Cargando…

Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia

BACKGROUND: With time, episodes of migraine headache afflict patients with increased frequency, longer duration and more intense pain. While episodic migraine may be defined as 1-14 attacks per month, there are no clear-cut phases defined, and those patients with low frequency may progress to high f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maleki, Nasim, Becerra, Lino, Nutile, Lauren, Pendse, Gautam, Brawn, Jennifer, Bigal, Marcelo, Burstein, Rami, Borsook, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21936901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-7-71
_version_ 1782213770323427328
author Maleki, Nasim
Becerra, Lino
Nutile, Lauren
Pendse, Gautam
Brawn, Jennifer
Bigal, Marcelo
Burstein, Rami
Borsook, David
author_facet Maleki, Nasim
Becerra, Lino
Nutile, Lauren
Pendse, Gautam
Brawn, Jennifer
Bigal, Marcelo
Burstein, Rami
Borsook, David
author_sort Maleki, Nasim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With time, episodes of migraine headache afflict patients with increased frequency, longer duration and more intense pain. While episodic migraine may be defined as 1-14 attacks per month, there are no clear-cut phases defined, and those patients with low frequency may progress to high frequency episodic migraine and the latter may progress into chronic daily headache (> 15 attacks per month). The pathophysiology of this progression is completely unknown. Attempting to unravel this phenomenon, we used high field (human) brain imaging to compare functional responses, functional connectivity and brain morphology in patients whose migraine episodes did not progress (LF) to a matched (gender, age, age of onset and type of medication) group of patients whose migraine episodes progressed (HF). RESULTS: In comparison to LF patients, responses to pain in HF patients were significantly lower in the caudate, putamen and pallidum. Paradoxically, associated with these lower responses in HF patients, gray matter volume of the right and left caudate nuclei were significantly larger than in the LF patients. Functional connectivity analysis revealed additional differences between the two groups in regard to response to pain. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by current understanding of basal ganglia role in pain processing, the findings suggest a significant role of the basal ganglia in the pathophysiology of the episodic migraine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31926782011-10-14 Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia Maleki, Nasim Becerra, Lino Nutile, Lauren Pendse, Gautam Brawn, Jennifer Bigal, Marcelo Burstein, Rami Borsook, David Mol Pain Research BACKGROUND: With time, episodes of migraine headache afflict patients with increased frequency, longer duration and more intense pain. While episodic migraine may be defined as 1-14 attacks per month, there are no clear-cut phases defined, and those patients with low frequency may progress to high frequency episodic migraine and the latter may progress into chronic daily headache (> 15 attacks per month). The pathophysiology of this progression is completely unknown. Attempting to unravel this phenomenon, we used high field (human) brain imaging to compare functional responses, functional connectivity and brain morphology in patients whose migraine episodes did not progress (LF) to a matched (gender, age, age of onset and type of medication) group of patients whose migraine episodes progressed (HF). RESULTS: In comparison to LF patients, responses to pain in HF patients were significantly lower in the caudate, putamen and pallidum. Paradoxically, associated with these lower responses in HF patients, gray matter volume of the right and left caudate nuclei were significantly larger than in the LF patients. Functional connectivity analysis revealed additional differences between the two groups in regard to response to pain. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by current understanding of basal ganglia role in pain processing, the findings suggest a significant role of the basal ganglia in the pathophysiology of the episodic migraine. BioMed Central 2011-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3192678/ /pubmed/21936901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-7-71 Text en Copyright ©2011 Maleki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Maleki, Nasim
Becerra, Lino
Nutile, Lauren
Pendse, Gautam
Brawn, Jennifer
Bigal, Marcelo
Burstein, Rami
Borsook, David
Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title_full Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title_fullStr Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title_full_unstemmed Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title_short Migraine attacks the Basal Ganglia
title_sort migraine attacks the basal ganglia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21936901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-7-71
work_keys_str_mv AT malekinasim migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT becerralino migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT nutilelauren migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT pendsegautam migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT brawnjennifer migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT bigalmarcelo migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT bursteinrami migraineattacksthebasalganglia
AT borsookdavid migraineattacksthebasalganglia