Cargando…

Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience

BACKGROUND: There are no Indian data of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Being an alternative, still experimental modality, reporting short-term safety outcome is paramount. AIMS: This study was aimed at to assess the safety and short-term outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Shashikant, Sharma, Rajan, Garg, Chandra Prakash, Muthu, V., Ganpule, Arvind, Sabnis, Ravindra B., Desai, Mahesh R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85431
_version_ 1782213874123014144
author Mishra, Shashikant
Sharma, Rajan
Garg, Chandra Prakash
Muthu, V.
Ganpule, Arvind
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
author_facet Mishra, Shashikant
Sharma, Rajan
Garg, Chandra Prakash
Muthu, V.
Ganpule, Arvind
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
author_sort Mishra, Shashikant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no Indian data of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Being an alternative, still experimental modality, reporting short-term safety outcome is paramount. AIMS: This study was aimed at to assess the safety and short-term outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated by HIFU. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective study of case records of 30 patients undergoing HIFU between January 2008 to September 2010 was designed and conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedural safety was analyzed at 3 months. Follow-up consisted of 3 monthly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and transrectal biopsy if indicated. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: A mean prostate volume of 26.9 ± 8.5 cm(3) was treated in a mean time of 115 ± 37.4 min. There was no intraoperative complication. The postoperative pain visual analogue score at day 0 was 2.1 ± 1.9 and at day 1 was 0.4 ± 0.8 on a scale of 1-10. Mean duration of perurethral catheter removal was 3.9 days. The complications after treatment were: LUTS in seven patients, stress incontinence in two, stricture in two, and symptomatic urinary tract infection in five. Average follow-up duration was 10.4 months (range, 6-20 months). Mean time to obtain PSA nadir was 6 ± 3 months with a median PSA nadir value of 0.3 ng/ml. Two patients had positive prostatic biopsy in the localized (high risk) group. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU was safe in carcinoma prostate patients. The short-term results were efficacious in localized disease. The low complication rates and favorable functional outcome support the planning of further larger studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3193732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31937322011-10-21 Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience Mishra, Shashikant Sharma, Rajan Garg, Chandra Prakash Muthu, V. Ganpule, Arvind Sabnis, Ravindra B. Desai, Mahesh R. Indian J Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: There are no Indian data of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Being an alternative, still experimental modality, reporting short-term safety outcome is paramount. AIMS: This study was aimed at to assess the safety and short-term outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated by HIFU. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective study of case records of 30 patients undergoing HIFU between January 2008 to September 2010 was designed and conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedural safety was analyzed at 3 months. Follow-up consisted of 3 monthly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and transrectal biopsy if indicated. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: A mean prostate volume of 26.9 ± 8.5 cm(3) was treated in a mean time of 115 ± 37.4 min. There was no intraoperative complication. The postoperative pain visual analogue score at day 0 was 2.1 ± 1.9 and at day 1 was 0.4 ± 0.8 on a scale of 1-10. Mean duration of perurethral catheter removal was 3.9 days. The complications after treatment were: LUTS in seven patients, stress incontinence in two, stricture in two, and symptomatic urinary tract infection in five. Average follow-up duration was 10.4 months (range, 6-20 months). Mean time to obtain PSA nadir was 6 ± 3 months with a median PSA nadir value of 0.3 ng/ml. Two patients had positive prostatic biopsy in the localized (high risk) group. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU was safe in carcinoma prostate patients. The short-term results were efficacious in localized disease. The low complication rates and favorable functional outcome support the planning of further larger studies. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3193732/ /pubmed/22022055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85431 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mishra, Shashikant
Sharma, Rajan
Garg, Chandra Prakash
Muthu, V.
Ganpule, Arvind
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title_full Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title_fullStr Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title_short Preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : A single center Indian experience
title_sort preliminary safety and efficacy results with robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound : a single center indian experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85431
work_keys_str_mv AT mishrashashikant preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT sharmarajan preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT gargchandraprakash preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT muthuv preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT ganpulearvind preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT sabnisravindrab preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience
AT desaimaheshr preliminarysafetyandefficacyresultswithrobotichighintensityfocusedultrasoundasinglecenterindianexperience