Cargando…

Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gates, Nicola J, Sachdev, Perminder S, Fiatarone Singh, Maria A, Valenzuela, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21942932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-55
_version_ 1782213665294909440
author Gates, Nicola J
Sachdev, Perminder S
Fiatarone Singh, Maria A
Valenzuela, Michael
author_facet Gates, Nicola J
Sachdev, Perminder S
Fiatarone Singh, Maria A
Valenzuela, Michael
author_sort Gates, Nicola J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the efficacy of training in memory strategies or cognitive exercises to determine if cognitive training could benefit individuals at risk of developing dementia. METHODS: A systematic review of eligible trials was undertaken, followed by effect size analysis. Cognitive training was differentiated from other cognitive interventions not meeting generally accepted definitions, and included both cognitive exercises and memory strategies. RESULTS: Ten studies enrolling a total of 305 subjects met criteria for cognitive training in MCI. Only five of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate due to the heterogeneity of interventions. Moderate effects on memory outcomes were identified in seven trials. Cognitive exercises (relative effect sizes ranged from .10 to 1.21) may lead to greater benefits than memory strategies (.88 to -1.18) on memory. CONCLUSIONS: Previous conclusions of a lack of efficacy for cognitive training in MCI may have been influenced by not clearly defining the intervention. Our systematic review found that cognitive exercises can produce moderate-to-large beneficial effects on memory-related outcomes. However, the number of high quality RCTs remains low, and so further trials must be a priority. Several suggestions for the better design of cognitive training trials are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31914772011-10-13 Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review Gates, Nicola J Sachdev, Perminder S Fiatarone Singh, Maria A Valenzuela, Michael BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the efficacy of training in memory strategies or cognitive exercises to determine if cognitive training could benefit individuals at risk of developing dementia. METHODS: A systematic review of eligible trials was undertaken, followed by effect size analysis. Cognitive training was differentiated from other cognitive interventions not meeting generally accepted definitions, and included both cognitive exercises and memory strategies. RESULTS: Ten studies enrolling a total of 305 subjects met criteria for cognitive training in MCI. Only five of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate due to the heterogeneity of interventions. Moderate effects on memory outcomes were identified in seven trials. Cognitive exercises (relative effect sizes ranged from .10 to 1.21) may lead to greater benefits than memory strategies (.88 to -1.18) on memory. CONCLUSIONS: Previous conclusions of a lack of efficacy for cognitive training in MCI may have been influenced by not clearly defining the intervention. Our systematic review found that cognitive exercises can produce moderate-to-large beneficial effects on memory-related outcomes. However, the number of high quality RCTs remains low, and so further trials must be a priority. Several suggestions for the better design of cognitive training trials are provided. BioMed Central 2011-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3191477/ /pubmed/21942932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-55 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gates et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gates, Nicola J
Sachdev, Perminder S
Fiatarone Singh, Maria A
Valenzuela, Michael
Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_full Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_short Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_sort cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21942932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-55
work_keys_str_mv AT gatesnicolaj cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT sachdevperminders cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT fiataronesinghmariaa cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT valenzuelamichael cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview