Cargando…

Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Warfarin nomograms to guide dosing have been shown to improve control of the international normalized ratio (INR) in the general outpatient setting. However, the effectiveness of these nomograms in hemodialysis patients is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of anticoagulation using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Benjamin KA, MacRae, Jennifer M, Barnieh, Lianne, Zhang, Jianguo, MacKay, Elizabeth, Manning, Megan A, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-46
_version_ 1782213513089908736
author Thomson, Benjamin KA
MacRae, Jennifer M
Barnieh, Lianne
Zhang, Jianguo
MacKay, Elizabeth
Manning, Megan A
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
author_facet Thomson, Benjamin KA
MacRae, Jennifer M
Barnieh, Lianne
Zhang, Jianguo
MacKay, Elizabeth
Manning, Megan A
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
author_sort Thomson, Benjamin KA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Warfarin nomograms to guide dosing have been shown to improve control of the international normalized ratio (INR) in the general outpatient setting. However, the effectiveness of these nomograms in hemodialysis patients is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of anticoagulation using an electronic warfarin nomogram administered by nurses in outpatient hemodialysis patients, compared to physician directed therapy. METHODS: Hemodialysis patients at any of the six outpatient clinics in Calgary, Alberta, treated with warfarin anticoagulation were included. Two five-month time periods were compared: prior to and post implementation of the nomogram. The primary endpoint was adequacy of anticoagulation (proportion of INR measurements within range ± 0.5 units). RESULTS: Overall, 67 patients were included in the pre- and 55 in the post-period (with 40 patients in both periods). Using generalized linear mixed models, the adequacy of INR control was similar in both periods for all range INR levels: in detail, range INR 1.5 to 2.5 (pre 93.6% (95% CI: 88.6% - 96.5%); post 95.6% (95% CI: 89.4% - 98.3%); p = 0.95); INR 2.0 to 3.0 (pre 82.2% (95% CI: 77.9% - 85.8%); post 77.4% (95% CI: 72.0% - 82.0%); p = 0.20); and, INR 2.5 to 3.5 (pre 84.3% (95% CI: 59.4% - 95.1%); post 66.8% (95% CI: 39.9% - 86.0%); p = 0.29). The mean number of INR measurements per patient decreased significantly between the pre- (30.5, 95% CI: 27.0 - 34.0) and post- (22.3, 95% CI: 18.4 - 26.1) (p = 0.003) period. There were 3 bleeding events in each of the periods. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic warfarin anticoagulation nomogram administered by nurses achieved INR control similar to that of physician directed therapy among hemodialysis patients in an outpatient setting, with a significant reduction in frequency of testing. Future controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy of this nomogram.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3189863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31898632011-10-11 Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients Thomson, Benjamin KA MacRae, Jennifer M Barnieh, Lianne Zhang, Jianguo MacKay, Elizabeth Manning, Megan A Hemmelgarn, Brenda R BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Warfarin nomograms to guide dosing have been shown to improve control of the international normalized ratio (INR) in the general outpatient setting. However, the effectiveness of these nomograms in hemodialysis patients is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of anticoagulation using an electronic warfarin nomogram administered by nurses in outpatient hemodialysis patients, compared to physician directed therapy. METHODS: Hemodialysis patients at any of the six outpatient clinics in Calgary, Alberta, treated with warfarin anticoagulation were included. Two five-month time periods were compared: prior to and post implementation of the nomogram. The primary endpoint was adequacy of anticoagulation (proportion of INR measurements within range ± 0.5 units). RESULTS: Overall, 67 patients were included in the pre- and 55 in the post-period (with 40 patients in both periods). Using generalized linear mixed models, the adequacy of INR control was similar in both periods for all range INR levels: in detail, range INR 1.5 to 2.5 (pre 93.6% (95% CI: 88.6% - 96.5%); post 95.6% (95% CI: 89.4% - 98.3%); p = 0.95); INR 2.0 to 3.0 (pre 82.2% (95% CI: 77.9% - 85.8%); post 77.4% (95% CI: 72.0% - 82.0%); p = 0.20); and, INR 2.5 to 3.5 (pre 84.3% (95% CI: 59.4% - 95.1%); post 66.8% (95% CI: 39.9% - 86.0%); p = 0.29). The mean number of INR measurements per patient decreased significantly between the pre- (30.5, 95% CI: 27.0 - 34.0) and post- (22.3, 95% CI: 18.4 - 26.1) (p = 0.003) period. There were 3 bleeding events in each of the periods. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic warfarin anticoagulation nomogram administered by nurses achieved INR control similar to that of physician directed therapy among hemodialysis patients in an outpatient setting, with a significant reduction in frequency of testing. Future controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy of this nomogram. BioMed Central 2011-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3189863/ /pubmed/21943221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-46 Text en Copyright ©2011 Thomson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomson, Benjamin KA
MacRae, Jennifer M
Barnieh, Lianne
Zhang, Jianguo
MacKay, Elizabeth
Manning, Megan A
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title_full Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title_short Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
title_sort evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-46
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonbenjaminka evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT macraejenniferm evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT barniehlianne evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT zhangjianguo evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT mackayelizabeth evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT manningmegana evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients
AT hemmelgarnbrendar evaluationofanelectronicwarfarinnomogramforanticoagulationofhemodialysispatients