Cargando…

A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Purpose. The current pilot study investigates the effectiveness of a novel device in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). This device is able to automatically measure skin impedance in a selected body area and, immediately afterwards, to stimulate multiple points that are targeted accordin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorenberg, Miguel, Schiff, Elad, Schwartz, Kobi, Eizenberg, Elon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/152307
_version_ 1782214121785131008
author Gorenberg, Miguel
Schiff, Elad
Schwartz, Kobi
Eizenberg, Elon
author_facet Gorenberg, Miguel
Schiff, Elad
Schwartz, Kobi
Eizenberg, Elon
author_sort Gorenberg, Miguel
collection PubMed
description Purpose. The current pilot study investigates the effectiveness of a novel device in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). This device is able to automatically measure skin impedance in a selected body area and, immediately afterwards, to stimulate multiple points that are targeted according to differentiation in their electrical properties (peripheral nerve ends—milinated A δ fibers) with high-intensity electrical stimulation. Materials and Methods. Nineteen outpatients were included in the study, 15 females (79%) and 4 men (21%), mean age 52.1 ± 10.8 years, all diagnosed with nonspecific chronic LBP. The protocol consisted of 6 treatment sessions, 2–4 days apart. Each session included a <1 minute automatic impedance screening, followed by a 20-minute treatment of lowest impedance points according to proprietary algorithms. Outcome Measures. The primary outcome measure consisted of changes in pain intensity as measured on a 100 mm pain visual analogue scale (VAS) obtained at enrollment, before and 2 hours after each treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) obtained at baseline and each week during treatment. Results. The mean ± SD baseline VAS score for all participants was 61 ± 14. There were no significant changes in VAS scores between enrollment and before the first treatment (55 ± 16; P = .102). During treatment, VAS scores decreased significantly compared with baseline scores by 39 ± 17 mm (P < .001). Notably, VAS scores of all the patients, except for one, decreased by more than 20 mm after the fourth treatment, thus showing marked improvement in 95% of enrolled patients. ODI decreased throughout the entire treatment period, with significant changes from baseline already at the first week (P = .001). Lumbar flexion ROM showed a mean increase of 2.1 cm during treatment, but was not statistically significant. Conclusion. The results of the current pilot study show that treatment with this novel device produced a clinically significant reduction in back pain in 95% of patients after four treatment sessions. The decrease both in pain and perceived disability, combined with the improvement in ROM, support further investigation of the use of this therapy in the treatment of LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3195366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31953662011-11-22 A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Gorenberg, Miguel Schiff, Elad Schwartz, Kobi Eizenberg, Elon Pain Res Treat Research Article Purpose. The current pilot study investigates the effectiveness of a novel device in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). This device is able to automatically measure skin impedance in a selected body area and, immediately afterwards, to stimulate multiple points that are targeted according to differentiation in their electrical properties (peripheral nerve ends—milinated A δ fibers) with high-intensity electrical stimulation. Materials and Methods. Nineteen outpatients were included in the study, 15 females (79%) and 4 men (21%), mean age 52.1 ± 10.8 years, all diagnosed with nonspecific chronic LBP. The protocol consisted of 6 treatment sessions, 2–4 days apart. Each session included a <1 minute automatic impedance screening, followed by a 20-minute treatment of lowest impedance points according to proprietary algorithms. Outcome Measures. The primary outcome measure consisted of changes in pain intensity as measured on a 100 mm pain visual analogue scale (VAS) obtained at enrollment, before and 2 hours after each treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) obtained at baseline and each week during treatment. Results. The mean ± SD baseline VAS score for all participants was 61 ± 14. There were no significant changes in VAS scores between enrollment and before the first treatment (55 ± 16; P = .102). During treatment, VAS scores decreased significantly compared with baseline scores by 39 ± 17 mm (P < .001). Notably, VAS scores of all the patients, except for one, decreased by more than 20 mm after the fourth treatment, thus showing marked improvement in 95% of enrolled patients. ODI decreased throughout the entire treatment period, with significant changes from baseline already at the first week (P = .001). Lumbar flexion ROM showed a mean increase of 2.1 cm during treatment, but was not statistically significant. Conclusion. The results of the current pilot study show that treatment with this novel device produced a clinically significant reduction in back pain in 95% of patients after four treatment sessions. The decrease both in pain and perceived disability, combined with the improvement in ROM, support further investigation of the use of this therapy in the treatment of LBP. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3195366/ /pubmed/22110920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/152307 Text en Copyright © 2011 Miguel Gorenberg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorenberg, Miguel
Schiff, Elad
Schwartz, Kobi
Eizenberg, Elon
A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title_full A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title_fullStr A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title_short A Novel Image-Guided, Automatic, High-Intensity Neurostimulation Device for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain
title_sort novel image-guided, automatic, high-intensity neurostimulation device for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/152307
work_keys_str_mv AT gorenbergmiguel anovelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT schiffelad anovelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT schwartzkobi anovelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT eizenbergelon anovelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT gorenbergmiguel novelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT schiffelad novelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT schwartzkobi novelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain
AT eizenbergelon novelimageguidedautomatichighintensityneurostimulationdeviceforthetreatmentofnonspecificlowbackpain