Cargando…
Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUD...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106 |
_version_ | 1782213676419252224 |
---|---|
author | Apler, Alex |
author_facet | Apler, Alex |
author_sort | Apler, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of citalopram in adults with MDD were included. Studies with medically ill or treatment resistant subjects were excluded, as were studies of relapse prevention. Remission of MDD was defined as a primary outcome, and response or change from baseline scores were defined as secondary. DATA EXTRACTION: Remission, response and symptom improvement scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scales were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out on the response rates and symptom improvement scores. Included studies were examined for the presence of bias and small study effects. RESULTS: Eight studies (n=2025) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies provided data on remission, but only one of these showed a significant difference between citalopram and placebo (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31). Meta-analysis of response rates in five studies (n=1010) revealed significant superiority of citalopram (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Meta-analysis of change from baseline scores in five studies (n=1541) gave a standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) of −0.27 (95% CI −0.38 to to −0.16), showing a reduction in MDD symptoms to be significant for citalopram relative to placebo. There was no evidence of any significant small study effects. The overall quality of reporting was poor, with insufficient information on the methodology or outcomes. Seven studies received industry sponsorship. CONCLUSIONS: Data concerning remission rates for citalopram, relative to placebo, are inconclusive. Response rates and symptom reduction scores in citalopram-treated patients with MDD are significantly better relative to placebo treatment, according to a meta-analysis of published reports. Evaluation of unpublished data is necessary to assess more definitively the effectiveness of citalopram for MDD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3191585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31915852011-10-13 Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials Apler, Alex BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of citalopram in adults with MDD were included. Studies with medically ill or treatment resistant subjects were excluded, as were studies of relapse prevention. Remission of MDD was defined as a primary outcome, and response or change from baseline scores were defined as secondary. DATA EXTRACTION: Remission, response and symptom improvement scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scales were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out on the response rates and symptom improvement scores. Included studies were examined for the presence of bias and small study effects. RESULTS: Eight studies (n=2025) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies provided data on remission, but only one of these showed a significant difference between citalopram and placebo (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31). Meta-analysis of response rates in five studies (n=1010) revealed significant superiority of citalopram (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Meta-analysis of change from baseline scores in five studies (n=1541) gave a standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) of −0.27 (95% CI −0.38 to to −0.16), showing a reduction in MDD symptoms to be significant for citalopram relative to placebo. There was no evidence of any significant small study effects. The overall quality of reporting was poor, with insufficient information on the methodology or outcomes. Seven studies received industry sponsorship. CONCLUSIONS: Data concerning remission rates for citalopram, relative to placebo, are inconclusive. Response rates and symptom reduction scores in citalopram-treated patients with MDD are significantly better relative to placebo treatment, according to a meta-analysis of published reports. Evaluation of unpublished data is necessary to assess more definitively the effectiveness of citalopram for MDD. BMJ Group 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3191585/ /pubmed/22021869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Apler, Alex Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title | Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title_full | Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title_short | Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
title_sort | citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apleralex citalopramformajordepressivedisorderinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublishedplacebocontrolledtrials |