Cargando…

Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status

The advent of the mid-urethral sling (MUS) 15 years ago has drastically changed the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Both retropubic and transobturator MUS can be placed in the ambulatory setting with excellent results. The tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling has the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krlin, Ryan M., Murphy, Alana M., Ingber, Michael S., Vasavada, Sandip P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85424
_version_ 1782213873673175040
author Krlin, Ryan M.
Murphy, Alana M.
Ingber, Michael S.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
author_facet Krlin, Ryan M.
Murphy, Alana M.
Ingber, Michael S.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
author_sort Krlin, Ryan M.
collection PubMed
description The advent of the mid-urethral sling (MUS) 15 years ago has drastically changed the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Both retropubic and transobturator MUS can be placed in the ambulatory setting with excellent results. The tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling has the most robust and long-term data, but more recent literature suggests that the transobturator tape sling may offer comparable efficacy in appropriately selected patients. Single incision sling (SIS) is the newest addition to the MUS group and was developed in an attempt to minimize morbidity and create an anti-incontinence procedure that could be performed in the office. The efficacy of SIS remains unknown as the current literature regarding SIS lacks long-term results and comparative trials. The suprapubic arc sling appears to have equally effective outcomes in at least the short-term when compared with TVT. Although evolution of the SIS has led to a less invasive procedure with decreased post-op pain and reduced recovery time, durability of efficacy could be the endpoint we are sacrificing. Until longer-term data and more quality comparison trials are available, tailoring one's choice of MUS to the individual patient and her unique clinical parameters remains the best option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3193730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31937302011-10-21 Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status Krlin, Ryan M. Murphy, Alana M. Ingber, Michael S. Vasavada, Sandip P. Indian J Urol Review Article The advent of the mid-urethral sling (MUS) 15 years ago has drastically changed the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Both retropubic and transobturator MUS can be placed in the ambulatory setting with excellent results. The tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling has the most robust and long-term data, but more recent literature suggests that the transobturator tape sling may offer comparable efficacy in appropriately selected patients. Single incision sling (SIS) is the newest addition to the MUS group and was developed in an attempt to minimize morbidity and create an anti-incontinence procedure that could be performed in the office. The efficacy of SIS remains unknown as the current literature regarding SIS lacks long-term results and comparative trials. The suprapubic arc sling appears to have equally effective outcomes in at least the short-term when compared with TVT. Although evolution of the SIS has led to a less invasive procedure with decreased post-op pain and reduced recovery time, durability of efficacy could be the endpoint we are sacrificing. Until longer-term data and more quality comparison trials are available, tailoring one's choice of MUS to the individual patient and her unique clinical parameters remains the best option. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3193730/ /pubmed/22022053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85424 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Krlin, Ryan M.
Murphy, Alana M.
Ingber, Michael S.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title_full Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title_fullStr Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title_full_unstemmed Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title_short Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status
title_sort mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: current status
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85424
work_keys_str_mv AT krlinryanm midurethralslingsinfemaleincontinencecurrentstatus
AT murphyalanam midurethralslingsinfemaleincontinencecurrentstatus
AT ingbermichaels midurethralslingsinfemaleincontinencecurrentstatus
AT vasavadasandipp midurethralslingsinfemaleincontinencecurrentstatus