Cargando…

Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream factors KRAS and BRAF are mutated in several types of cancer, affecting the clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. Mutations in the EGFR kinase domain predict sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borràs, Emma, Jurado, Ismael, Hernan, Imma, Gamundi, María José, Dias, Miguel, Martí, Isabel, Mañé, Begoña, Arcusa, Àngels, Agúndez, José AG, Blanca, Miguel, Carballo, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-406
_version_ 1782213795596206080
author Borràs, Emma
Jurado, Ismael
Hernan, Imma
Gamundi, María José
Dias, Miguel
Martí, Isabel
Mañé, Begoña
Arcusa, Àngels
Agúndez, José AG
Blanca, Miguel
Carballo, Miguel
author_facet Borràs, Emma
Jurado, Ismael
Hernan, Imma
Gamundi, María José
Dias, Miguel
Martí, Isabel
Mañé, Begoña
Arcusa, Àngels
Agúndez, José AG
Blanca, Miguel
Carballo, Miguel
author_sort Borràs, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream factors KRAS and BRAF are mutated in several types of cancer, affecting the clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. Mutations in the EGFR kinase domain predict sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in lung adenocarcinoma, while activating point mutations in KRAS and BRAF confer resistance to the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab in colorectal cancer. The development of new generation methods for systematic mutation screening of these genes will allow more appropriate therapeutic choices. METHODS: We describe a high resolution melting (HRM) assay for mutation detection in EGFR exons 19-21, KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF V600 using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Somatic variation of KRAS exon 2 was also analysed by massively parallel pyrosequencing of amplicons with the GS Junior 454 platform. RESULTS: We tested 120 routine diagnostic specimens from patients with colorectal or lung cancer. Mutations in KRAS, BRAF and EGFR were observed in 41.9%, 13.0% and 11.1% of the overall samples, respectively, being mutually exclusive. For KRAS, six types of substitutions were detected (17 G12D, 9 G13D, 7 G12C, 2 G12A, 2 G12V, 2 G12S), while V600E accounted for all the BRAF activating mutations. Regarding EGFR, two cases showed exon 19 deletions (delE746-A750 and delE746-T751insA) and another two substitutions in exon 21 (one showed L858R with the resistance mutation T590M in exon 20, and the other had P848L mutation). Consistent with earlier reports, our results show that KRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies in colorectal cancer were 44.3% and 13.0%, respectively, while EGFR mutations were detected in 11.1% of the lung cancer specimens. Ultra-deep amplicon pyrosequencing successfully validated the HRM results and allowed detection and quantitation of KRAS somatic mutations. CONCLUSIONS: HRM is a rapid and sensitive method for moderate-throughput cost-effective screening of oncogene mutations in clinical samples. Rather than Sanger sequence validation, next-generation sequencing technology results in more accurate quantitative results in somatic variation and can be achieved at a higher throughput scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31927872011-10-14 Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing Borràs, Emma Jurado, Ismael Hernan, Imma Gamundi, María José Dias, Miguel Martí, Isabel Mañé, Begoña Arcusa, Àngels Agúndez, José AG Blanca, Miguel Carballo, Miguel BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream factors KRAS and BRAF are mutated in several types of cancer, affecting the clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. Mutations in the EGFR kinase domain predict sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in lung adenocarcinoma, while activating point mutations in KRAS and BRAF confer resistance to the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab in colorectal cancer. The development of new generation methods for systematic mutation screening of these genes will allow more appropriate therapeutic choices. METHODS: We describe a high resolution melting (HRM) assay for mutation detection in EGFR exons 19-21, KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF V600 using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Somatic variation of KRAS exon 2 was also analysed by massively parallel pyrosequencing of amplicons with the GS Junior 454 platform. RESULTS: We tested 120 routine diagnostic specimens from patients with colorectal or lung cancer. Mutations in KRAS, BRAF and EGFR were observed in 41.9%, 13.0% and 11.1% of the overall samples, respectively, being mutually exclusive. For KRAS, six types of substitutions were detected (17 G12D, 9 G13D, 7 G12C, 2 G12A, 2 G12V, 2 G12S), while V600E accounted for all the BRAF activating mutations. Regarding EGFR, two cases showed exon 19 deletions (delE746-A750 and delE746-T751insA) and another two substitutions in exon 21 (one showed L858R with the resistance mutation T590M in exon 20, and the other had P848L mutation). Consistent with earlier reports, our results show that KRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies in colorectal cancer were 44.3% and 13.0%, respectively, while EGFR mutations were detected in 11.1% of the lung cancer specimens. Ultra-deep amplicon pyrosequencing successfully validated the HRM results and allowed detection and quantitation of KRAS somatic mutations. CONCLUSIONS: HRM is a rapid and sensitive method for moderate-throughput cost-effective screening of oncogene mutations in clinical samples. Rather than Sanger sequence validation, next-generation sequencing technology results in more accurate quantitative results in somatic variation and can be achieved at a higher throughput scale. BioMed Central 2011-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3192787/ /pubmed/21943394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-406 Text en Copyright ©2011 Borràs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borràs, Emma
Jurado, Ismael
Hernan, Imma
Gamundi, María José
Dias, Miguel
Martí, Isabel
Mañé, Begoña
Arcusa, Àngels
Agúndez, José AG
Blanca, Miguel
Carballo, Miguel
Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title_full Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title_fullStr Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title_full_unstemmed Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title_short Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
title_sort clinical pharmacogenomic testing of kras, braf and egfr mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-406
work_keys_str_mv AT borrasemma clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT juradoismael clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT hernanimma clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT gamundimariajose clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT diasmiguel clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT martiisabel clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT manebegona clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT arcusaangels clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT agundezjoseag clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT blancamiguel clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing
AT carballomiguel clinicalpharmacogenomictestingofkrasbrafandegfrmutationsbyhighresolutionmeltinganalysisandultradeeppyrosequencing