Cargando…

Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Self-diagnosis of influenza is an important component of pandemic control and management as it may support self-management practices and reduce visits to healthcare facilities, thus helping contain viral spread. However, little is known about the accuracy of self-diagnosis of influenza,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jutel, Annemarie, Baker, Michael G, Stanley, James, Huang, Q Sue, Bandaranayake, Don
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000234
_version_ 1782213680049422336
author Jutel, Annemarie
Baker, Michael G
Stanley, James
Huang, Q Sue
Bandaranayake, Don
author_facet Jutel, Annemarie
Baker, Michael G
Stanley, James
Huang, Q Sue
Bandaranayake, Don
author_sort Jutel, Annemarie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-diagnosis of influenza is an important component of pandemic control and management as it may support self-management practices and reduce visits to healthcare facilities, thus helping contain viral spread. However, little is known about the accuracy of self-diagnosis of influenza, particularly during pandemics. METHODS: We used cross-sectional survey data to correlate self-diagnosis of influenza with serological evidence of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection (haemagglutination inhibition titres of ≥1:40) and to determine what symptoms were more likely to be present in accurate self-diagnosis. The sera and risk factor data were collected for the national A(H1N1) seroprevalence survey from November 2009 to March 2010, 3 months after the first pandemic wave in New Zealand (NZ). RESULTS: The samples consisted of 318 children, 413 adults and 423 healthcare workers. The likelihood of being seropositive was no different in those who believed they had influenza from those who believed they did not have influenza in all groups. Among adults, 23.3% (95% CI 11.9% to 34.7%) of those who reported having had influenza were seropositive for H1N1, but among those reporting no influenza, 21.3% (95% CI 13% to 29.7%) were also seropositive. Those meeting NZ surveillance or Ministry of Health influenza case definitions were more likely to believe they had the flu (surveillance data adult sample OR 27.1, 95% CI 13.6 to 53.6), but these symptom profiles were not associated with a higher likelihood of H1N1 seropositivity (surveillance data adult sample OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Self-diagnosis does not accurately predict influenza seropositivity. The symptoms promoted by many public health campaigns are linked with self-diagnosis of influenza but not with seropositivity. These findings raise challenges for public health initiatives that depend on accurate self-diagnosis by members of the public and appropriate self-management action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31916012011-10-13 Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey Jutel, Annemarie Baker, Michael G Stanley, James Huang, Q Sue Bandaranayake, Don BMJ Open Public Health BACKGROUND: Self-diagnosis of influenza is an important component of pandemic control and management as it may support self-management practices and reduce visits to healthcare facilities, thus helping contain viral spread. However, little is known about the accuracy of self-diagnosis of influenza, particularly during pandemics. METHODS: We used cross-sectional survey data to correlate self-diagnosis of influenza with serological evidence of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection (haemagglutination inhibition titres of ≥1:40) and to determine what symptoms were more likely to be present in accurate self-diagnosis. The sera and risk factor data were collected for the national A(H1N1) seroprevalence survey from November 2009 to March 2010, 3 months after the first pandemic wave in New Zealand (NZ). RESULTS: The samples consisted of 318 children, 413 adults and 423 healthcare workers. The likelihood of being seropositive was no different in those who believed they had influenza from those who believed they did not have influenza in all groups. Among adults, 23.3% (95% CI 11.9% to 34.7%) of those who reported having had influenza were seropositive for H1N1, but among those reporting no influenza, 21.3% (95% CI 13% to 29.7%) were also seropositive. Those meeting NZ surveillance or Ministry of Health influenza case definitions were more likely to believe they had the flu (surveillance data adult sample OR 27.1, 95% CI 13.6 to 53.6), but these symptom profiles were not associated with a higher likelihood of H1N1 seropositivity (surveillance data adult sample OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Self-diagnosis does not accurately predict influenza seropositivity. The symptoms promoted by many public health campaigns are linked with self-diagnosis of influenza but not with seropositivity. These findings raise challenges for public health initiatives that depend on accurate self-diagnosis by members of the public and appropriate self-management action. BMJ Group 2011-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3191601/ /pubmed/22021887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000234 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Public Health
Jutel, Annemarie
Baker, Michael G
Stanley, James
Huang, Q Sue
Bandaranayake, Don
Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort self-diagnosis of influenza during a pandemic: a cross-sectional survey
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22021887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000234
work_keys_str_mv AT jutelannemarie selfdiagnosisofinfluenzaduringapandemicacrosssectionalsurvey
AT bakermichaelg selfdiagnosisofinfluenzaduringapandemicacrosssectionalsurvey
AT stanleyjames selfdiagnosisofinfluenzaduringapandemicacrosssectionalsurvey
AT huangqsue selfdiagnosisofinfluenzaduringapandemicacrosssectionalsurvey
AT bandaranayakedon selfdiagnosisofinfluenzaduringapandemicacrosssectionalsurvey