937788416
author Gemalmaz, Deniz
Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Latta, Mark
Kuybulu, Ferah
Alcan, Toros
author_facet Gemalmaz, Deniz
Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Latta, Mark
Kuybulu, Ferah
Alcan, Toros
author_sort Gemalmaz, Deniz
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients, average age 26 years. The holes were filled with a zinc phosphate (Phosphate Kulzer), a glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), a resin-modified-glass ionomer (Fuji Plus), and a resin cement (Calibra). Impressions were made at baseline, and 6, 12, and 18 months from which epoxy replicas were made, which were scanned with an optical scanner. Total volume loss was calculated. The rank order of mean volume loss was as follows: Phosphate cement > Ketac Cem = Fuji Plus = Calibra. Cement type and time had statistically significant effects on volume loss of cements (P < 0.001). Under in vivo conditions, zinc phosphate cement disintegrated the most, whereas no significant difference was observed for glass ionomer and resin-based cements. As intraoral conditions are considerably less aggressive than experimental laboratory conditions, the erosion behavior of glass ionomer cement was found to be similar to the resin-based cements in contradiction to previous laboratory results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3189560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31895602011-10-17 In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents Gemalmaz, Deniz Pameijer, Cornelis H. Latta, Mark Kuybulu, Ferah Alcan, Toros Int J Dent Clinical Study The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients, average age 26 years. The holes were filled with a zinc phosphate (Phosphate Kulzer), a glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), a resin-modified-glass ionomer (Fuji Plus), and a resin cement (Calibra). Impressions were made at baseline, and 6, 12, and 18 months from which epoxy replicas were made, which were scanned with an optical scanner. Total volume loss was calculated. The rank order of mean volume loss was as follows: Phosphate cement > Ketac Cem = Fuji Plus = Calibra. Cement type and time had statistically significant effects on volume loss of cements (P < 0.001). Under in vivo conditions, zinc phosphate cement disintegrated the most, whereas no significant difference was observed for glass ionomer and resin-based cements. As intraoral conditions are considerably less aggressive than experimental laboratory conditions, the erosion behavior of glass ionomer cement was found to be similar to the resin-based cements in contradiction to previous laboratory results. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3189560/ /pubmed/22007219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508 Text en Copyright © 2012 Deniz Gemalmaz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Gemalmaz, Deniz
Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Latta, Mark
Kuybulu, Ferah
Alcan, Toros
In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_full In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_fullStr In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_short In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_sort in vivo disintegration of four different luting agents
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22007219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508
work_keys_str_mv AT gemalmazdeniz invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT pameijercornelish invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT lattamark invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT kuybuluferah invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT alcantoros invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents