Cargando…
Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by internatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526 |
_version_ | 1782213706712612864 |
---|---|
author | Inglis, Timothy J. J. Merritt, Adam J. Levy, Avram Vietheer, Patricia Bradbury, Richard Scholler, Adam Chidlow, Glenys Smith, David W. |
author_facet | Inglis, Timothy J. J. Merritt, Adam J. Levy, Avram Vietheer, Patricia Bradbury, Richard Scholler, Adam Chidlow, Glenys Smith, David W. |
author_sort | Inglis, Timothy J. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by international travellers. At the height of the Australian epidemic a large number of troops converged on a training area in northern Australia for an international exercise, raising concerns about their potential exposure to the emerging influenza threat before, during and immediately after their arrival in the area. Influenza A/H1N1/09 became the dominant seasonal variant and returned to Australia during the Southern winter the following year. METHODS: A duplex nucleic acid amplification assay was developed within weeks of the first WHO influenza pandemic alert, demonstrated in northwestern Australia shortly afterwards and deployed as part of the pathology support for a field hospital during a military exercise during the initial epidemic surge in June 2009. RESULTS: The nucleic acid amplification assay was twice as sensitive as a point of care influenza immunoassay, as specific but a little less sensitive than the reference laboratory nucleic acid amplification assay. Repetition of the field assay with blinded clinical samples obtained during the 2010 winter influenza season demonstrated a 91.7% congruence with the reference laboratory method. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid in-house development of a deployable epidemic influenza assay allowed a flexible laboratory response, effective targeting of limited disease control resources in an austere military environment, and provided the public health laboratory service with a set of verification tools for resource-limited settings. The assay method was suitable for rapid deployment in time for the 2010 Northern winter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3192042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31920422011-10-21 Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods Inglis, Timothy J. J. Merritt, Adam J. Levy, Avram Vietheer, Patricia Bradbury, Richard Scholler, Adam Chidlow, Glenys Smith, David W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by international travellers. At the height of the Australian epidemic a large number of troops converged on a training area in northern Australia for an international exercise, raising concerns about their potential exposure to the emerging influenza threat before, during and immediately after their arrival in the area. Influenza A/H1N1/09 became the dominant seasonal variant and returned to Australia during the Southern winter the following year. METHODS: A duplex nucleic acid amplification assay was developed within weeks of the first WHO influenza pandemic alert, demonstrated in northwestern Australia shortly afterwards and deployed as part of the pathology support for a field hospital during a military exercise during the initial epidemic surge in June 2009. RESULTS: The nucleic acid amplification assay was twice as sensitive as a point of care influenza immunoassay, as specific but a little less sensitive than the reference laboratory nucleic acid amplification assay. Repetition of the field assay with blinded clinical samples obtained during the 2010 winter influenza season demonstrated a 91.7% congruence with the reference laboratory method. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid in-house development of a deployable epidemic influenza assay allowed a flexible laboratory response, effective targeting of limited disease control resources in an austere military environment, and provided the public health laboratory service with a set of verification tools for resource-limited settings. The assay method was suitable for rapid deployment in time for the 2010 Northern winter. Public Library of Science 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3192042/ /pubmed/22022407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526 Text en Inglis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Inglis, Timothy J. J. Merritt, Adam J. Levy, Avram Vietheer, Patricia Bradbury, Richard Scholler, Adam Chidlow, Glenys Smith, David W. Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title | Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title_full | Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title_fullStr | Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title_short | Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods |
title_sort | deployable laboratory response to influenza pandemic; pcr assay field trials and comparison with reference methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inglistimothyjj deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT merrittadamj deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT levyavram deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT vietheerpatricia deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT bradburyrichard deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT scholleradam deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT chidlowglenys deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods AT smithdavidw deployablelaboratoryresponsetoinfluenzapandemicpcrassayfieldtrialsandcomparisonwithreferencemethods |