Cargando…

Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study

AIM: To assess the barriers to the uptake of refraction services in the age group of 15–49 years in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using cluster random sampling to enumerate 3300 individuals from 55 clusters. A validated questionnaire was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marmamula, Srinivas, Keeffe, Jill E, Raman, Usha, Rao, Gullapalli N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000172
_version_ 1782213674579001344
author Marmamula, Srinivas
Keeffe, Jill E
Raman, Usha
Rao, Gullapalli N
author_facet Marmamula, Srinivas
Keeffe, Jill E
Raman, Usha
Rao, Gullapalli N
author_sort Marmamula, Srinivas
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the barriers to the uptake of refraction services in the age group of 15–49 years in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using cluster random sampling to enumerate 3300 individuals from 55 clusters. A validated questionnaire was used to elicit information on barriers to utilisation of services among individuals with uncorrected refractive error (presenting visual acuity <6/12 but improving to ≥6/12 on using a pinhole) and presbyopia (binocular near vision <N8 in individuals aged >35 years with binocular distance visual acuity of ≥6/12). RESULTS: 3095 (94%) were available for examination. Those with uncorrected refractive errors cited affordability as the main barrier to the uptake of eye-care services. Among people with uncorrected presbyopia, lack of ‘felt need’ was the leading barrier. CONCLUSION: The barriers that were ‘relatively easy to change’ were reported by those with uncorrected refractive errors in contrast to ‘difficult to change’ barriers reported by those with uncorrected presbyopia. Together, the data on prevalence and an understanding of the barriers for the uptake of services are critical to the planning of refractive error services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31915772011-10-13 Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study Marmamula, Srinivas Keeffe, Jill E Raman, Usha Rao, Gullapalli N BMJ Open Public Health AIM: To assess the barriers to the uptake of refraction services in the age group of 15–49 years in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using cluster random sampling to enumerate 3300 individuals from 55 clusters. A validated questionnaire was used to elicit information on barriers to utilisation of services among individuals with uncorrected refractive error (presenting visual acuity <6/12 but improving to ≥6/12 on using a pinhole) and presbyopia (binocular near vision <N8 in individuals aged >35 years with binocular distance visual acuity of ≥6/12). RESULTS: 3095 (94%) were available for examination. Those with uncorrected refractive errors cited affordability as the main barrier to the uptake of eye-care services. Among people with uncorrected presbyopia, lack of ‘felt need’ was the leading barrier. CONCLUSION: The barriers that were ‘relatively easy to change’ were reported by those with uncorrected refractive errors in contrast to ‘difficult to change’ barriers reported by those with uncorrected presbyopia. Together, the data on prevalence and an understanding of the barriers for the uptake of services are critical to the planning of refractive error services. BMJ Group 2011-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3191577/ /pubmed/22021782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000172 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Public Health
Marmamula, Srinivas
Keeffe, Jill E
Raman, Usha
Rao, Gullapalli N
Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title_full Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title_fullStr Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title_full_unstemmed Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title_short Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
title_sort population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in south india: rapid assessment of refractive errors (rare) study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000172
work_keys_str_mv AT marmamulasrinivas populationbasedcrosssectionalstudyofbarrierstoutilisationofrefractionservicesinsouthindiarapidassessmentofrefractiveerrorsrarestudy
AT keeffejille populationbasedcrosssectionalstudyofbarrierstoutilisationofrefractionservicesinsouthindiarapidassessmentofrefractiveerrorsrarestudy
AT ramanusha populationbasedcrosssectionalstudyofbarrierstoutilisationofrefractionservicesinsouthindiarapidassessmentofrefractiveerrorsrarestudy
AT raogullapallin populationbasedcrosssectionalstudyofbarrierstoutilisationofrefractionservicesinsouthindiarapidassessmentofrefractiveerrorsrarestudy