Cargando…

A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the RELIEF study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two sequential intravenous (iv)/oral regimens: moxifloxacin iv/oral versus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) iv followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study had a prospective, ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gyssens, Inge C., Dryden, Matthew, Kujath, Peter, Nathwani, Dilip, Schaper, Nicolaas, Hampel, Barbara, Reimnitz, Peter, Alder, Jeff, Arvis, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr344
_version_ 1782213704427765760
author Gyssens, Inge C.
Dryden, Matthew
Kujath, Peter
Nathwani, Dilip
Schaper, Nicolaas
Hampel, Barbara
Reimnitz, Peter
Alder, Jeff
Arvis, Pierre
author_facet Gyssens, Inge C.
Dryden, Matthew
Kujath, Peter
Nathwani, Dilip
Schaper, Nicolaas
Hampel, Barbara
Reimnitz, Peter
Alder, Jeff
Arvis, Pierre
author_sort Gyssens, Inge C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the RELIEF study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two sequential intravenous (iv)/oral regimens: moxifloxacin iv/oral versus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) iv followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study had a prospective, randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, multicentre design. Patients ≥18 years were prospectively stratified according to complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) subtype/diagnosis (major abscess, diabetic foot infection, wound infection or infected ischaemic ulcer), surgical intervention and severity of illness. Diagnoses and disease severity were based on predetermined criteria, documented by repeated photographs, and confirmed by an independent data review committee. Patients were randomized to receive either 400 mg of moxifloxacin iv once daily followed by 400 mg of moxifloxacin orally once daily or 4.0/0.5 g of TZP iv thrice daily followed by 875/125 mg of AMC orally twice daily for 7–21 days. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response at test of cure (TOC) for the per-protocol (PP) population. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the data review committee based on repeated photographs and case descriptions. Clinical trials registry number: NCT 00402727. RESULTS: A total of 813 patients were randomized. Clinical success rates at TOC were similar for moxifloxacin and TZP–AMC in the PP [320/361 (88.6%) versus 275/307 (89.6%), respectively; P = 0.758] and intent-to-treat (ITT) [350/426 (82.2%) versus 305/377 (80.9%), respectively; P = 0.632] populations. Thus, moxifloxacin was non-inferior to TZP–AMC. Bacteriological success rates were high in both treatment arms [moxifloxacin: 432/497 (86.9%) versus TZP–AMC: 370/429 (86.2%), microbiologically valid (MBV) population]. Moxifloxacin was non-inferior to TZP–AMC at TOC in both the MBV and the ITT populations. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily iv/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy was clinically and bacteriologically non-inferior to iv TZP thrice daily followed by oral AMC twice daily in patients with cSSSIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3191944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31919442011-10-12 A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections Gyssens, Inge C. Dryden, Matthew Kujath, Peter Nathwani, Dilip Schaper, Nicolaas Hampel, Barbara Reimnitz, Peter Alder, Jeff Arvis, Pierre J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the RELIEF study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two sequential intravenous (iv)/oral regimens: moxifloxacin iv/oral versus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) iv followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study had a prospective, randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, multicentre design. Patients ≥18 years were prospectively stratified according to complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) subtype/diagnosis (major abscess, diabetic foot infection, wound infection or infected ischaemic ulcer), surgical intervention and severity of illness. Diagnoses and disease severity were based on predetermined criteria, documented by repeated photographs, and confirmed by an independent data review committee. Patients were randomized to receive either 400 mg of moxifloxacin iv once daily followed by 400 mg of moxifloxacin orally once daily or 4.0/0.5 g of TZP iv thrice daily followed by 875/125 mg of AMC orally twice daily for 7–21 days. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response at test of cure (TOC) for the per-protocol (PP) population. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the data review committee based on repeated photographs and case descriptions. Clinical trials registry number: NCT 00402727. RESULTS: A total of 813 patients were randomized. Clinical success rates at TOC were similar for moxifloxacin and TZP–AMC in the PP [320/361 (88.6%) versus 275/307 (89.6%), respectively; P = 0.758] and intent-to-treat (ITT) [350/426 (82.2%) versus 305/377 (80.9%), respectively; P = 0.632] populations. Thus, moxifloxacin was non-inferior to TZP–AMC. Bacteriological success rates were high in both treatment arms [moxifloxacin: 432/497 (86.9%) versus TZP–AMC: 370/429 (86.2%), microbiologically valid (MBV) population]. Moxifloxacin was non-inferior to TZP–AMC at TOC in both the MBV and the ITT populations. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily iv/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy was clinically and bacteriologically non-inferior to iv TZP thrice daily followed by oral AMC twice daily in patients with cSSSIs. Oxford University Press 2011-11 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3191944/ /pubmed/21896561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr344 Text en © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Research
Gyssens, Inge C.
Dryden, Matthew
Kujath, Peter
Nathwani, Dilip
Schaper, Nicolaas
Hampel, Barbara
Reimnitz, Peter
Alder, Jeff
Arvis, Pierre
A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_full A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_fullStr A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_short A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
title_sort randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr344
work_keys_str_mv AT gyssensingec arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT drydenmatthew arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT kujathpeter arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT nathwanidilip arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT schapernicolaas arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT hampelbarbara arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT reimnitzpeter arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT alderjeff arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT arvispierre arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT gyssensingec randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT drydenmatthew randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT kujathpeter randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT nathwanidilip randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT schapernicolaas randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT hampelbarbara randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT reimnitzpeter randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT alderjeff randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections
AT arvispierre randomizedtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyofsequentialintravenousoralmoxifloxacinmonotherapyversusintravenouspiperacillintazobactamfollowedbyoralamoxicillinclavulanateforcomplicatedskinandskinstructureinfections