Cargando…

Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods

BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by internatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inglis, Timothy J. J., Merritt, Adam J., Levy, Avram, Vietheer, Patricia, Bradbury, Richard, Scholler, Adam, Chidlow, Glenys, Smith, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526
_version_ 1782213706712612864
author Inglis, Timothy J. J.
Merritt, Adam J.
Levy, Avram
Vietheer, Patricia
Bradbury, Richard
Scholler, Adam
Chidlow, Glenys
Smith, David W.
author_facet Inglis, Timothy J. J.
Merritt, Adam J.
Levy, Avram
Vietheer, Patricia
Bradbury, Richard
Scholler, Adam
Chidlow, Glenys
Smith, David W.
author_sort Inglis, Timothy J. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by international travellers. At the height of the Australian epidemic a large number of troops converged on a training area in northern Australia for an international exercise, raising concerns about their potential exposure to the emerging influenza threat before, during and immediately after their arrival in the area. Influenza A/H1N1/09 became the dominant seasonal variant and returned to Australia during the Southern winter the following year. METHODS: A duplex nucleic acid amplification assay was developed within weeks of the first WHO influenza pandemic alert, demonstrated in northwestern Australia shortly afterwards and deployed as part of the pathology support for a field hospital during a military exercise during the initial epidemic surge in June 2009. RESULTS: The nucleic acid amplification assay was twice as sensitive as a point of care influenza immunoassay, as specific but a little less sensitive than the reference laboratory nucleic acid amplification assay. Repetition of the field assay with blinded clinical samples obtained during the 2010 winter influenza season demonstrated a 91.7% congruence with the reference laboratory method. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid in-house development of a deployable epidemic influenza assay allowed a flexible laboratory response, effective targeting of limited disease control resources in an austere military environment, and provided the public health laboratory service with a set of verification tools for resource-limited settings. The assay method was suitable for rapid deployment in time for the 2010 Northern winter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31920422011-10-21 Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods Inglis, Timothy J. J. Merritt, Adam J. Levy, Avram Vietheer, Patricia Bradbury, Richard Scholler, Adam Chidlow, Glenys Smith, David W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by international travellers. At the height of the Australian epidemic a large number of troops converged on a training area in northern Australia for an international exercise, raising concerns about their potential exposure to the emerging influenza threat before, during and immediately after their arrival in the area. Influenza A/H1N1/09 became the dominant seasonal variant and returned to Australia during the Southern winter the following year. METHODS: A duplex nucleic acid amplification assay was developed within weeks of the first WHO influenza pandemic alert, demonstrated in northwestern Australia shortly afterwards and deployed as part of the pathology support for a field hospital during a military exercise during the initial epidemic surge in June 2009. RESULTS: The nucleic acid amplification assay was twice as sensitive as a point of care influenza immunoassay, as specific but a little less sensitive than the reference laboratory nucleic acid amplification assay. Repetition of the field assay with blinded clinical samples obtained during the 2010 winter influenza season demonstrated a 91.7% congruence with the reference laboratory method. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid in-house development of a deployable epidemic influenza assay allowed a flexible laboratory response, effective targeting of limited disease control resources in an austere military environment, and provided the public health laboratory service with a set of verification tools for resource-limited settings. The assay method was suitable for rapid deployment in time for the 2010 Northern winter. Public Library of Science 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3192042/ /pubmed/22022407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526 Text en Inglis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Inglis, Timothy J. J.
Merritt, Adam J.
Levy, Avram
Vietheer, Patricia
Bradbury, Richard
Scholler, Adam
Chidlow, Glenys
Smith, David W.
Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title_full Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title_fullStr Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title_full_unstemmed Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title_short Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
title_sort deployable laboratory response to influenza pandemic; pcr assay field trials and comparison with reference methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526
work_keys_str_mv AT inglistimothyjj deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT merrittadamj deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT levyavram deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT vietheerpatricia deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT bradburyrichard deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT scholleradam deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT chidlowglenys deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods
AT smithdavidw deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods