Cargando…

Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation

BACKGROUND: Transcriptional interference has been recently recognized as an unexpectedly complex and mostly negative regulation of genes. Despite a relatively few studies that emerged in recent years, it has been demonstrated that a readthrough transcription derived from one gene can influence the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaer, Kristel, Branovets, Jelena, Hallikma, Anni, Nigumann, Pilvi, Speek, Mart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026099
_version_ 1782213796737056768
author Kaer, Kristel
Branovets, Jelena
Hallikma, Anni
Nigumann, Pilvi
Speek, Mart
author_facet Kaer, Kristel
Branovets, Jelena
Hallikma, Anni
Nigumann, Pilvi
Speek, Mart
author_sort Kaer, Kristel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcriptional interference has been recently recognized as an unexpectedly complex and mostly negative regulation of genes. Despite a relatively few studies that emerged in recent years, it has been demonstrated that a readthrough transcription derived from one gene can influence the transcription of another overlapping or nested gene. However, the molecular effects resulting from this interaction are largely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using in silico chromosome walking, we searched for prematurely terminated transcripts bearing signatures of intron retention or exonization of intronic sequence at their 3′ ends upstream to human L1 retrotransposons, protein-coding and noncoding nested genes. We demonstrate that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s (or other repeated DNAs) and nested genes could be characterized by intron retention, forced exonization and cryptic polyadenylation. These molecular effects were revealed from the analysis of endogenous transcripts derived from different cell lines and tissues and confirmed by the expression of three minigenes in cell culture. While intron retention and exonization were comparably observed in introns upstream to L1s, forced exonization was preferentially detected in nested genes. Transcriptional interference induced by L1 or nested genes was dependent on the presence or absence of cryptic splice sites, affected the inclusion or exclusion of the upstream exon and the use of cryptic polyadenylation signals. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s and nested genes could influence the transcription of the large number of genes in normal as well as in tumor tissues. Therefore, this type of interference could have a major impact on the regulation of the host gene expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3192792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31927922011-10-21 Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation Kaer, Kristel Branovets, Jelena Hallikma, Anni Nigumann, Pilvi Speek, Mart PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Transcriptional interference has been recently recognized as an unexpectedly complex and mostly negative regulation of genes. Despite a relatively few studies that emerged in recent years, it has been demonstrated that a readthrough transcription derived from one gene can influence the transcription of another overlapping or nested gene. However, the molecular effects resulting from this interaction are largely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using in silico chromosome walking, we searched for prematurely terminated transcripts bearing signatures of intron retention or exonization of intronic sequence at their 3′ ends upstream to human L1 retrotransposons, protein-coding and noncoding nested genes. We demonstrate that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s (or other repeated DNAs) and nested genes could be characterized by intron retention, forced exonization and cryptic polyadenylation. These molecular effects were revealed from the analysis of endogenous transcripts derived from different cell lines and tissues and confirmed by the expression of three minigenes in cell culture. While intron retention and exonization were comparably observed in introns upstream to L1s, forced exonization was preferentially detected in nested genes. Transcriptional interference induced by L1 or nested genes was dependent on the presence or absence of cryptic splice sites, affected the inclusion or exclusion of the upstream exon and the use of cryptic polyadenylation signals. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that transcriptional interference induced by intronic L1s and nested genes could influence the transcription of the large number of genes in normal as well as in tumor tissues. Therefore, this type of interference could have a major impact on the regulation of the host gene expression. Public Library of Science 2011-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3192792/ /pubmed/22022525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026099 Text en Kaer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaer, Kristel
Branovets, Jelena
Hallikma, Anni
Nigumann, Pilvi
Speek, Mart
Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title_full Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title_fullStr Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title_full_unstemmed Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title_short Intronic L1 Retrotransposons and Nested Genes Cause Transcriptional Interference by Inducing Intron Retention, Exonization and Cryptic Polyadenylation
title_sort intronic l1 retrotransposons and nested genes cause transcriptional interference by inducing intron retention, exonization and cryptic polyadenylation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026099
work_keys_str_mv AT kaerkristel intronicl1retrotransposonsandnestedgenescausetranscriptionalinterferencebyinducingintronretentionexonizationandcrypticpolyadenylation
AT branovetsjelena intronicl1retrotransposonsandnestedgenescausetranscriptionalinterferencebyinducingintronretentionexonizationandcrypticpolyadenylation
AT hallikmaanni intronicl1retrotransposonsandnestedgenescausetranscriptionalinterferencebyinducingintronretentionexonizationandcrypticpolyadenylation
AT nigumannpilvi intronicl1retrotransposonsandnestedgenescausetranscriptionalinterferencebyinducingintronretentionexonizationandcrypticpolyadenylation
AT speekmart intronicl1retrotransposonsandnestedgenescausetranscriptionalinterferencebyinducingintronretentionexonizationandcrypticpolyadenylation