Cargando…
Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease
The role of structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming more and more emphasized in the early diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to assess the improvement in classification accuracy that can be achieved by combining features from different structural MRI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025446 |
_version_ | 1782213789229252608 |
---|---|
author | Wolz, Robin Julkunen, Valtteri Koikkalainen, Juha Niskanen, Eini Zhang, Dong Ping Rueckert, Daniel Soininen, Hilkka Lötjönen, Jyrki |
author_facet | Wolz, Robin Julkunen, Valtteri Koikkalainen, Juha Niskanen, Eini Zhang, Dong Ping Rueckert, Daniel Soininen, Hilkka Lötjönen, Jyrki |
author_sort | Wolz, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming more and more emphasized in the early diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to assess the improvement in classification accuracy that can be achieved by combining features from different structural MRI analysis techniques. Automatically estimated MR features used are hippocampal volume, tensor-based morphometry, cortical thickness and a novel technique based on manifold learning. Baseline MRIs acquired from all 834 subjects (231 healthy controls (HC), 238 stable mild cognitive impairment (S-MCI), 167 MCI to AD progressors (P-MCI), 198 AD) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were used for evaluation. We compared the classification accuracy achieved with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machines (SVM). The best results achieved with individual features are 90% sensitivity and 84% specificity (HC/AD classification), 64%/66% (S-MCI/P-MCI) and 82%/76% (HC/P-MCI) with the LDA classifier. The combination of all features improved these results to 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity (HC/AD), 67%/69% (S-MCI/P-MCI) and 86%/82% (HC/P-MCI). Compared with previously published results in the ADNI database using individual MR-based features, the presented results show that a comprehensive analysis of MRI images combining multiple features improves classification accuracy and predictive power in detecting early AD. The most stable and reliable classification was achieved when combining all available features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3192759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31927592011-10-21 Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease Wolz, Robin Julkunen, Valtteri Koikkalainen, Juha Niskanen, Eini Zhang, Dong Ping Rueckert, Daniel Soininen, Hilkka Lötjönen, Jyrki PLoS One Research Article The role of structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming more and more emphasized in the early diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to assess the improvement in classification accuracy that can be achieved by combining features from different structural MRI analysis techniques. Automatically estimated MR features used are hippocampal volume, tensor-based morphometry, cortical thickness and a novel technique based on manifold learning. Baseline MRIs acquired from all 834 subjects (231 healthy controls (HC), 238 stable mild cognitive impairment (S-MCI), 167 MCI to AD progressors (P-MCI), 198 AD) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were used for evaluation. We compared the classification accuracy achieved with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machines (SVM). The best results achieved with individual features are 90% sensitivity and 84% specificity (HC/AD classification), 64%/66% (S-MCI/P-MCI) and 82%/76% (HC/P-MCI) with the LDA classifier. The combination of all features improved these results to 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity (HC/AD), 67%/69% (S-MCI/P-MCI) and 86%/82% (HC/P-MCI). Compared with previously published results in the ADNI database using individual MR-based features, the presented results show that a comprehensive analysis of MRI images combining multiple features improves classification accuracy and predictive power in detecting early AD. The most stable and reliable classification was achieved when combining all available features. Public Library of Science 2011-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3192759/ /pubmed/22022397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025446 Text en Wolz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wolz, Robin Julkunen, Valtteri Koikkalainen, Juha Niskanen, Eini Zhang, Dong Ping Rueckert, Daniel Soininen, Hilkka Lötjönen, Jyrki Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title | Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full | Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title_fullStr | Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title_short | Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease |
title_sort | multi-method analysis of mri images in early diagnostics of alzheimer's disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolzrobin multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT julkunenvaltteri multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT koikkalainenjuha multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT niskaneneini multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT zhangdongping multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT rueckertdaniel multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT soininenhilkka multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT lotjonenjyrki multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease AT multimethodanalysisofmriimagesinearlydiagnosticsofalzheimersdisease |