Cargando…

Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients

AIM: We report the outcome analysis of retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) performed in 428 patients in terms of pathological findings, complications, and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematically recorded case reports forms of consecutive 428 RRPs done over a 14-year period were analyzed u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N., Singh, Dayal Partap, Bansal, Shweta, Makkar, Manisha, Valsangkar, Rohan, Siddaiah, Avinash T., Choudhary, Pushkar Sham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85437
_version_ 1782213874349506560
author Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N.
Singh, Dayal Partap
Bansal, Shweta
Makkar, Manisha
Valsangkar, Rohan
Siddaiah, Avinash T.
Choudhary, Pushkar Sham
author_facet Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N.
Singh, Dayal Partap
Bansal, Shweta
Makkar, Manisha
Valsangkar, Rohan
Siddaiah, Avinash T.
Choudhary, Pushkar Sham
author_sort Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N.
collection PubMed
description AIM: We report the outcome analysis of retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) performed in 428 patients in terms of pathological findings, complications, and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematically recorded case reports forms of consecutive 428 RRPs done over a 14-year period were analyzed using the SPSS 14 software. Secondary analysis was done to evaluate era specific (pre and post 2002) changes in clinical features and survivals. RESULTS: Seven-year overall survival (OAS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and event-free survival (EFS) was 83.2%, 82.8%, and 69.8% respectively in our series. Era-specific survival showed higher CSS post 2002, and there was an increase in presentation with organ-confined disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed statistically significant impact on era specific outcome. With the improvement in techniques decrease in complications rate and increase in quality of life was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our series spanning over decade demonstrates that RRP is viable option to offer cure to organ-confined carcinoma prostate. Further, there is evidence of stage migration and improvements in outcome in post 2002 patients. Although our series is modest in number, the success rates and outcome data matches those reported in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3193733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31937332011-10-21 Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N. Singh, Dayal Partap Bansal, Shweta Makkar, Manisha Valsangkar, Rohan Siddaiah, Avinash T. Choudhary, Pushkar Sham Indian J Urol Original Article AIM: We report the outcome analysis of retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) performed in 428 patients in terms of pathological findings, complications, and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematically recorded case reports forms of consecutive 428 RRPs done over a 14-year period were analyzed using the SPSS 14 software. Secondary analysis was done to evaluate era specific (pre and post 2002) changes in clinical features and survivals. RESULTS: Seven-year overall survival (OAS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and event-free survival (EFS) was 83.2%, 82.8%, and 69.8% respectively in our series. Era-specific survival showed higher CSS post 2002, and there was an increase in presentation with organ-confined disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed statistically significant impact on era specific outcome. With the improvement in techniques decrease in complications rate and increase in quality of life was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our series spanning over decade demonstrates that RRP is viable option to offer cure to organ-confined carcinoma prostate. Further, there is evidence of stage migration and improvements in outcome in post 2002 patients. Although our series is modest in number, the success rates and outcome data matches those reported in the literature. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3193733/ /pubmed/22022056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85437 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N.
Singh, Dayal Partap
Bansal, Shweta
Makkar, Manisha
Valsangkar, Rohan
Siddaiah, Avinash T.
Choudhary, Pushkar Sham
Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title_full Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title_fullStr Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title_full_unstemmed Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title_short Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
title_sort retropubic radical prostatectomy: clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85437
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarnijagdeeshn retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT singhdayalpartap retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT bansalshweta retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT makkarmanisha retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT valsangkarrohan retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT siddaiahavinasht retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients
AT choudharypushkarsham retropubicradicalprostatectomyclinicopathologicalobservationsandoutcomeanalysisof428consecutivepatients