Cargando…

Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting

BACKGROUND: In the absence of long-term, placebo-controlled studies of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), analysis of the results of open-label trials becomes crucial. This study aimed to explore the three-year effects of galantamine treatment, as well as subgroups of response an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallin, Åsa K, Wattmo, Carina, Minthon, Lennart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22003296
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S24196
_version_ 1782213699681910784
author Wallin, Åsa K
Wattmo, Carina
Minthon, Lennart
author_facet Wallin, Åsa K
Wattmo, Carina
Minthon, Lennart
author_sort Wallin, Åsa K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the absence of long-term, placebo-controlled studies of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), analysis of the results of open-label trials becomes crucial. This study aimed to explore the three-year effects of galantamine treatment, as well as subgroups of response and adherence to treatment. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD were included in the prospective, open-label, multicenter Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study, and received galantamine treatment. Efficacy measures included cognitive tests, ie, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), functional rating (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale [IADL]), and global rating. Assessments were carried out before treatment and every six months for a period of three years. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify response subgroups. RESULTS: After three years of treatment, the mean change from baseline was 2.6 points in MMSE and 5.6 points in ADAS-cog scores. Globally, half of the patients improved or remained unchanged for two years. Cluster analysis identified two response clusters. Cluster 1 included patients with low ability in ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Even though the patients in cluster 1 were older and less educated, they responded better at six months compared with patients in cluster 2. Cluster 2 included patients with better ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher frequency of the APOE ɛ4 allele, a slower pretreatment progression rate, and remained in the study longer than those in cluster 1. Three-year completers (n = 129, 46%) received higher doses of galantamine compared with dropouts. CONCLUSION: AD patients who received long-term galantamine treatment were cognitively and globally stabilized. Subgroup response analysis identified a better short-term response in older patients with lower cognitive and functional abilities at baseline, a faster pretreatment progression rate, and a lower incidence of the APOE ɛ4 allele. The galantamine dose was higher in the population of completers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31918692011-10-14 Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting Wallin, Åsa K Wattmo, Carina Minthon, Lennart Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: In the absence of long-term, placebo-controlled studies of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), analysis of the results of open-label trials becomes crucial. This study aimed to explore the three-year effects of galantamine treatment, as well as subgroups of response and adherence to treatment. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD were included in the prospective, open-label, multicenter Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study, and received galantamine treatment. Efficacy measures included cognitive tests, ie, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), functional rating (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale [IADL]), and global rating. Assessments were carried out before treatment and every six months for a period of three years. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify response subgroups. RESULTS: After three years of treatment, the mean change from baseline was 2.6 points in MMSE and 5.6 points in ADAS-cog scores. Globally, half of the patients improved or remained unchanged for two years. Cluster analysis identified two response clusters. Cluster 1 included patients with low ability in ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Even though the patients in cluster 1 were older and less educated, they responded better at six months compared with patients in cluster 2. Cluster 2 included patients with better ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher frequency of the APOE ɛ4 allele, a slower pretreatment progression rate, and remained in the study longer than those in cluster 1. Three-year completers (n = 129, 46%) received higher doses of galantamine compared with dropouts. CONCLUSION: AD patients who received long-term galantamine treatment were cognitively and globally stabilized. Subgroup response analysis identified a better short-term response in older patients with lower cognitive and functional abilities at baseline, a faster pretreatment progression rate, and a lower incidence of the APOE ɛ4 allele. The galantamine dose was higher in the population of completers. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3191869/ /pubmed/22003296 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S24196 Text en © 2011 Wallin et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wallin, Åsa K
Wattmo, Carina
Minthon, Lennart
Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title_full Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title_fullStr Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title_full_unstemmed Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title_short Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
title_sort galantamine treatment in alzheimer’s disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22003296
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S24196
work_keys_str_mv AT wallinasak galantaminetreatmentinalzheimersdiseaseresponseandlongtermoutcomeinaroutineclinicalsetting
AT wattmocarina galantaminetreatmentinalzheimersdiseaseresponseandlongtermoutcomeinaroutineclinicalsetting
AT minthonlennart galantaminetreatmentinalzheimersdiseaseresponseandlongtermoutcomeinaroutineclinicalsetting