Cargando…

Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens

The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega, Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo, Sarno, Euzenir Nunes, Moraes, Milton Ozório
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354
_version_ 1782213620528054272
author Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega
Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Moraes, Milton Ozório
author_facet Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega
Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Moraes, Milton Ozório
author_sort Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega
collection PubMed
description The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for leprosy diagnosis using a range of clinical samples that could bias molecular results such as difficult-to-diagnose cases. In this study, qPCR assays amplifying different M. leprae gene targets, sodA, 16S rRNA, RLEP and Ag 85B were compared for leprosy differential diagnosis. qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and 5 healthy donors. To develop standardized protocols and to overcome the bias resulted from using chromosome count cutoffs arbitrarily defined for different assays, decision tree classifiers were used to estimate optimum cutoffs and to evaluate the assays. As a result, we found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for 3 samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5–10 years after the collection of the biopsy. In addition, 4 other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients either had leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31911412011-10-21 Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Moraes, Milton Ozório PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for leprosy diagnosis using a range of clinical samples that could bias molecular results such as difficult-to-diagnose cases. In this study, qPCR assays amplifying different M. leprae gene targets, sodA, 16S rRNA, RLEP and Ag 85B were compared for leprosy differential diagnosis. qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and 5 healthy donors. To develop standardized protocols and to overcome the bias resulted from using chromosome count cutoffs arbitrarily defined for different assays, decision tree classifiers were used to estimate optimum cutoffs and to evaluate the assays. As a result, we found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for 3 samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5–10 years after the collection of the biopsy. In addition, 4 other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients either had leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations. Public Library of Science 2011-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3191141/ /pubmed/22022631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354 Text en Martinez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martinez, Alejandra Nóbrega
Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Moraes, Milton Ozório
Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title_full Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title_fullStr Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title_short Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens
title_sort evaluation of qpcr-based assays for leprosy diagnosis directly in clinical specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001354
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezalejandranobrega evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens
AT ribeiroalvesmarcelo evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens
AT sarnoeuzenirnunes evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens
AT moraesmiltonozorio evaluationofqpcrbasedassaysforleprosydiagnosisdirectlyinclinicalspecimens