Cargando…
Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays fo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354 |
_version_ | 1782213620528054272 |
---|---|
author | Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Moraes, Milton Ozório |
author_facet | Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Moraes, Milton Ozório |
author_sort | Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for leprosy diagnosis using a range of clinical samples that could bias molecular results such as difficult-to-diagnose cases. In this study, qPCR assays amplifying different M. leprae gene targets, sodA, 16S rRNA, RLEP and Ag 85B were compared for leprosy differential diagnosis. qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and 5 healthy donors. To develop standardized protocols and to overcome the bias resulted from using chromosome count cutoffs arbitrarily defined for different assays, decision tree classifiers were used to estimate optimum cutoffs and to evaluate the assays. As a result, we found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for 3 samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5–10 years after the collection of the biopsy. In addition, 4 other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients either had leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3191141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31911412011-10-21 Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Moraes, Milton Ozório PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for leprosy diagnosis using a range of clinical samples that could bias molecular results such as difficult-to-diagnose cases. In this study, qPCR assays amplifying different M. leprae gene targets, sodA, 16S rRNA, RLEP and Ag 85B were compared for leprosy differential diagnosis. qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and 5 healthy donors. To develop standardized protocols and to overcome the bias resulted from using chromosome count cutoffs arbitrarily defined for different assays, decision tree classifiers were used to estimate optimum cutoffs and to evaluate the assays. As a result, we found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for 3 samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5–10 years after the collection of the biopsy. In addition, 4 other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients either had leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations. Public Library of Science 2011-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3191141/ /pubmed/22022631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354 Text en Martinez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Moraes, Milton Ozório Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title | Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title_full | Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title_short | Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens |
title_sort | evaluation of qpcr-based assays for leprosy diagnosis directly in clinical specimens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezalejandranobrega evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens AT ribeiroalvesmarcelo evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens AT sarnoeuzenirnunes evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens AT moraesmiltonozorio evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens |