Cargando…

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance

Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement techniq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subach, Brian R., Copay, Anne G., Martin, Marcus M., Schuler, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994890
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497
_version_ 1782213495428743168
author Subach, Brian R.
Copay, Anne G.
Martin, Marcus M.
Schuler, Thomas C.
author_facet Subach, Brian R.
Copay, Anne G.
Martin, Marcus M.
Schuler, Thomas C.
author_sort Subach, Brian R.
collection PubMed
description Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement technique. Methods. This study is a retrospective evaluation of radiographs of patients who underwent stand-alone single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with lordotic titanium cages and rhBMP-2. Fifty-three patients were evaluated: 39 patients had wide cage placement (6 mm interdevice distance) and 14 had narrow cage placement (2 mm interdevice distance). Anterior and posterior intervertebral disc space heights were measured post-operatively and at follow-up imaging. Results. The decrease in anterior intervertebral disc space height was 2.05 mm versus 3.92 mm (P < .005) and 1.08 mm versus 3.06 mm in posterior disc space height for the wide cage placement and the narrow cage placement respectively. The proportion of patients with subsidence greater than 2 mm was 41.0% in the wide cage patients and 85.7% for the narrow cage patients (P < .005). Conclusions. The wider cage placement significantly reduced the amount of subsidence while allowing for a greater exposed surface area for interbody fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3189689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31896892011-10-12 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance Subach, Brian R. Copay, Anne G. Martin, Marcus M. Schuler, Thomas C. Adv Orthop Clinical Study Object. The implantation of interbody fusion cages allows for the restoration of disc height and the enlargement of the neuroforaminal space. The purpose of this study was to compare the extent of subsidence occurring after conventional cage placement compared to a novel wider cage placement technique. Methods. This study is a retrospective evaluation of radiographs of patients who underwent stand-alone single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with lordotic titanium cages and rhBMP-2. Fifty-three patients were evaluated: 39 patients had wide cage placement (6 mm interdevice distance) and 14 had narrow cage placement (2 mm interdevice distance). Anterior and posterior intervertebral disc space heights were measured post-operatively and at follow-up imaging. Results. The decrease in anterior intervertebral disc space height was 2.05 mm versus 3.92 mm (P < .005) and 1.08 mm versus 3.06 mm in posterior disc space height for the wide cage placement and the narrow cage placement respectively. The proportion of patients with subsidence greater than 2 mm was 41.0% in the wide cage patients and 85.7% for the narrow cage patients (P < .005). Conclusions. The wider cage placement significantly reduced the amount of subsidence while allowing for a greater exposed surface area for interbody fusion. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011 2011-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3189689/ /pubmed/21994890 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497 Text en Copyright © 2011 Brian R. Subach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Subach, Brian R.
Copay, Anne G.
Martin, Marcus M.
Schuler, Thomas C.
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title_full Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title_fullStr Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title_short Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance
title_sort anterior lumbar interbody implants: importance of the interdevice distance
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994890
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497
work_keys_str_mv AT subachbrianr anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance
AT copayanneg anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance
AT martinmarcusm anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance
AT schulerthomasc anteriorlumbarinterbodyimplantsimportanceoftheinterdevicedistance