Cargando…
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement techniq...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994890 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497 |
_version_ | 1782213495428743168 |
---|---|
author | Subach, Brian R. Copay, Anne G. Martin, Marcus M. Schuler, Thomas C. |
author_facet | Subach, Brian R. Copay, Anne G. Martin, Marcus M. Schuler, Thomas C. |
author_sort | Subach, Brian R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement technique. Methods. This study is a retrospective evaluation of radiographs of patients who underwent stand-alone single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with lordotic titanium cages and rhBMP-2. Fifty-three patients were evaluated: 39 patients had wide cage placement (6 mm interdevice distance) and 14 had narrow cage placement (2 mm interdevice distance). Anterior and posterior intervertebral disc space heights were measured post-operatively and at follow-up imaging. Results. The decrease in anterior intervertebral disc space height was 2.05 mm versus 3.92 mm (P < .005) and 1.08 mm versus 3.06 mm in posterior disc space height for the wide cage placement and the narrow cage placement respectively. The proportion of patients with subsidence greater than 2 mm was 41.0% in the wide cage patients and 85.7% for the narrow cage patients (P < .005). Conclusions. The wider cage placement significantly reduced the amount of subsidence while allowing for a greater exposed surface area for interbody fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3189689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31896892011-10-12 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance Subach, Brian R. Copay, Anne G. Martin, Marcus M. Schuler, Thomas C. Adv Orthop Clinical Study Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement technique. Methods. This study is a retrospective evaluation of radiographs of patients who underwent stand-alone single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with lordotic titanium cages and rhBMP-2. Fifty-three patients were evaluated: 39 patients had wide cage placement (6 mm interdevice distance) and 14 had narrow cage placement (2 mm interdevice distance). Anterior and posterior intervertebral disc space heights were measured post-operatively and at follow-up imaging. Results. The decrease in anterior intervertebral disc space height was 2.05 mm versus 3.92 mm (P < .005) and 1.08 mm versus 3.06 mm in posterior disc space height for the wide cage placement and the narrow cage placement respectively. The proportion of patients with subsidence greater than 2 mm was 41.0% in the wide cage patients and 85.7% for the narrow cage patients (P < .005). Conclusions. The wider cage placement significantly reduced the amount of subsidence while allowing for a greater exposed surface area for interbody fusion. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011 2011-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3189689/ /pubmed/21994890 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497 Text en Copyright © 2011 Brian R. Subach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Subach, Brian R. Copay, Anne G. Martin, Marcus M. Schuler, Thomas C. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title | Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title_full | Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title_fullStr | Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title_full_unstemmed | Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title_short | Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance |
title_sort | anterior lumbar interbody implants: importance of the interdevice distance |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994890 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subachbrianr anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance AT copayanneg anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance AT martinmarcusm anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance AT schulerthomasc anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance |