Cargando…

Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit

AIMS: We aimed to study the diagnostic influence of adding a routine cardiovascular ultrasound screening of the cardiac anatomy and function, the pericardium, the pleura and the abdominal great vessels by the new pocket-size ultrasound device (pUS) with grey scale and colour Doppler imaging. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skjetne, Kyrre, Graven, Torbjørn, Haugen, Bjørn Olav, Salvesen, Øyvind, Kleinau, Jens Olaf, Dalen, Håvard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer111
_version_ 1782213760077791232
author Skjetne, Kyrre
Graven, Torbjørn
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Salvesen, Øyvind
Kleinau, Jens Olaf
Dalen, Håvard
author_facet Skjetne, Kyrre
Graven, Torbjørn
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Salvesen, Øyvind
Kleinau, Jens Olaf
Dalen, Håvard
author_sort Skjetne, Kyrre
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We aimed to study the diagnostic influence of adding a routine cardiovascular ultrasound screening of the cardiac anatomy and function, the pericardium, the pleura and the abdominal great vessels by the new pocket-size ultrasound device (pUS) with grey scale and colour Doppler imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 119 randomly selected patients admitted to a cardiac unit at a non-university hospital, routinely adding a cardiovascular ultrasonography of only 4.4 min with a pocket-size device corrected the primary diagnosis in 16% of patients. In addition, 29% had the primary diagnosis verified and in 10% an additional important diagnosis was made. Higher age predicted any diagnostic influence of pUS screening with an increase of 61% (P = 0.003) per 10 years of higher age. Overall, the pUS screening had a sensitivity and specificity with respect to detecting at least moderate pathology of 97 and 93%. Positive and negative predictive values were 93 and 87%, respectively. In the sub-group of subjects with a change in the primary diagnosis following pUS there was no false-negative or false-positive findings. CONCLUSION: Screening by pUS assessed vascular and cardiac anatomy and function accurately and enabled correction of the diagnosis in 16% of patients admitted to a cardiac unit. In 55% of the participants, the cardiovascular ultrasound screening had important diagnostic influence. We suggest that it would be appropriate to implement strategies and systems for routinely adding an ultrasound cardiovascular examination to patients in cardiac units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31925082011-10-17 Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit Skjetne, Kyrre Graven, Torbjørn Haugen, Bjørn Olav Salvesen, Øyvind Kleinau, Jens Olaf Dalen, Håvard Eur J Echocardiogr Clinical/Original Papers AIMS: We aimed to study the diagnostic influence of adding a routine cardiovascular ultrasound screening of the cardiac anatomy and function, the pericardium, the pleura and the abdominal great vessels by the new pocket-size ultrasound device (pUS) with grey scale and colour Doppler imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 119 randomly selected patients admitted to a cardiac unit at a non-university hospital, routinely adding a cardiovascular ultrasonography of only 4.4 min with a pocket-size device corrected the primary diagnosis in 16% of patients. In addition, 29% had the primary diagnosis verified and in 10% an additional important diagnosis was made. Higher age predicted any diagnostic influence of pUS screening with an increase of 61% (P = 0.003) per 10 years of higher age. Overall, the pUS screening had a sensitivity and specificity with respect to detecting at least moderate pathology of 97 and 93%. Positive and negative predictive values were 93 and 87%, respectively. In the sub-group of subjects with a change in the primary diagnosis following pUS there was no false-negative or false-positive findings. CONCLUSION: Screening by pUS assessed vascular and cardiac anatomy and function accurately and enabled correction of the diagnosis in 16% of patients admitted to a cardiac unit. In 55% of the participants, the cardiovascular ultrasound screening had important diagnostic influence. We suggest that it would be appropriate to implement strategies and systems for routinely adding an ultrasound cardiovascular examination to patients in cardiac units. Oxford University Press 2011-10 2011-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3192508/ /pubmed/21821611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer111 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical/Original Papers
Skjetne, Kyrre
Graven, Torbjørn
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Salvesen, Øyvind
Kleinau, Jens Olaf
Dalen, Håvard
Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title_full Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title_fullStr Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title_short Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
title_sort diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit
topic Clinical/Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer111
work_keys_str_mv AT skjetnekyrre diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit
AT graventorbjørn diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit
AT haugenbjørnolav diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit
AT salvesenøyvind diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit
AT kleinaujensolaf diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit
AT dalenhavard diagnosticinfluenceofcardiovascularscreeningbypocketsizeultrasoundinacardiacunit