Cargando…

Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) has been used to correct a breech presentation. Evidence of effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews is encouraging although significant heterogeneity has been found among trials. We assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, Carole K, Smith, Caroline A, Dahlen, Hannah, Bisits, Andrew, Schmied, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-81
_version_ 1782213772132220928
author Do, Carole K
Smith, Caroline A
Dahlen, Hannah
Bisits, Andrew
Schmied, Virginia
author_facet Do, Carole K
Smith, Caroline A
Dahlen, Hannah
Bisits, Andrew
Schmied, Virginia
author_sort Do, Carole K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) has been used to correct a breech presentation. Evidence of effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews is encouraging although significant heterogeneity has been found among trials. We assessed the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of moxibustion plus usual care compared with usual care to promote cephalic version in women with a breech presentation, and examined the views of women and health care providers towards implementing a trial within an Australian context. METHODS: The study was undertaken at a public hospital in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Women at 34-36.5 weeks of gestation with a singleton breech presentation (confirmed by ultrasound), were randomised to moxibustion plus usual care or usual care alone. The intervention was administered over 10 days. Clinical outcomes included cephalic presentation at birth, the need for ECV, mode of birth; perinatal morbidity and mortality, and maternal complications. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment rate, acceptability, compliance and a sample size for a future study. Interviews were conducted with 19 midwives and obstetricians to examine the acceptability of moxibustion, and views on the trial. RESULTS: Twenty women were randomised to the trial. Fifty one percent of women approached accepted randomisation to the trial. A trend towards an increase in cephalic version at delivery (RR 5.0; 95% CI 0.7-35.5) was found for women receiving moxibustion compared with usual care. There was also a trend towards greater success with version following ECV. Two babies were admitted to the neonatal unit from the moxibustion group. Compliance with the moxibustion protocol was acceptable with no reported side effects. Clinicians expressed the need for research to establish the safety and efficacy of moxibustion, and support for the intervention was given to increase women's choices, and explore opportunities to normalise birth. The sample size for a future trial is estimated to be 381 women. CONCLUSION: Our findings should be interpreted with caution as the study was underpowered to detect statistical differences between groups. Acceptance by women and health professionals towards moxibustion suggest further research is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12609000985280
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31926862011-10-14 Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial Do, Carole K Smith, Caroline A Dahlen, Hannah Bisits, Andrew Schmied, Virginia BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) has been used to correct a breech presentation. Evidence of effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews is encouraging although significant heterogeneity has been found among trials. We assessed the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of moxibustion plus usual care compared with usual care to promote cephalic version in women with a breech presentation, and examined the views of women and health care providers towards implementing a trial within an Australian context. METHODS: The study was undertaken at a public hospital in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Women at 34-36.5 weeks of gestation with a singleton breech presentation (confirmed by ultrasound), were randomised to moxibustion plus usual care or usual care alone. The intervention was administered over 10 days. Clinical outcomes included cephalic presentation at birth, the need for ECV, mode of birth; perinatal morbidity and mortality, and maternal complications. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment rate, acceptability, compliance and a sample size for a future study. Interviews were conducted with 19 midwives and obstetricians to examine the acceptability of moxibustion, and views on the trial. RESULTS: Twenty women were randomised to the trial. Fifty one percent of women approached accepted randomisation to the trial. A trend towards an increase in cephalic version at delivery (RR 5.0; 95% CI 0.7-35.5) was found for women receiving moxibustion compared with usual care. There was also a trend towards greater success with version following ECV. Two babies were admitted to the neonatal unit from the moxibustion group. Compliance with the moxibustion protocol was acceptable with no reported side effects. Clinicians expressed the need for research to establish the safety and efficacy of moxibustion, and support for the intervention was given to increase women's choices, and explore opportunities to normalise birth. The sample size for a future trial is estimated to be 381 women. CONCLUSION: Our findings should be interpreted with caution as the study was underpowered to detect statistical differences between groups. Acceptance by women and health professionals towards moxibustion suggest further research is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12609000985280 BioMed Central 2011-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3192686/ /pubmed/21943180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-81 Text en Copyright ©2011 Do et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Do, Carole K
Smith, Caroline A
Dahlen, Hannah
Bisits, Andrew
Schmied, Virginia
Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_short Moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_sort moxibustion for cephalic version: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-81
work_keys_str_mv AT docarolek moxibustionforcephalicversionafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithcarolinea moxibustionforcephalicversionafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dahlenhannah moxibustionforcephalicversionafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bisitsandrew moxibustionforcephalicversionafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmiedvirginia moxibustionforcephalicversionafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial