Cargando…

Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Apler, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106
_version_ 1782213676419252224
author Apler, Alex
author_facet Apler, Alex
author_sort Apler, Alex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of citalopram in adults with MDD were included. Studies with medically ill or treatment resistant subjects were excluded, as were studies of relapse prevention. Remission of MDD was defined as a primary outcome, and response or change from baseline scores were defined as secondary. DATA EXTRACTION: Remission, response and symptom improvement scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scales were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out on the response rates and symptom improvement scores. Included studies were examined for the presence of bias and small study effects. RESULTS: Eight studies (n=2025) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies provided data on remission, but only one of these showed a significant difference between citalopram and placebo (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31). Meta-analysis of response rates in five studies (n=1010) revealed significant superiority of citalopram (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Meta-analysis of change from baseline scores in five studies (n=1541) gave a standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) of −0.27 (95% CI −0.38 to to −0.16), showing a reduction in MDD symptoms to be significant for citalopram relative to placebo. There was no evidence of any significant small study effects. The overall quality of reporting was poor, with insufficient information on the methodology or outcomes. Seven studies received industry sponsorship. CONCLUSIONS: Data concerning remission rates for citalopram, relative to placebo, are inconclusive. Response rates and symptom reduction scores in citalopram-treated patients with MDD are significantly better relative to placebo treatment, according to a meta-analysis of published reports. Evaluation of unpublished data is necessary to assess more definitively the effectiveness of citalopram for MDD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31915852011-10-13 Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials Apler, Alex BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of citalopram in adults with MDD were included. Studies with medically ill or treatment resistant subjects were excluded, as were studies of relapse prevention. Remission of MDD was defined as a primary outcome, and response or change from baseline scores were defined as secondary. DATA EXTRACTION: Remission, response and symptom improvement scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scales were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out on the response rates and symptom improvement scores. Included studies were examined for the presence of bias and small study effects. RESULTS: Eight studies (n=2025) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies provided data on remission, but only one of these showed a significant difference between citalopram and placebo (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31). Meta-analysis of response rates in five studies (n=1010) revealed significant superiority of citalopram (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Meta-analysis of change from baseline scores in five studies (n=1541) gave a standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) of −0.27 (95% CI −0.38 to to −0.16), showing a reduction in MDD symptoms to be significant for citalopram relative to placebo. There was no evidence of any significant small study effects. The overall quality of reporting was poor, with insufficient information on the methodology or outcomes. Seven studies received industry sponsorship. CONCLUSIONS: Data concerning remission rates for citalopram, relative to placebo, are inconclusive. Response rates and symptom reduction scores in citalopram-treated patients with MDD are significantly better relative to placebo treatment, according to a meta-analysis of published reports. Evaluation of unpublished data is necessary to assess more definitively the effectiveness of citalopram for MDD. BMJ Group 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3191585/ /pubmed/22021869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Apler, Alex
Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title_full Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title_fullStr Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title_short Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
title_sort citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106
work_keys_str_mv AT apleralex citalopramformajordepressivedisorderinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublishedplacebocontrolledtrials