Cargando…
Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme
Objective To assess the performance and impact of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening with cytology triage compared with conventional cytology on cervical cancer and severe pre-cancerous lesions. Design Randomised trial. Setting Population based screening programme for cervical cancer i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20423964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1804 |
_version_ | 1782213682344755200 |
---|---|
author | Anttila, Ahti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Leinonen, Maarit Hakama, Matti Laurila, Pekka Tarkkanen, Jussi Malila, Nea Nieminen, Pekka |
author_facet | Anttila, Ahti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Leinonen, Maarit Hakama, Matti Laurila, Pekka Tarkkanen, Jussi Malila, Nea Nieminen, Pekka |
author_sort | Anttila, Ahti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To assess the performance and impact of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening with cytology triage compared with conventional cytology on cervical cancer and severe pre-cancerous lesions. Design Randomised trial. Setting Population based screening programme for cervical cancer in southern Finland in 2003-5. Participants 58 076 women, aged 30-60, invited to the routine population based screening programme for cervical cancer. Interventions Primary HPV DNA test (hybrid capture II) with cytology triage if the result was positive or conventional cytological screening (reference). Main outcome measures Rate of cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade III, and adenocarcinoma in situ (as a composite outcome referred to as CIN III+) during 2003-7 through record linkage between files from the screening registry and the national cancer registry. Results In the HPV and conventional arms there were 95 600 and 95 700 woman years of follow-up and 76 and 53 cases of CIN III+, respectively (of which six and eight were cervical cancers). The relative rate of CIN III+ in the HPV arm versus the conventional arm was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.05) among all women invited for screening and 1.77 (1.16 to 2.74) among those who attended. Among women with a normal or negative test result, the relative rate of subsequent CIN III+ was 0.28 (0.04 to 1.17). The rate of cervical cancer between arms was 0.75 (0.25 to 2.16) among women invited for screening and 1.98 (0.52 to 9.38) among those who attended. Conclusions When incorporated into a well established organised screening programme, primary HPV screening with cytology triage was more sensitive than conventional cytology in detecting CIN III+ lesions. The number of cases of cervical cancer was small, but considering the high probability of progression of CIN III the findings are of importance regarding cancer prevention. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23885553. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3191726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31917262011-10-13 Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme Anttila, Ahti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Leinonen, Maarit Hakama, Matti Laurila, Pekka Tarkkanen, Jussi Malila, Nea Nieminen, Pekka BMJ Research Objective To assess the performance and impact of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening with cytology triage compared with conventional cytology on cervical cancer and severe pre-cancerous lesions. Design Randomised trial. Setting Population based screening programme for cervical cancer in southern Finland in 2003-5. Participants 58 076 women, aged 30-60, invited to the routine population based screening programme for cervical cancer. Interventions Primary HPV DNA test (hybrid capture II) with cytology triage if the result was positive or conventional cytological screening (reference). Main outcome measures Rate of cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade III, and adenocarcinoma in situ (as a composite outcome referred to as CIN III+) during 2003-7 through record linkage between files from the screening registry and the national cancer registry. Results In the HPV and conventional arms there were 95 600 and 95 700 woman years of follow-up and 76 and 53 cases of CIN III+, respectively (of which six and eight were cervical cancers). The relative rate of CIN III+ in the HPV arm versus the conventional arm was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.05) among all women invited for screening and 1.77 (1.16 to 2.74) among those who attended. Among women with a normal or negative test result, the relative rate of subsequent CIN III+ was 0.28 (0.04 to 1.17). The rate of cervical cancer between arms was 0.75 (0.25 to 2.16) among women invited for screening and 1.98 (0.52 to 9.38) among those who attended. Conclusions When incorporated into a well established organised screening programme, primary HPV screening with cytology triage was more sensitive than conventional cytology in detecting CIN III+ lesions. The number of cases of cervical cancer was small, but considering the high probability of progression of CIN III the findings are of importance regarding cancer prevention. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23885553. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3191726/ /pubmed/20423964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1804 Text en © Anttila et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Anttila, Ahti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Leinonen, Maarit Hakama, Matti Laurila, Pekka Tarkkanen, Jussi Malila, Nea Nieminen, Pekka Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title | Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title_full | Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title_fullStr | Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title_short | Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
title_sort | rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary hpv dna screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20423964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anttilaahti rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT kotaniemitalonenlaura rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT leinonenmaarit rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT hakamamatti rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT laurilapekka rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT tarkkanenjussi rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT malilanea rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme AT nieminenpekka rateofcervicalcancersevereintraepithelialneoplasiaandadenocarcinomainsituinprimaryhpvdnascreeningwithcytologytriagerandomisedstudywithinorganisedscreeningprogramme |